Comparison of Two Radiation Therapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00062309
Last Updated: 2016-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
307 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing two different regimens of radiation therapy to see how well they work in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Hypo-fractionated Proton Radiation for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT01230866
High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT01655836
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Treating Prostate Cancer High-Risk Features Following Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03570827
Radiation Therapy and Hormone Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT00769548
Phase II High Dose Brachytherapy and Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT02960087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Compare the efficacy of conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs hypofractionated IMRT, in terms of freedom from biochemical failure in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.
* Compare the local control, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine local failure, using biopsy of the prostate, when objective tests (prostate-specific antigen, ultrasound, and digital rectal exam) suggest relapse in these patients.
* Compare the extent of disease eradication using biopsy of the prostate at 2 years after therapy in these patients.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the impact of these regimens on patient preferences and utilities.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (no greater than 10 ng/mL vs greater than 10 to 20 ng/mL vs greater than 20 ng/mL), Gleason score (5-7 vs 8-10), and risk status (high risk vs intermediate risk). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients undergo conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 5 days a week for 7.5 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients undergo hypofractionated IMRT 5 days a week for 5 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with high-risk disease also undergo androgen deprivation therapy for 2 years.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually for 4 years.
Patients are followed at 3 months, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 300 patients (150 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CIMRT
76 Gy in 38 fractions
radiation therapy
HIMRT
70.2 Gy in 26 fractions
radiation therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
radiation therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Clinical stage T1b-T3c disease
* No clinical or radiographic evidence of metastasis
* Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 80 ng/mL
* Gleason score at least 5
* One of the following criteria must be met:
* PSA greater than 10 ng/mL
* Gleason score greater than 6
* T2b or greater palpable disease
* Three or more biopsy cores involved with a Gleason score of at least 5
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
* Not specified
Performance status
* Zubrod 0-1
Life expectancy
* Not specified
Hematopoietic
* Not specified
Hepatic
* Not specified
Renal
* Not specified
Other
* No other medical condition that would preclude study participation
* No other active malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmetastatic skin cancer or early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (well-differentiated small cell lymphocytic leukemia)
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
* Not specified
Chemotherapy
* Not specified
Endocrine therapy
* No more than 4 months of prior androgen deprivation therapy
* Neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy is allowed for high-risk disease only
Radiotherapy
* No prior pelvic radiotherapy
Surgery
* No prior or planned radical prostate surgery
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Fox Chase Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Buyyounouski, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pollack A, Bae K, Khor LY, et al.: Stability of tumor biomarkers in archival tissue from men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of RTOG 92-02 and Fox Chase randomized trials. [Abstract] Int J Biol Markers 22 (1): 72-3, 2006.
Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, Hallman MA, Greenberg RE, Price RA Jr, Leachman B, Uzzo RG, Ma C, Chen D, Geynisman DM, Sobczak ML, Zhang E, Wong JK, Pollack A, Horwitz EM. Ten-Year Update of a Randomized, Prospective Trial of Conventional Fractionated Versus Moderate Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-1684. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01485. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM, Price R, Feigenberg S, Konski AA, Stoyanova R, Movsas B, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG, Ma C, Buyyounouski MK. Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3860-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1972. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FCCC-02602
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000304712
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.