Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
229 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-04-30
2006-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Constraint-Based Therapy to Improve Motor Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT00061139
Early Childhood Constraint Therapy in Cerebral Palsy
NCT02567630
Effects of Forms of Modified CIT on Upper Extremity Performance in Cerebral Palsy
NCT01643239
Mobility Exercises for Gait (MEG Neuroplasticity Project)
NCT03555708
Physical, Functional and Neural Effects of Two Lower Extremity Exercise Protocols in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT01086670
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CI movement therapy, or "forced use," involves motor restriction of the less effected upper extremity for 2 weeks. Over this time, repetitive use of the more effected upper extremity is promoted for many hours a day. This treatment produces long lasting improvements in extremity use among patients who are more than 1 year post-stroke and who have an ability to initiate some extension in wrist and digit joints.
This study will determine if CI therapy for a hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with sub-acute (3 to 9 months post-cerebral infarct) stroke will lead to functional improvements and enhanced quality of life measures more than usual care.
Patients are randomized into a treatment or usual care group and stratified by movement capability into higher and lower functioning categories. Higher functioning patients are defined as those who have at least 20 degrees of active wrist extension and 10 degrees of active finger extension at each digit joint. Lower functioning patients are defined as those with at least 10 degrees of wrist extension and 10 degrees of extension at each thumb joint and all joints of two other digits. Patients randomized into the control group receive treatment one year later to permit replication efforts for findings using this therapy in patients with chronic stroke.
The intervention consists of making patients use their impaired arms by constraining movement in the less impaired limb for most waking hours over a 2 week period. The constraint is a taped splint in which the hand rests to prevent limb use but enable protective responses. A micro-switch within the splint will permit monitoring of contact time (wearing). Each weekday for 2 weeks, patients come to the clinic/laboratory for specific task training. Evaluations in laboratory and actual use tests are made prior to treatment, 2 weeks later, and at 4 month intervals thereafter. Changes in psychosocial functioning will also be measured. Primary outcomes include the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Motor Activity Log. Secondary outcomes include Stroke Impact Scale, Actual Amount of Use Test, and accelerometry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Constraint-induced movement therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2.5 or lower on the Motor Activity Log scale
* \>= 10 degrees of active wrist extension
* \>= 10 degrees of extension of all joints of thumb and two other digits
* Ability to perform wrist/finger extension movements three times within one minute
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven L Wolf, PhD/PT/FAPTA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981 Jul;61(7):1022-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/61.7.1022.
Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989 May;104(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(89)80005-6.
Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW 3rd, DeLuca SC, Miller NE. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Mar;61(2):281-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281.
Taub E: Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In Ince LP (ed.) Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York: Williams Wilkins, 1980, 370-401
Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):347-54.
Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE: Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In J. Toole (ed.), Imaging and Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York::Demos, 1996, 133-154.
Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint Induced Movement Techniques To Facilitate Upper Extremity Use in Stroke Patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997 Jan;3(4):38-61. doi: 10.1080/10749357.1997.11754128.
Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001 Jul;3(4):279-86. doi: 10.1007/s11883-001-0020-0.
Duncan PW. Synthesis of Intervention Trials To Improve Motor Recovery following Stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997 Jan;3(4):1-20. doi: 10.1080/10749357.1997.11754126.
Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist. 2002 Nov;8(6):325-38. doi: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000031014.85777.76.
Clark PC, Shields CG, Aycock D, Wolf SL. Preliminary reliability and validity of a family caregiver conflict scale for stroke. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Spring;18(2):77-82, 92.
Butler AJ, Wolf SL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess cortical plasticity: a critical perspective for stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):20-6. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010106.
Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Nichols D, Wolf S. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 Sep;17(3):137-52. doi: 10.1177/0888439003255511.
Aycock DM, Blanton S, Clark PC, Wolf SL. What is constraint-induced therapy? Rehabil Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):114-5, 121. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2004.tb00326.x. No abstract available.
Park SW, Butler AJ, Cavalheiro V, Alberts JL, Wolf SL. Changes in serial optical topography and TMS during task performance after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke: a case study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004 Jun;18(2):95-105. doi: 10.1177/0888439004265113.
Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Campana GI, Parris TA, Struys DM, Weinstein SR, Weiss P. Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;115(8):1740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.027.
Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D; EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17):2095-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.
Schweighofer N, Ye D, Luo H, D'Argenio DZ, Winstein C. Long-term forecasting of a motor outcome following rehabilitation in chronic stroke via a hierarchical bayesian dynamic model. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jun 29;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01202-y.
Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, Morris DM, Uswatte G, Taub E, Light KE, Sawaki L. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2309-15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Blanton S, Nichols-Larsen D, Clark PC. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jan;7(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70294-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.