Nonmyeloablative Preparative Regimen Using Mylotarg for Patients With High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT ID: NCT00038805
Last Updated: 2018-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2/PHASE3
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-05-31
2004-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of CMA-676 as part of an intensive but nonmyeloablative preparative regimen in older or medically infirm patients undergoing mini-allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate response rates, engraftment kinetics and degree of chimerism achievable with this strategy.
2. To evaluate disease-free and overall survival and relapse rates.
3. To evaluate the need and ability to give multiple cycles of Mylotarg plus FA and mobilized DLI in patients not achieving complete remission.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Allo Transplantation With Mylotarg, Fludarabine and Melphalan for AML, CML and MDS
NCT00038831
Mylotarg and Ara-C in Untreated Patients Above 60 Years With AML and High-Risk MDS
NCT00195000
Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01801046
Low-Dose or High-Dose Conditioning Followed by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00322101
Immunochemotherapy and AlloSCT in Patients With High Risk CD33+ AML/MDS
NCT02221310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal of this proposal is to include Mylotarg in a nonmyeloablative preparative regimen similar to FAI used at MD Anderson Cancer Center. The hypothesis is that Mylotarg will provide potent anti-leukemic effects without adding toxicity to the mini-allogeneic bone marrow transplant regimen. A more potent anti-leukemic response may increase the complete remission rates and induce a state of minimal residual disease (MRD). Therefore, the Graft vs. Leukemia (GVL) effect of allogeneic transplantation will have a better chance for success. In addition, the administration of donor cells after Mylotarg should ameliorate the cytopenias previously associated with Mylotarg. This medication likely will be well-tolerated.
Patients with high-risk hematopoietic malignancies that express CD33 (i.e. AML, ALL, CML and MDS) will be included. We will enroll older patients (\>55 years old) or medically infirm patients who are unable to tolerate standard allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Patients will be evaluated at 28 days post-transplant for evidence of response. Those with residual disease may be eligible for additional Mylotarg given together with donor lymphocyte infusions. Additional courses of Mylotarg may improve overall survival in this poor prognosis group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mylotarg
Mylotarg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mylotarg
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients are eligible if deemed ineligible for conventional high dose chemotherapy programs because of concurrent medical conditions. Patients with refractory AML are eligible provided ejection fraction \>= 35%; FEV1, FVC, or DLCO \>= 40%; GPT \< 3 x normal, direct bilirubin \< 2.
* Patients must have recovered from previous Grade III-IV toxicity due to prior antineoplastic therapy (except alopecia).
* Patients with AML with induction failure, relapse or 2nd remission
* Patients with MDS with IPI INT-2 or High-risk disease or CMML.
* Patients with CML in accelerated phase or blast crisis
* Patients with ALL with induction failure, relapse or 2nd remission
* Patients receiving prior BMT are eligible. If myeloablative chemoradiotherapy was used in the prior transplant patients must be \>90 days from transplant. If non-myeloablative therapy was used patients must be \>30 days post-transplant.
* Leukemia cells must express cell surface CD33 evaluated by flow cytometry in \> 20% of leukemia cells.
* Patients must have an HLA identical related donor capable of donating G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood stem cells using apheresis techniques. If patient has a contraindication to PBSC collection bone marrow can be used.
* Patients must have a Zubrod PS \<2, Cr \<2.0, direct bilirubin \<2, and transaminases SGPT \<3x normal
* Patients must have an estimated life expectancy \> 3 months
* Patient and donor must sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* no HIV disease
* no pregnancy and no nursing
* no active, uncontrolled CNS leukemia
55 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
INDUSTRY
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcos de Lima, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ID00-153
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.