Combination Chemotherapy and Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00049569

Last Updated: 2013-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for cancer cell growth. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with imatinib mesylate may kill more cancer cells. Randomized phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy and imatinib mesylate in treating children who have relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the feasibility and safety of using an intensified sequential induction regimen to treat children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), who experience an isolated, or combined bone marrow relapse.

II. To determine the potential of this regimen to serve, as a backbone, for the future testing of novel therapeutic agents.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the remission re-induction rates and four-month event-free survival (EFS) for children, stratified by the duration of first remission.

II. To determine the feasibility of measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) quantitatively in all patients at time points throughout re-induction, and to correlate post-remission events with disease burden during induction.

III. To use deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) arrays to characterize patterns of gene expression that predict treatment failure, and to compare gene expression profiles at the time of relapse with those at the time of initial diagnosis to gain an understanding of the pathways that may be involved in disease recurrence.

IV. To determine the feasibility of combining intensive re-induction therapy with imatinib mesylate (STI571) for children with a relapse of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I:

Treatment Block 1: Patients receive cytarabine intrathecally (IT) on day 1 and methotrexate IT on days 15 and 29. Patients also receive vincristine intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; prednisone orally (PO) twice or thrice daily (BID or TID) on days 1-29; pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 2, 8, 15, and 22; and doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes on day 1. Ph-positive patients also receive imatinib mesylate PO on days 1-14.

Treatment Block 2: Patients receive methotrexate IT on days 1 and 22, cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes and etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients also receive methotrexate IV over 24 hours on day 22 followed by leucovorin calcium IV every 6 hours on days 24 and 25. Ph-positive patients receive imatinib mesylate PO on days 1-14.

Treatment Block 3a (Ph-negative patients): Patients receive cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1, 2, 8, and 9, asparaginase IM on days 2 and 9, and G-CSF SC beginning on day 10 and continuing until blood counts recover.

Treatment Block 3b (Ph-positive patients): Patients receive cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1 and 2, asparaginase IM on day 2, and G-CSF SC beginning on day 3 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients also receive imatinib mesylate PO on days 1-14.

ARM II:

Treatment Block 1: Patients receive cytarabine IT on day 1 and then methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone IT (triple intrathecal therapy; TIT) on days 8, 15, 22, and 29. Vincristine, prednisone, pegaspargase, doxorubicin, and imatinib mesylate are administered as in arm I.

Treatment Block 3: Patients receive cytarabine, asparaginase, G-CSF, and imatinib mesylate as in arm I.

Treatment Block 2: Patients receive TIT on days 1 and 22. Patients then receive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, G-CSF, methotrexate IV, leucovorin calcium, and imatinib mesylate as in arm I. After each block is completed, disease is assessed. The next block is started on day 36 if blood counts have recovered and marrow during block 1 is at least M2/M3. Patients are removed from protocol therapy if disease progresses, unacceptable toxicity occurs, marrow is M2/M3 at day 15 of the second administered block of treatment, or cerebrospinal fluid blasts persist after 6 weekly doses of TIT.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 4 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 63-126 patients will be accrued for this study within 14 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

L1 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia L2 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Non-T, Non-B Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Recurrent Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia T-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

See detailed description.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

imatinib mesylate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given SC

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

Arm II

See detailed description.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

imatinib mesylate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given SC

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

therapeutic hydrocortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cytarabine

Given IT

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Given IT

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Given IM

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

imatinib mesylate

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

filgrastim

Given SC

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

leucovorin calcium

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

asparaginase

Given IM

Intervention Type DRUG

therapeutic hydrocortisone

Given IT

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first relapse involving the bone marrow (M3 marrow), with or without associated extramedullary disease; this includes patients who are Philadelphia chromosome-positive
* Shortening fraction of \>= 28% by echocardiogram, or ejection fraction of \>= 50% by gated radionuclide study
* Cumulative prior anthracycline exposure of =\< 350 mg/m\^2 (each 10 mg/m\^2 dose of idarubicin should be calculated as the isotoxic equivalent of 50 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin or adriamycin)
* All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent
* All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with B-cell ALL (L3 morphology or evidence of myc translocation by molecular or cytogenetic technique) are not eligible
* Patients with Down syndrome are excluded due to the administration of methotrexate in Block 2
* Patients who have undergone prior stem cell transplantation (SCT) are ineligible if:

* They received SCT less than 12 months prior to study entry
* They are still receiving immunosuppression for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
* They have active fungal infection at time of study entry
* They have had invasive filamentous fungal infection at any time post-SCT
* Pregnant or lactating females are ineligible as the medications used in this protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants
* Patients with prior isolated extramedullary relapse are ineligible
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth Raetz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Oncology Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Oncology Group

Arcadia, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Canada Netherlands New Zealand Puerto Rico Switzerland United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2012-01798

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

COG-AALL01P2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000258120

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AALL01P2

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AALL01P2

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U10CA098543

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NCI-2012-01798

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id