Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00002812

Last Updated: 2013-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2078 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1996-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the outcomes in children with higher risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) treated with postinduction chemotherapy based on marrow response on day 7 of induction therapy: for patients with rapid early response (M1/M2), standard vs intensified consolidation chemotherapy and standard vs prolonged duration of intensification chemotherapy; for patients with slow early response, addition of doxorubicin vs idarubicin and cyclophosphamide to intensification chemotherapy. II. Decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis by alternating dexamethasone dosing in patients undergoing 2 courses of delayed intensification. III. Assess the impact of day 7 marrow status on outcome in these patients. IV. Determine prognosis more precisely by supplementing presenting clinical features, immunophenotype, ploidy, cytogenetics, and early marrow response with BAX/BCL-2 ratios, pattern of tyrosine kinase activation, leukemic burden following induction and intensification therapy, and development of high antibody titer to E. coli asparaginase. V. Correlate the traditional prognostic factors of day 7 marrow response, immunophenotype, ploidy, cytogenetics, and early marrow response with BAX/BCL-2 ratios.

OUTLINE: This is a partially randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center. Patients receive one course of the VPLD regimen comprised of vincristine IV and daunorubicin IV over 15 minutes to 2 hours on days 0 and 7, oral prednisone daily on days 0-7, intrathecal cytarabine on day 0, and asparaginase or pegaspargase intramuscularly on days 3, 5, and 7. Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 two postinduction chemotherapy groups based on bone marrow response on day 7 of induction. Patients with M1/M2 marrow on day 7 are considered rapid early responders. Patients with M3 marrow on day 7 are considered slow early responders. Group 1: Rapid early responders Patients receive 2 additional courses of VPLD induction chemotherapy. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Arm I: Beginning on day 35 of induction therapy, patients receive standard Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) regimen with standard delayed intensification. Standard BFM for patients in arm I consists of the following: consolidation over 5 weeks with cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and mercaptopurine; interim maintenance over 8 weeks with oral methotrexate and mercaptopurine (MTX/MP); and delayed intensification over 7 weeks consisting of reinduction with vincristine, doxorubicin, oral dexamethasone, and asparaginase or pegaspargase followed by reconsolidation with cyclophosphamide, thioguanine, and cytarabine. Arm II: Patients receive standard BFM regimen with double delayed intensification. Patients receive therapy similar to those in arm I, but dexamethasone is interrupted for 1 week during delayed intensification and the intensification regimen is repeated, separated by an 8 week interim maintenance course of oral MTX/MP. Arm III: Patients receive augmented BFM regimen with standard delayed intensification. Patients receive 9 weeks of consolidation therapy with 2 courses of vincristine and pegaspargase alternating with the arm I consolidation therapy. Vincristine, intravenous methotrexate, and pegaspargase (the Capizzi I regimen) are substituted for oral MTX/MP in the interim maintenance regimen. Pegaspargase is substituted for asparaginase and two additional doses of vincristine are administered during delayed intensification. Arm IV: Patients receive augmented BFM regimen with double delayed intensification. Patients receive intensified chemotherapy throughout, combining the additional therapy given to patients in arms II and III. Patients receiving augmented BFM regimen receive pegaspargase instead of asparaginase. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis are treated only on arm IV. Patients who are Philadelphia chromosome positive and do not have a bone marrow donor are nonrandomly assigned to the treatment group for slow early responders. All RER patients receive the same maintenance therapy with vincristine/prednisone and oral MTX/MP. Intrathecal methotrexate is administered periodically throughout protocol treatment. Group 2: Slow early responders Patients receive augmented BFM consolidation therapy and Capizzi I interim maintenance identical to that received by rapid early responders in arm IV. Patients are then randomized to receive double delayed intensification with either idarubicin or doxorubicin and concurrent cyclophosphamide. All patients receive the same maintenance therapy with vincristine/prednisone and oral MTX/MP. Intrathecal MTX is administered periodically throughout protocol treatment. Patients with CNS disease at entry receive craniospinal irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days beginning on day 0 of consolidation therapy. All slow early responders at diagnosis receive cranial irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days during consolidation therapy. Patients with testicular leukemia at diagnosis receive bilateral testicular irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days during consolidation chemotherapy. Groups 1 and 2: Maintenance therapy continues for 2 years for girls or 3 years for boys beyond completion of consolidation therapy. Patients are followed every 4-6 weeks for 1 year, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 1,520 patients will be accrued for this study over 4 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia L1 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia L2 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A - Standard BFM of Standard Duration (RER)

Induction chemotherapy Days 0 - 7. Prednisone 60 mg/m² PO 4 x day. Vincristine sulfate 1.5 mg/m² IV push weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. Daunomycin (daunorubicin hydrochloride) 25 mg/m² IV push (over 15 min.) weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. IT Cytosine Arabinoside (cytarabine, Ara-C) Day 0. Asparaginase 6000 IU/m² IM x 3 Days 3, 5, and 7. Day 7 Bone Marrow. Consolidation (Phase II) (5 weeks) Prednisone Taper, cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), mercaptopurine, vincristine sulfate, pegaspargase, IT Methotrexate and radiation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Arm B - Standard BFM with Double Delayed Intensification (RER)

Induction chemotherapy Days 0 - 7. Prednisone 60 mg/m² PO 4 x day. Vincristine sulfate 1.5 mg/m² IV push weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. Daunomycin (daunorubicin hydrochloride) 25 mg/m² IV push (over 15 min.) weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. IT Cytosine Arabinoside (cytarabine, Ara-C) Day 0. Asparaginase 6000 IU/m² IM x 3 Days 3, 5, and 7. Day 7 Bone Marrow Consolidation (5 weeks) (Phase II) Prednisone Taper, cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), mercaptopurine, vincristine sulfate, pegaspargase, IT Methotrexate and radiation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Arm C - Augumented BFM of Standard Duration (RER)

Induction chemotherapy Days 0 - 7. Prednisone 60 mg/m² PO 4 x day. Vincristine sulfate 1.5 mg/m² IV push weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. Daunomycin (daunorubicin hydrochloride) 25 mg/m² IV push (over 15 min.) weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. IT Cytosine Arabinoside (cytarabine, Ara-C) Day 0. Asparaginase 6000 IU/m² IM x 3 Days 3, 5, and 7. Day 7 Bone Marrow Consolidation (9 weeks) (Phase II) Prednisone Taper, cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), mercaptopurine, vincristine sulfate, pegaspargase, IT Methotrexate and radiation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Arm D - Augmented BFM with Dbl Delayed Intensification (RER)

Induction chemotherapy Days 0 - 7. Prednisone 60 mg/m² PO 4 x day. Vincristine sulfate 1.5 mg/m² IV push weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. Daunomycin (daunorubicin hydrochloride) 25 mg/m² IV push (over 15 min.) weekly x 2 Days 0 and 7. IT Cytosine Arabinoside (cytarabine, Ara-C) Day 0. Asparaginase 6000 IU/m² IM x 3 Days 3, 5, and 7. Day 7 Bone Marrow Consolidation (9 weeks) (Phase II) Prednisone Taper, cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), mercaptopurine, vincristine sulfate, pegaspargase, IT Methotrexate and radiation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

idarubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

asparaginase

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

idarubicin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

mercaptopurine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

thioguanine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

E. coli Elspar NSC-109229 Cytoxan NSC-26271 Cytosine Arabinoside Ara-C Cytosar-U NSC-63878 Daunomycin Hydrochloride Cerrubidine NSC-82151 Decadron NSC-34521 Adriamycin NSC-123127 Idarubicin Hydrochloride Idamycin NSC-256439 6-MP Purinethol NSC-755 NSC-740 Asparaginase Oncaspar NSC-10023 6-TG NSC-752 Oncovin NSC-67574

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) with M3 bone marrow No FAB L3 morphology CNS or overt testicular leukemia at diagnosis allowed High risk status 10-21 years old with any white blood count (WBC) 1-9 years old with WBC of 50,000/mm3 or greater

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 1 to 21 Performance status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy for ALL except: Emergency therapy for blast crisis, superior vena cava syndrome, or renal failure due to leukemic infiltration Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Intrathecal cytarabine or methotrexate allowed at diagnostic lumbar puncture Induction therapy must begin within 72 hours after intrathecal injection Endocrine therapy: At least 1-2 months since prior prednisone, for less than 48 hours, for reactive airway disease Inhalational steroids allowed Radiotherapy: Not specified Surgery: Not specified
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nita L. Seibel, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Children's National Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Orange County

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Cancer Center and Cancer Research Institute

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Cancer Research Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Cancer Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at The University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Cancer Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Saint Peter's University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Medical Center - Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ireland Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Columbus

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Doernbecher Children's Hospital

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center - Seattle

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

British Columbia Children's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

IWK Health Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18818707 (View on PubMed)

Butturini AM, Dorey FJ, Lange BJ, Henry DW, Gaynon PS, Fu C, Franklin J, Siegel SE, Seibel NL, Rogers PC, Sather H, Trigg M, Bleyer WA, Carroll WL. Obesity and outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2063-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.7792.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17513811 (View on PubMed)

Avramis VI, Panosyan EH. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations: the past, the present and recommendations for the future. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(4):367-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544040-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15828851 (View on PubMed)

Seibel NL, Asselin BL, Nachman JB, et al.: Treatment of high risk T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL): comparison of recent experience of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) and Pediatric Oncology Group (POG). [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-681, 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Arce FJ, Seibel N, Gaynon PS, et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of asparaginases in antibody-negative pediatric patients with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a report from CCG-1961. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-9027, 508s, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Avramis VI, Ettinger L, Martin-Aragon S, et al.: Anti-asparaginase (ASNase) antibody (Ab) in pediatric patients in high risk ALL study (CCG-1961): correlation of Ab and clinical allergy. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A2319, 2000.

Reference Type RESULT

Avramis VI, Panosyan E, Avramis IA, et al.: Anti-asparaginase (ASNase) antibody (Ab) and ASNase activity in children with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR ALL) (CCG-1961). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1592, 2002.

Reference Type RESULT

Bhojwani D, Kang H, Menezes RX, Yang W, Sather H, Moskowitz NP, Min DJ, Potter JW, Harvey R, Hunger SP, Seibel N, Raetz EA, Pieters R, Horstmann MA, Relling MV, den Boer ML, Willman CL, Carroll WL; Children's Oncology Group Study; Dutch Childhood Oncology Group; German Cooperative Study Group for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Gene expression signatures predictive of early response and outcome in high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study [corrected]. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 20;26(27):4376-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4519.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18802149 (View on PubMed)

Dhall G, Jones T, Radvinsky D, et al.: Adverse reactions to PEG and Erwinia asparaginase and correlation with anti-asparaginase antibody data and survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group study CCG 1961. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-3077, 2009.

Reference Type RESULT

Dhall G, Robison NJ, Rubin JI, et al.: Incidence of adverse reactions to post-induction asparaginase (ASP) therapy in children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group Study CCG-1961. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-10021, 2008.

Reference Type RESULT

Freyer DR, Devidas M, La M, Carroll WL, Gaynon PS, Hunger SP, Seibel NL. Postrelapse survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is independent of initial treatment intensity: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2011 Mar 17;117(11):3010-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294678. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21193696 (View on PubMed)

Freyer DR, Seibel NL, La MK, et al.: Survival after relapse in higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children and adolescents is independent of prior treatment intensity: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG). [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-917, 2008.

Reference Type RESULT

Hastings C, Sather HN, Seibel NL, et al.: Outcomes in children and adolescents with a markedly elevated white blood cell count (>200,000) at diagnosis of high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a report from the Children's Oncology Group. [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-1870, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Hastings C, Whitlock JA, La M, et al.: Improved outcome of children with Down syndrome (DS) and high risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (HR-ALL): a report of CCG-1961. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-586, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Henze G. Early postinduction intensification therapy is essential in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008 Sep;5(9):502-3. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1184. Epub 2008 Jul 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18648353 (View on PubMed)

Mattano LA Jr, Devidas M, Nachman JB, Sather HN, Hunger SP, Steinherz PG, Gaynon PS, Seibel NL; Children's Oncology Group. Effect of alternate-week versus continuous dexamethasone scheduling on the risk of osteonecrosis in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the CCG-1961 randomised cohort trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13(9):906-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70274-7. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22901620 (View on PubMed)

Nachman JB, La MK, Hunger SP, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Hastings C, Mattano LA Jr, Sather H, Devidas M, Freyer DR, Steinherz PG, Seibel NL. Young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have an excellent outcome with chemotherapy alone and benefit from intensive postinduction treatment: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5189-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8959. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19805689 (View on PubMed)

Nachman J, Siebel N, Sather H, et al.: Outcome for adolescent and young adults 16-21 years of age (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated on the Children' s Cancer Group (CCG) 1961 study. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-683, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Panosyan EH, Grigoryan RS, Avramis IA, Seibel NL, Gaynon PS, Siegel SE, Fingert HJ, Avramis VI. Deamination of glutamine is a prerequisite for optimal asparagine deamination by asparaginases in vivo (CCG-1961). Anticancer Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2C):1121-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15154634 (View on PubMed)

Panosyan EH, Seibel NL, Grigoryan RS, et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of three asparaginases in pediatric patients with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from CCG-1961. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-2745, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Panosyan EH, Seibel NL, Martin-Aragon S, Gaynon PS, Avramis IA, Sather H, Franklin J, Nachman J, Ettinger LJ, La M, Steinherz P, Cohen LJ, Siegel SE, Avramis VI; Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-1961. Asparaginase antibody and asparaginase activity in children with higher-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-1961. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Apr;26(4):217-26. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200404000-00002.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15087948 (View on PubMed)

Seibel NL, Steinherz PG, Sather HN, Nachman JB, Delaat C, Ettinger LJ, Freyer DR, Mattano LA Jr, Hastings CA, Rubin CM, Bertolone K, Franklin JL, Heerema NA, Mitchell TL, Pyesmany AF, La MK, Edens C, Gaynon PS. Early postinduction intensification therapy improves survival for children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2548-55. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-070342. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18039957 (View on PubMed)

Withycombe JS, Post-White JE, Meza JL, Hawks RG, Smith LM, Sacks N, Seibel NL. Weight patterns in children with higher risk ALL: A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for CCG 1961. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;53(7):1249-54. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22237.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19688832 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCG-1961

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000064953

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1961

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id