A Study to Assess Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00077857

Last Updated: 2013-05-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

470 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 2 arm study compared the efficacy and safety of label dose of capecitabine (Xeloda®) to that of a lower dose of Xeloda® plus docetaxel (Taxotere®) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after failure of chemotherapy with an anthracycline. Patients were randomized to receive either 1250 mg/m\^2 or 825 mg/m\^2 orally twice a day (po bid) on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with Taxotere® 75 mg/m2 intravenous (iv) on day 1 of each 3 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment was until disease progression and the target sample size was 440 individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1250 mg/m^2 capecitabine + docetaxel

1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

capecitabine (Xeloda®)

Intervention Type DRUG

825 mg/m\^2 or 1250 mg/m2 orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle.

docetaxel (Taxotere®)

Intervention Type DRUG

75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

825 mg/m^2 capecitabine + docetaxel

825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

capecitabine (Xeloda®)

Intervention Type DRUG

825 mg/m\^2 or 1250 mg/m2 orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle.

docetaxel (Taxotere®)

Intervention Type DRUG

75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

capecitabine (Xeloda®)

825 mg/m\^2 or 1250 mg/m2 orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

docetaxel (Taxotere®)

75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xeloda® Taxotere®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women \>=18 years of age;
* \>=1 target lesion;
* locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer;
* demonstrated resistance to anthracycline;
* \>=2 regimens of chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* previous treatment with Xeloda, continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion, or other oral fluoropyrimidines;
* previous treatment with paclitaxel or docetaxel for advanced/metastatic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hoover, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Poway, California, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Inverness, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Shores, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Beech Grove, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Houma, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Paramus, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Collierville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Colchester, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Abingdon, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

Mostar, , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Site Status

Sarajevo, , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Site Status

Tuzla, , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Bengbu, , China

Site Status

Dalian, , China

Site Status

Dalian, , China

Site Status

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Tábor, , Czechia

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Kochi, , India

Site Status

Kolkata, , India

Site Status

Ludhiana, , India

Site Status

Manipal, , India

Site Status

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Trivandrum, , India

Site Status

Vellore, , India

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Polokwane, , South Africa

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bosnia and Herzegovina China Czechia India Poland Russia South Africa Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NO16853

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00083200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.