Improving Arm Mobility and Use After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT00057018

Last Updated: 2016-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

229 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-04-30

Study Completion Date

2006-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An individual suffering a stroke or other brain injury may lose function on one side of the body (partial paralysis). As the individual shifts activities to favor the unaffected side, the problem worsens. Constraint induced (CI) therapy forces the individual to use the neglected arm by restraining the good arm in a sling. This study examines the effectiveness of CI therapy for improving arm motion after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Profoundly impaired motor dysfunction is a major consequence of stroke. As a result, a large number of the more than 700,000 people in America sustaining a stroke each year have limitations in motor ability and compromised quality of life. Therapeutic interventions designed to enhance motor function and promote independent use of an impaired upper extremity are quite limited.

CI movement therapy, or "forced use," involves motor restriction of the less effected upper extremity for 2 weeks. Over this time, repetitive use of the more effected upper extremity is promoted for many hours a day. This treatment produces long lasting improvements in extremity use among patients who are more than 1 year post-stroke and who have an ability to initiate some extension in wrist and digit joints.

This study will determine if CI therapy for a hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with sub-acute (3 to 9 months post-cerebral infarct) stroke will lead to functional improvements and enhanced quality of life measures more than usual care.

Patients are randomized into a treatment or usual care group and stratified by movement capability into higher and lower functioning categories. Higher functioning patients are defined as those who have at least 20 degrees of active wrist extension and 10 degrees of active finger extension at each digit joint. Lower functioning patients are defined as those with at least 10 degrees of wrist extension and 10 degrees of extension at each thumb joint and all joints of two other digits. Patients randomized into the control group receive treatment one year later to permit replication efforts for findings using this therapy in patients with chronic stroke.

The intervention consists of making patients use their impaired arms by constraining movement in the less impaired limb for most waking hours over a 2 week period. The constraint is a taped splint in which the hand rests to prevent limb use but enable protective responses. A micro-switch within the splint will permit monitoring of contact time (wearing). Each weekday for 2 weeks, patients come to the clinic/laboratory for specific task training. Evaluations in laboratory and actual use tests are made prior to treatment, 2 weeks later, and at 4 month intervals thereafter. Changes in psychosocial functioning will also be measured. Primary outcomes include the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Motor Activity Log. Secondary outcomes include Stroke Impact Scale, Actual Amount of Use Test, and accelerometry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebrovascular Accident

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Constraint-induced movement therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 3 to 9 months post cerebral infarct or 1 year post injury
* 2.5 or lower on the Motor Activity Log scale
* \>= 10 degrees of active wrist extension
* \>= 10 degrees of extension of all joints of thumb and two other digits
* Ability to perform wrist/finger extension movements three times within one minute
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven L Wolf, PhD/PT/FAPTA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981 Jul;61(7):1022-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/61.7.1022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7243897 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989 May;104(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(89)80005-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2707361 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW 3rd, DeLuca SC, Miller NE. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Mar;61(2):281-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8169577 (View on PubMed)

Taub E: Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In Ince LP (ed.) Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York: Williams Wilkins, 1980, 370-401

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):347-54.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8466415 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE: Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In J. Toole (ed.), Imaging and Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York::Demos, 1996, 133-154.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint Induced Movement Techniques To Facilitate Upper Extremity Use in Stroke Patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997 Jan;3(4):38-61. doi: 10.1080/10749357.1997.11754128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27620374 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001 Jul;3(4):279-86. doi: 10.1007/s11883-001-0020-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11389792 (View on PubMed)

Duncan PW. Synthesis of Intervention Trials To Improve Motor Recovery following Stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997 Jan;3(4):1-20. doi: 10.1080/10749357.1997.11754126.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27620372 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist. 2002 Nov;8(6):325-38. doi: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000031014.85777.76.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12801434 (View on PubMed)

Clark PC, Shields CG, Aycock D, Wolf SL. Preliminary reliability and validity of a family caregiver conflict scale for stroke. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Spring;18(2):77-82, 92.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12732800 (View on PubMed)

Butler AJ, Wolf SL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess cortical plasticity: a critical perspective for stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):20-6. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12817653 (View on PubMed)

Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Nichols D, Wolf S. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 Sep;17(3):137-52. doi: 10.1177/0888439003255511.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14503435 (View on PubMed)

Aycock DM, Blanton S, Clark PC, Wolf SL. What is constraint-induced therapy? Rehabil Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):114-5, 121. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2004.tb00326.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15222091 (View on PubMed)

Park SW, Butler AJ, Cavalheiro V, Alberts JL, Wolf SL. Changes in serial optical topography and TMS during task performance after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke: a case study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004 Jun;18(2):95-105. doi: 10.1177/0888439004265113.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15228805 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Campana GI, Parris TA, Struys DM, Weinstein SR, Weiss P. Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Aug;115(8):1740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15261852 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D; EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17):2095-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17077374 (View on PubMed)

Schweighofer N, Ye D, Luo H, D'Argenio DZ, Winstein C. Long-term forecasting of a motor outcome following rehabilitation in chronic stroke via a hierarchical bayesian dynamic model. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jun 29;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01202-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37386512 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, Morris DM, Uswatte G, Taub E, Light KE, Sawaki L. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2309-15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723. Epub 2010 Sep 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20814005 (View on PubMed)

Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Blanton S, Nichols-Larsen D, Clark PC. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jan;7(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70294-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18077218 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD037606

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Arm More + Camp: An Implementation Study
NCT07065916 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA