Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2001-03-31
2002-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study subjects will include NEI clinic patients between 7 and 90 years of age with or without eye disease. Eye diseases include poor visual acuity, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal or choroid abnormality, amblyopia or other eye disease.
Participants will have their vision tested in each eye using both the ETDRS eye chart method and the MOBS method. The ETDRS method will require subjects to read all the letters on the chart until they can no longer see the details. For the MOBS method, they will read a single letter at a time that will appear on the computer screen. After reading each letter, a new letter will be presented that is either bigger or smaller in size. After completing the last acuity test, participants will fill out a questionnaire regarding their preference for one test type over the other.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Eye-tracking Based Amblyopia Training
NCT05078099
Screening for Research Participants
NCT00655096
Screening for Studies on Nystagmus and Strabismus
NCT00001861
Neural Mechanism of Vision Therapy for Patients With Convergence Insufficiency
NCT03593031
Validation of Computerized Vision-Targeted Quality-of-Life Questionnaires
NCT00678860
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The experimental protocol (EVA-MOBS {Electronic Visual Acuity - Modified Binary Search}) utilizes a testing strategy that would appear to increase the efficiency and standardization of acuity threshold determination. A more efficient test is justified on the basis of reducing subject burden. Increased measurement efficiency may also reduce both subject- and tester-based bias, while allowing a better means to assess measurement stability through the collection of repeated measures data.
As part of the standard eye examination, replicated visual acuity assessments will be made during regularly-scheduled Clinic visits. Up to 500 opportunistically-sampled subjects from the National Eye Institute will be tested both with the ETDRS and EVA-MOBS protocols over a 12 month study period. Similar testing will take place at two other institutions (Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR; The Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX) and the data from all three institutions will be combined and analyzed at the JAEB Center (Tampa, FL). Subjects will range in age from 7 years to 90 years and will be classified by clinical diagnosis (normal, high refractive error, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia and other criteria). First, those with poor acuity will be oversampled by increasing the chance that they will be selected for this testing. Second, patients will only be selected for this extra testing if it will not seriously delay clinic operations on any given day. Order of acuity test type will be randomized. It is estimated that up to 10 patients per day can have this testing performed without compromising clinic operations.
The experimental protocol runs on a Palm handheld that is used to provide instructions to the tester, record the subject's responses, and communicate with a PC/monitor at a test distance of 3 meters. Stimuli are high contrast black-and-white ETDRS letters presented on an ultra high resolution FD Trinitron monitor, that subtend 2.5 to 200 min of arc; each letter appears in isolation under equiluminant conditions, and is flanked with black bars to simulate visual crowding.
Acuity scores will be compared, with the ETDRS score serving as the reference standard. Stability of the acuity estimates from the EVA-MOBS protocol will be assessed with data from repeated measures. A short questionnaire will be administered, following the last acuity test, to determine whether a test type preference exists.
If results indicate that the protocol is well tolerated by clinical populations and that thresholds are accurate, precise, and stable, the method will be standardized for use in future trials. Use of stimuli to test visual resolution acuity, such as the Landolt-C, may subsequently be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Subjects will be classified into those with or without ocular disease, high refractive error, AMD, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia, or a specified other ocular disease.
Patients with low vision will be oversampled in order to test within a large range of possible end points.
All subjects will have the ability to understand and sign an informed consent form obtained prior to enrollment.
Enrolled participants will range in age from 7 years to 90 years.
Exclusion Criteria
Children younger than 7, due to cognitive inability to undergo specific tests and procedures required in the protocol.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):413-25.
Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):91-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01-EI-0136
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
010136
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.