Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
OBSERVATIONAL
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To determine what changes in the eyes cause certain eyes to progress in nearsightedness more slowly
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Wavelength Intervention for Nearsighted Kids
NCT06598423
Study of Theories About Myopia Progression (STAMP)
NCT00335049
Contact Lenses and Myopia
NCT02180347
Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Myopia Control
NCT05090592
Controlling Myopia Progression With Soft Contact Lenses (Contact Lens Control)
NCT01829191
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An eye care practitioner first reported that hard contact lenses may slow or stop the progression of nearsightedness in 1956. Other anecdotal clinical reports with similar results soon followed. Previous review papers have suggested that rigid contact lenses slow the progression of myopia in children, and several studies have attempted to prove this.
Two studies in the past twenty years have shown that rigid gas permeable contact lenses slow the progression of nearsightedness in children, however both studies failed to provide proper attention to many important variables. While these earlier works produced intriguing results for scientists and clinicians, they contain many problems that challenge the significance of the studies findings. The faults of the previous studies can be summarized in four categories: 1) high losses to follow-up, 2) inadequate control group, 3) incomplete ocular component measurements, and 4) inadequate or poorly selected entry criteria.
Positive results in previous studies also failed to exclude alternate possibilities which may explain why rigid gas permeable contact lenses may slow the progression of myopia. For example, the studies found that rigid contact lenses slow the progression of myopia and that corneal flattening accounts for some of the treatment effect, but none of the studies was able to definitively answer other mechanisms that may slow myopia advancement. A need for a controlled study of rigid contact lenses which measures all of the components that may affect myopia progression still exists. The CLAMP Study examines all of these components and addresses the problems encountered in previous studies.
The CLAMP Study uses a run-in period to enroll only children who are able to adapt to rigid contact lens wear into the study. This decreases the number of children who drop-out of the study because they cannot adapt to rigid contact lens wear. Once children show that they are able to wear rigid contact lenses, they are enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to wear rigid gas permeable contact lenses or soft contact lenses. Both groups are then examined each year for three years to determine which group progresses the most in nearsightedness.
Annual examinations include assessment of the children's ability to focus their eyes, their eye glass prescription, the length of their eyes, detailed maps of the shape and thickness of their corneas (the clear window on the front of the eye), the shape of their eyes, and the curvature of the lens inside the eye. Their eye glass prescription is determined when the children's eyes are dilated. We examined 222 children for eligibility. Out of the 222 children, 148 were eligible to participate in the run-in period. Of the 148 eligible children, 116 (78.5%) were able to adapt to rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. All of the children were examined at The Ohio State University College of Optometry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
8 Years
11 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ohio State University College of Optometry
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, Verkicharla PK, Li D, Mavi S, Kernohan A, Li T, Walline JJ. Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;2(2):CD014758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NEI-81
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.