Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (NCT NCT00077857)
NCT ID: NCT00077857
Last Updated: 2013-05-10
Results Overview
Progression Free Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death due to any cause.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
470 participants
Event driven (after 350 events). Median observation time was approximately 16 months.
2013-05-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
235
|
235
|
|
Overall Study
Received Study Drug
|
231
|
234
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population: Actual Dose Received
|
217
|
248
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
34
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
201
|
204
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
30
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
7
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Insufficient therapeutic response
|
112
|
128
|
|
Overall Study
Violation of selection criteria at entry
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other protocol violation
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Refused treatment
|
29
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Failure to return
|
5
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
15
|
13
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
Total
n=470 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
50.9 years
n=5 Participants
|
50.6 years
n=7 Participants
|
50.75 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
235 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
235 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
470 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Event driven (after 350 events). Median observation time was approximately 16 months.Population: Per protocol population included all participants who received at least one dose of study and who did not have any major protocol deviations.
Progression Free Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death due to any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=230 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=229 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Progression of Disease or Death
|
7.9 Months
Interval 6.9 to 8.5
|
5.8 Months
Interval 4.9 to 7.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until Progressive Disease (PD) or end of primary study treatment (up to 16 cycles) plus 28 days.Population: Intent to treat population included all randomized participants.
According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir sum LD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response Being Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
|
45.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 38.6 to 51.7
|
37.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.2 to 44.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until PD or end of primary study treatment (up to 16 cycles) plus 28 days.Population: Intent to treat population included all randomized participants.
For patients with Best Overall Response being Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), time to response was measured as the time from randomization to the first time when the measurement criteria for CR or PR were met. The percentage of participants with overall response within the given time ranges in each of the categories: Weeks 1-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24, 25-30, 31-36, and 43-48 are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 1-6
|
25 Percentage of participants
|
30 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 7-12
|
48 Percentage of participants
|
30 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 13-18
|
20 Percentage of participants
|
17 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 19-24
|
7 Percentage of participants
|
7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 25-30
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 31-36
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Time to Overall Response
Week 43-48
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until PD or death. Median duration of response was approximately 7 months.Population: Intent to treat population included all randomized participants.
Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were first met for Complete Response or Partial Response until the first date that progressive disease or death was documented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Overall Response
|
6.9 Months
Interval 6.1 to 8.6
|
6.9 Months
Interval 5.8 to 9.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until premature withdrawal or end of primary study treatment (up to 16 cycles).Population: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to 1250 mg/m\^2 actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so are included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
The time to treatment failure was the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of any of the following events: * adverse events * insufficient therapeutic response (disease progression) * death * failure to return * refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate * withdrawing consent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=217 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=248 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Treatment Failure
|
5.1 Months
Interval 4.2 to 5.8
|
4.6 Months
Interval 4.1 to 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Throughout the study. Median observation time was approximately 16 months.Population: Intent to treat population included all randomized participants.
Overall Survival was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=235 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
16.4 Months
Interval 13.6 to 21.8
|
15.1 Months
Interval 12.9 to 17.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First study drug intake until last study drug intake plus 28 daysPopulation: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to 1250 mg/m\^2 actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so are included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
An adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is Life-Threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Additional information about Adverse Events can be found in the Adverse Event Section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=217 Participants
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=248 Participants
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Adverse Events
|
206 Participants
|
234 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events
|
41 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
Adverse Events
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=217 participants at risk
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=248 participants at risk
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
6.0%
13/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
5.6%
14/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
2.8%
6/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
1.6%
4/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.92%
2/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis all
|
2.3%
5/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.92%
2/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.92%
2/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
1.2%
3/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.92%
2/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infiltration
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Organising pneumonia
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
1.2%
3/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chest wall abscess
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Labyrinthitis
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nail infection
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic sepsis
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to central nervous system
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.81%
2/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain herniation
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis acute
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-Plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
1.4%
3/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Quadriparesis
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Acute psychosis
|
0.46%
1/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.00%
0/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
0.40%
1/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
1250 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=217 participants at risk
1250 mg/m\^2 capecitabine (Xeloda®) orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
825 mg/m^2 Capecitabine + Docetaxel
n=248 participants at risk
825 mg/m\^2 capecitabine orally twice a day on days 1 to 14 of each 3 week cycle, in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous on day 1 of each 3 week cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis all
|
40.1%
87/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
35.5%
88/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
33.6%
73/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
32.7%
81/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.7%
45/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
23.4%
58/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
15.2%
33/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
18.1%
45/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.8%
17/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
6.9%
17/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.5%
14/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
3.6%
9/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-Plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
47.0%
102/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
41.9%
104/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
34.1%
74/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
33.1%
82/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
|
12.0%
26/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
15.3%
38/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
6.5%
14/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
5.2%
13/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
26.7%
58/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
20.2%
50/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
16.1%
35/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
10.9%
27/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
12.0%
26/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
13.7%
34/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
8.3%
18/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
10.5%
26/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
35.5%
77/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
28.2%
70/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
9.7%
21/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
6.9%
17/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.0%
13/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
6.0%
15/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
7.4%
16/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
8.9%
22/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
5.5%
12/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
7.7%
19/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.7%
8/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
5.6%
14/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
13.8%
30/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
14.5%
36/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
8.3%
18/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
6.0%
15/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
5.1%
11/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
2.8%
7/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
6.9%
15/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
12.5%
31/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.5%
14/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
4.8%
12/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
6.0%
13/217
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
4.0%
10/248
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug. Note: 14 patients randomized to the 1250 mg/m\^2 arm actual received an initial dose that ranged from 480 to 984 mg/m\^2 so were included in the 825 mg/m\^2 arm for safety.
|
Additional Information
Medical Communications
Hoffman-LaRoche
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER