Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Subjects at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) (PROTECT)
NCT ID: NCT00402740
Last Updated: 2012-06-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
322 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease (ACT I)
NCT00106938
Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting in Asymptomatic Patients
NCT00883402
PROACT Xa - A Trial to Determine if Participants With an On-X Aortic Valve Can be Maintained Safely on Apixaban
NCT04142658
Carotid Artery Implant for Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants
NCT03892824
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Renal Artery Stenting (RESIST)With/Without Distal Protection
NCT00234585
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xact Stent with either Emboshield Pro (Gen 5) or Emboshield (Gen 3)
All subjects will receive the Xact™ Rapid Exchange Carotid Stent System. The first 220 consecutively enrolled subjects will be treated with the investigational filter system, the Emboshield® Pro Rapid Exchange Embolic Protection System (Generation 5). The remaining subjects will be treated with the FDA approved Emboshield® BareWire™ Rapid Exchange Embolic Protection System (Generation 3).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a documented negative pregnancy test within 30 days prior to the index procedure.
Subjects taking warfarin may be included if their dosage is reduced before the index procedure to result in an INR of 1.5 or less. Warfarin may be restarted to therapeutic dose after the index procedure.
The subject must sign a written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures, using a form that is approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Medical Ethics Committee (EC).
The life expectancy of the subject is at least two years.
The subject has a lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA); the carotid bifurcation may be involved.
The target lesion is intended to be treated with a single stent.
Target ICA vessel diameter must be visually estimated to be:
* ≥2.5 mm and ≤7.0 for the Emboshield Pro (Gen 5)
* ≥ 2.8 mm and ≤6.2 for the Emboshield (Gen 3)
And
* ≥4.0 mm and ≤9.0 mm for the Xact Stent treatment area.
The subject has a carotid artery stenosis determined by ultrasound or angiography (visual estimate) to be:
* ≥50% for symptomatic subjects
Or
* ≥80% for asymptomatic subjects
Category I Anatomic Risk Factors
* Previous radiation treatment to the neck or radical neck dissection
* Target lesion is at or above the second vertebral body C2 (level of jaw)
* Inability to extend the head due to cervical arthritis or other cervical disorders
* Tracheostomy or tracheal stoma
* Laryngectomy
* Contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy
* Severe tandem lesions
Category II Co-morbid Risk Factors
* Previous CEA with significant restenosis (as defined for symptomatic or asymptomatic subjects)
* Total occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
* Congestive Heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or higher
* Dialysis dependent renal failure
* Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification III or higher or unstable angina
* Requires coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiac valve surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within 60 days
•≥80 years of age
* Myocardial infarction within previous 6 weeks
* Abnormal stress test. Treadmill, thallium or dobutamine echo are acceptable. The stress tests should be sufficiently abnormal to place the subject at increased risk for CEA. This includes subjects with two or more proximal diseased coronary arteries of \>70% stenosis that have not or cannot be revascularized or \<30 days since revascularization.
* Severe pulmonary disease, including at least one of the following: requires chronic O2 therapy; resting PO2 ≤60 mm Hg, Hematocrit ≥50%, FEV₁ or DLCO ≤50% of normal.
Exclusion Criteria
* The subject has dementia or a neurological illness that may confound the neurological evaluation.
* Total occlusion of the target vessel.
* There is an existing, previously placed stent in the target artery.
* The subject has a known life-threatening allergy to the contrast media that cannot be treated.
* Subject has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications including aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®) or Ticlopidine (Ticlid®), heparin or Bivalirudin (Angiomax™). Subjects must be able to tolerate a combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel or aspirin and Ticlopidine.
* The subject has a GI bleed that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
* The subject has known cardiac sources of emboli, including but not limited to current or past history of paroxysmal or sustained atrial fibrillation (treated or untreated), valve replacement, etc.
* Subject has Hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 8 gm/dL (unless on dialysis), platelet count \<50,000/mm3, or known heparin associated thrombocytopenia.
* The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy including thrombocytopenia or an inability to receive heparin or Bivalirudin (Angiomax™) in amounts sufficient to maintain an ACT of \>250, or will refuse blood transfusion.
* The subject has atherosclerotic disease involving adjoining vessels that precludes safe placement of the guiding catheter or sheath.
* The subject has other abnormal angiographic findings that indicate the subject is at risk for a stroke due to a problem other than that of the target lesion, such as: ipsilateral arterial stenosis greater in severity than the target lesion, cerebral aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation of the cerebral vasculature.
* There is evidence of a carotid artery dissection prior to the initiation of the index procedure.
* There is an angiographically visible thrombus.
* There is any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment, placement of the cerebral protective system or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe, e.g. morbid obesity, sustained systolic blood pressure \>180 mm Hg, tortuosity, occlusive disease, vessel anatomy, or aortic arch anatomy.
* Occlusion (TIMI 0 flow), or string sign of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
* There is evidence of bilateral carotid stenosis that would require intervention within 30 days of the index procedure.
* There is evidence of a stroke within the previous 30 days of the index procedure.
* There is a planned treatment of a non-target lesion within 30 days post-index procedure.
* There is a history of intracranial hemorrhage within the previous 3 months, including hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke.
* There is a history of an ipsilateral stroke with fluctuating neurologic symptoms within one year of the index procedure.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Seemant Chaturvedi, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Wayne State University Stroke Program
William A Gray, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Columbia University
Jon Matsumura, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington Hospital
Fremont, California, United States
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, United States
University of Connecticut Health Center
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Memorial Hospital Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Lakeland Regional Medical Center
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Munroe Regional Medical Center
Ocala, Florida, United States
Hawaii Permanente Medical Group-Kaiser Foundation Hospital
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Northwestern University Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
St. John's Hospital / Memorial Medical Center
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Parkview Hospital
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Terrebonne General Medical Center
Houma, Louisiana, United States
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
McLaren Regional Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, United States
Genesys Regional Medical Center
Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, United States
St. Michael's Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Millard Fillmore Hospital-Kaleida Health Systems
Buffalo, New York, United States
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, United States
WakeMed Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Pinnacle Health Hospital
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Joseph's Medical center
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Greenville Memorial Medical Center
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Mercy Medical Center West / Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Austin Heart P.A.
Austin, Texas, United States
Presbyterian Heart Institute
Dallas, Texas, United States
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Chesapeake General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital
Richmond, Virginia, United States
St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
640-0071
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.