Using Drug Levels in the Blood to Guide Therapy in HIV Infected Patients Taking a Protease Inhibitor

NCT ID: NCT00041769

Last Updated: 2010-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-06-30

Study Completion Date

2007-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Drug resistance testing can be used to see which anti-HIV drugs are likely to suppress the growth of HIV and to select an anti-HIV regimen for HIV infected patients who have failed previous drug regimens. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a process that involves measuring blood levels of a drug and may further increase the benefits that resistance testing offers by optimizing protease inhibitor (PI) drug concentrations. The purpose of this study is to determine whether changing the dose of PIs, as indicated by TDM, reduces the viral load in PI-experienced patients.

Hypothesis: Treatment-naive study participants who undergo TDM and whose clinicians' interpret their TDM results and adjust their PI doses will have better virologic response rates and decreased toxicities (and thus better treatment outcomes) than participants who do not undergo TDM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of drug resistance testing to guide the selection of an antiretroviral regimen for patients in whom current therapy is failing has gained growing acceptance in clinical practice. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing has been associated with improved short-term virologic outcome in prospective interventional trials. There is also growing evidence that monitoring drug levels, particularly of PIs, may add to the benefit provided by resistance testing. This study will assess the impact of TDM and resistance testing on lowering viral load in treatment-experienced patients and will also evaluate the mean change in plasma HIV RNA from study entry to Step 2 of the study.

No antiretrovirals will be provided by this study. Participants will be followed for a maximum of 48 weeks. Participants failing at least one combination antiretroviral regimen will have a screening drug resistance test performed while remaining on the failing regimen. In Step 1, participants will begin a salvage antiretroviral regimen within 7 days of study entry selected by their clinician using results of the resistance test. Two weeks after initiation of the salvage regimen, participants will have timed plasma samples obtained for PI trough levels. The results of the trough level tests will be used to calculate a normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ) in order to determine eligibility for randomization into Step 2 at Week 4. Electrocardiograms (EKGs) and trough levels will be performed at Weeks 2, 6, and 10; support interviews to promote adherence will also be conducted by the study nurse or clinician at these times. Some participants taking tipranavir may have additional blood collection at Week 2.

In Step 2, participants with an NIQ of 1 or less will be randomly assigned to one of two arms. Arm A participants will receive standard care (SC) only, while participants in Arm B will receive SC plus dose-adjusted PIs based on the NIQ. Clinical and viral load assessment will be conducted at screening, entry, and Weeks 4, 10, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. Arm B participants will also have their PI trough levels checked at Weeks 6 and 10. Participants with an NIQ greater than 1 will be assigned to observational Arm C (open to up to 50 enrollees) or will stop their involvement in the study. Participants in Arms A, B, or C who have a viral load of 1000 copies/ml or higher or who experience virologic failure at or after Week 24 will be eligible to receive a second resistance test and enter Step 3.

Participants in Step 3 will begin a second salvage regimen; PI trough levels will be measured after 2, 6, and 10 weeks of salvage therapy. Those with an NIQ greater than 1, or with an NIQ of 1 or less and do not wish to escalate dose, will be followed on Step 3 for a maximum of 48 weeks after study entry.

All participants are encouraged to coenroll in ACTG A5128, Consent for Use of Stored Patient Specimens for Future Testing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HIV infected
* Viral load of 1000 copies/ml or more at study screening
* At least one viral load of 400 copies/ml or more within 6 months of study entry while on the failing antiretroviral regimen
* Virologic failure of at least one combination (two or more drugs) antiretroviral regimen, with at least one of these failing regimens containing a PI. Low dose ritonavir and hydroxyurea are not counted as antiretrovirals.
* Currently on a failing combination antiretroviral regimen
* Plan to initiate a salvage regimen containing a PI within 7 days of study entry
* Acceptable methods of contraception while receiving the study medications and for 6 weeks after stopping the medications. Participants who are currently taking efavirenz and who have undergone surgery to prevent conception (e.g., hysterectomy, tubal ligation, vasectomy) must provide physician's documentation of their current regimen and of their previous surgery.
* Resistance to at least one drug in the failing regimen, documented within 90 days of study entry
* Karnofsky performance scale of 70 or more within 30 days prior to study entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Growth factors, interleukins, interferons (except for the treatment of hepatitis C), non-FDA approved systemic drugs, and HIV vaccines within 30 days of study entry
* Require certain medications prior to or during the study
* Certain heart conditions, if starting a PI-based regimen as the salvage regimen
* Acute illness or infection requiring treatment within 14 days of study entry
* Any condition that would limit ability to participate in the study
* Cancer requiring radiation or systemic chemotherapy
* Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that would interfere with the ability to meet study requirements
* Acute or chronic pancreatitis
* Planned use of hydroxyurea in the salvage regimen
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Demeter, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Infectious Diseases Unit, University of Rochester Medical Center

Mary Albrecht, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Univ of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of California, San Diego Antiviral Research Center (AVRC)

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Mateo County AIDS Program

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Willow Clinic

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of Colorado Health Sciences Ctr

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Univ of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Univ of Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Univ

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The CORE Ctr

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hosp of Indiana

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana Univ Hosp

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wishard Hosp

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Univ of Maryland, Institute of Human Virology

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Univ

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Harvard (Masschusetts General Hosp)

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess-West Campus

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hosp

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Univ of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St. Louis Connect Care

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington Univ (St. Louis)

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

SUNY-Buffalo (Rochester)

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Chelsea Clinic

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York University - Bellevue

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Long Beach Memorial (Pediatric)

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia Univ

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Community Health Network Inc

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Univ of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke Univ Med Ctr

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio State Univ

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Univ of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Case Western Reserve Univ

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

MetroHealth Med Ctr

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Univ of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hosp

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Stanley Street Treatment and Resource

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

The Miriam Hosp

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Care Clinic

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Univ of Texas, Galveston

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Univ of Washington (Seattle)

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Puerto Rico

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clevenbergh P, Mouly S, Sellier P, Badsi E, Cervoni J, Vincent V, Trout H, Bergmann JF. Improving HIV infection management using antiretroviral plasma drug levels monitoring: a clinician's point of view. Curr HIV Res. 2004 Oct;2(4):309-21. doi: 10.2174/1570162043351129.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15544452 (View on PubMed)

Duong M, Golzi A, Peytavin G, Piroth L, Froidure M, Grappin M, Buisson M, Kohli E, Chavanet P, Portier H. Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in routine clinical practice. HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Jul-Aug;5(4):216-23. doi: 10.1310/NXJU-9ERQ-ADWW-UC5X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15472796 (View on PubMed)

Kiser JJ, Anderson PL, Gerber JG. Therapeutic drug monitoring: pharmacologic considerations for antiretroviral drugs. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2005 Jun;2(2):61-7. doi: 10.1007/s11904-005-0020-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16091250 (View on PubMed)

Rakhmanina NY, van den Anker JN, Soldin SJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004 Jan;18(1):7-14. doi: 10.1089/108729104322740866.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15006189 (View on PubMed)

Rendon A, Nunez M, Jimenez-Nacher I, Gonzalez de Requena D, Gonzalez-Lahoz J, Soriano V. Clinical benefit of interventions driven by therapeutic drug monitoring. HIV Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):360-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00321.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16156885 (View on PubMed)

DiFrancesco R, Rosenkranz S, Mukherjee AL, Demeter LM, Jiang H, DiCenzo R, Dykes C, Rinehart A, Albrecht M, Morse GD. Quality assessment for therapeutic drug monitoring in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG 5146): a multicenter clinical trial. Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Aug;32(4):458-66. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181e4427a.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20592644 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AACTG A5146

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACTG A5146

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.