Study to Improve Care for Veterans During Serious Illness

NCT ID: NCT00106041

Last Updated: 2015-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Improving end-of-life care is of critical importance to the VA as it faces an increasingly aging and dying veteran population. Previous work within and outside of the VA has demonstrated serious deficiencies in the quality of care delivered near the end of life. Moreover, veterans in the VA system suffer from a higher rate of chronic and life-limiting illnesses and decrements in health-related quality of life compared with the age-matched controls. In FY2000 approximately 104,000 enrolled veterans died in the U.S. including 27,200 that died as inpatients in VA acute or chronic care medical wards. The care model on which the proposed study is based is theoretically sound and has been piloted in a study that suggested its use can help the VA achieve substantial quality improvement at reduced costs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background / Rationale: Improving end-of-life care is of critical importance to the VA as it faces an increasingly aging and dying veteran population. In FY2000 approximately 104,000 enrolled veterans died in the U.S. including 27,200 that died as inpatients in VA acute or chronic care medical wards. Previous work within and outside of the VA has identified serious deficiencies in the quality of care delivered near the end of life. A pilot program of a collaborative care intervention in patients with advanced illness suggests that palliative care management may lead to improvements in processes and outcomes of care at reduced costs.

Objective(s): The purpose of this project is to test the effectiveness of a chronic illness model-based palliative care intervention that utilizes prognosis-based palliative care evaluation and longitudinal nurse care management on the processes and outcomes of end-of-life care at one VA medical center.

Methods: The study uses a randomized, controlled design. All patients admitted to the inpatient medical service during the enrollment period are screened for survival prognosis by their admitting resident physician. Patients estimated to have at least a 25% risk of dying over the following year and who meet other basic inclusion criteria are invited to participate. Consenting patients are randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention entails initial palliative evaluation followed by nurse care management designed to promote informed goal-setting, symptom management, psycho/socio/spiritual support, and family support. Data collection activities include patient and caregiver surveys, chart reviews, and reviews of administrative databases. Primary study outcomes include caregiver-rated quality of death and dying, hospital-based resource use, and costs; secondary outcomes include patient quality of life, satisfaction with care, continuity and coordination of care, and patient self-determination

Status: Enrollment and follow up of veterans/patients in the study is complete. Follow up with the caregivers of patients who died is ongoing and projected to end in February 2008. Subject enrollment began on 08/04/04 and target enrollment of 400 patients was reached in November 2006. Of the 1354 non-duplicated patients admitted to the hospital and prognostically eligible for the study, 795 (59%) were excluded; 400 (30%) were enrolled; 142(10%) refused; and 17 (1%) were missed or did not respond to recruitment efforts. To date, 257 of 400 enrolled veterans (64%) have died and 152 after-death interviews have been conducted with caregivers.

Impact: If shown to be effective, the palliative care program tested in this study will be the first of its type to demonstrate success in a controlled trial, and it will be ready for larger-scale implementation studies that will inform models of end-of-life care delivery both within and outside of the VA. Administrators at VAs nationwide, including chiefs of service, chiefs of staff, hospital directors, and VISN directors will be able to use the plans and protocols developed in this project to develop programs at their own institutions. Nurses, generalist physicians, and specialists can gain important insights about the special needs of seriously ill patients and the role of care systems in delivering high-quality end of life care. Finally, the project has immediate relevance to the healthcare system at large, as it struggles to find effective end-of-life care delivery models.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Palliative Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Palliative Care Nurse Case Management

Group Type OTHER

Veterans Integrated Palliative Care Nurse Case Manager

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Palliative Care nurse case management

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Veterans Integrated Palliative Care Nurse Case Manager

Palliative Care nurse case management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All patients admitted to the hospital's general medicine service and estimated to have at least a 25% risk of dying over the following year.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to pass cognitive screen
* Homelessness
* No telephone
* Admission from or discharge to a nursing home or hospice care
* Enrollment in another healthcare program or study that duplicates services of this study
* Receives most healthcare/primary healthcare services outside the VA GLA catchment area
* Does not speak English
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth E. Rosenfeld, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

West Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wagner GJ, Riopelle D, Steckart J, Lorenz KA, Rosenfeld KE. Provider communication and patient understanding of life-limiting illness and their relationship to patient communication of treatment preferences. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.012. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20171827 (View on PubMed)

Seow H, Snyder CF, Shugarman LR, Mularski RA, Kutner JS, Lorenz KA, Wu AW, Dy SM. Developing quality indicators for cancer end-of-life care: proceedings from a national symposium. Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3820-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24439.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19514090 (View on PubMed)

Goebel JR, Doering LV, Lorenz KA, Maliski SL, Nyamathi AM, Evangelista LS. Caring for special populations: total pain theory in advanced heart failure: applications to research and practice. Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul-Sep;44(3):175-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00140.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19691653 (View on PubMed)

Fromme EK, Hughes MT, Brokaw FC, Rosenfeld KE, Arnold RM. Update in palliative medicine 2008. Journal of palliative medicine. 2008 Jun 1; 11(5):769-75.

Reference Type RESULT

Casarett D, Pickard A, Amos Bailey F, Ritchie C, Furman C, Rosenfeld K, Shreve S, Shea JA. Important aspects of end-of-life care among veterans: implications for measurement and quality improvement. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Feb;35(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.008. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18053680 (View on PubMed)

Lorenz KA, Lynn J, Dy SM, Shugarman LR, Wilkinson A, Mularski RA, Morton SC, Hughes RG, Hilton LK, Maglione M, Rhodes SL, Rolon C, Sun VC, Shekelle PG. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):147-59. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00010.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18195339 (View on PubMed)

Lorenz KA, Rosenfeld K, Wenger N. Quality indicators for palliative and end-of-life care in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Oct;55 Suppl 2:S318-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01338.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17910553 (View on PubMed)

Chang VT, Sorger B, Rosenfeld KE, Lorenz KA, Bailey AF, Bui T, Weinberger L, Montagnini M. Pain and palliative medicine. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(2):279-94. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.06.0067.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17551879 (View on PubMed)

Krouse RS, Mohler MJ, Wendel CS, Grant M, Baldwin CM, Rawl SM, McCorkle R, Rosenfeld KE, Ko CY, Schmidt CM, Coons SJ. The VA Ostomy Health-Related Quality of Life Study: objectives, methods, and patient sample. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Apr;22(4):781-91. doi: 10.1185/030079906X96380.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16684439 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 02-294

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Skilled Nursing Facility Care at Home
NCT06416670 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU
NCT06605079 RECRUITING NA