Efficacy and Safety of MiSight ® Contact Lenses in Reducing the Progression of Childhood Myopia.
NCT ID: NCT01917110
Last Updated: 2020-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
79 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-13
2016-06-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Bausch + Lomb Myopia Control Lens for the Correction of Myopic Ametropia and Slowing the Progression of Myopia in Children
NCT06305663
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses in Slowing Mypoia Progression
NCT01729208
Controlling Myopia Progression With Soft Contact Lenses (Contact Lens Control)
NCT01829191
Management of Myopia in University Students Using Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses
NCT05955638
Eleven Years of Menicon Z Night Contact Lens Wear in Reducing Myopia Progression in Children
NCT04806711
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
omafilcon A
Contact Lens Group
omafilcon A
Spectacle Group
Prescription at Baseline
Spectacle
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
omafilcon A
Spectacle
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Be between 8 and 12 years of age inclusive at the baseline examination.
2. Have:
1. read the Informed Assent,
2. been given an explanation of the Informed Assent,
3. indicated an understanding of the Informed Assent and
4. signed the Informed Assent Form.
3. Have their parent or legal guardian:
1. read the Informed Consent,
2. been given an explanation of the Informed Consent,
3. indicated an understanding of the Informed Consent and
4. signed the Informed Consent Form.
4. Along with their parent or guardian, be capable of comprehending the nature of the study, and be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol.
5. Along with their parent or guardian, agree to maintain the visit schedule and be able to keep all appointments as specified in the study protocol for the duration of the study
6. Agree to accept either the control or test lens as assigned by the randomisation scheme.
7. Agree to wear the assigned contact lenses for the duration of the 2 year study and to inform the study investigator if this schedule is interrupted. (Wearing time may be modified by the study staff for health reasons.)
8. Possess wearable and visually functional eyeglasses.
9. Be in good general health, based on his/her and parent's/guardian's knowledge.
10. Have best-corrected visual acuity by manifest refraction of +0.10 logMAR (20/25 Snellen equivalent) or better in each eye.
11. Meet the following refractive criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction at baseline:
1. Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error (SERE): between -0.75 and -4.00 D inclusive.
2. Astigmatism: \< -0.75 D
3. Anisometropia: \< 1.00D
Exclusion Criteria
1. Subject has previously or recently worn soft or rigid gas permeable contact lenses, including orthokeratology lenses.
2. Subject appears to exhibit poor personal hygiene (that in the investigator's opinion might prevent safe contact lens wear).
3. Subject is currently or prior to this study has been an active participant in another clinical study.
4. Parent / guardian or close relative is a member, of the office staff, including the investigator(s).
5. Current or prior use of bifocals, progressive addition lenses, atropine, pirenzepine or ANY other myopia control treatment.
6. Subject was born earlier than 30 weeks or weighed less than 1500g (3.3lb) at birth.
7. Regular use of ocular medications (prescription or over-the-counter), artificial tears, or wetting agents.
8. Current use of systemic medications which may significantly affect contact lens wear, tear film production, pupil size, accommodation or refractive state. Such as, but not limited to: long term use of nasal decongestants (for example, pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine), antihistamines (for example, chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine), Prednisolone or Ritalin (methylphenidate).
9. A known allergy to fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine or tropicamide.
10. A history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, ocular viral or fungal infections or other recurrent ocular infections.
11. Strabismus by cover test at far (4 m) or near (40 cm) wearing distance correction.
12. Known ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis, episcleritis or scleritis, glaucoma, Sjogren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, or diabetes.
13. Any ocular, systemic or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development. Such as, but not limited to: persistent pupillary membrane, vitreous hemorrhage, cataract, corneal scarring, ptosis eyelid hemangiomas, Marfan's Syndrome, Down's syndrome, Ehler's-Danlos syndrome, Stickler's syndrome, ocular albinism, retinopathy of prematurity.
14. Keratoconus or an irregular cornea.
15. Biomicroscope findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear including, but not limited to:
1. corneal scars within the visual axis
2. neovascularisation or ghost vessels \> 1.5 mm in from the limbus
3. Any active anterior segment ocular disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
4. giant papillary conjunctivitis of Grade 2 or worse
5. allergic or seasonal conjunctivitis (if the study investigator believes it could significantly interfere with maintaining the specified contact lens wearing schedule)
6. clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) abnormalities of the anterior segment, lids, conjunctiva, sclera or associated structures.
16. The investigator for any reason considers that it is not in the best interest of the subject to participate in the study.
8 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CooperVision, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cesar Villa Collar, OD PhD FAAO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Departamento de Optica y Optometria de la Universidad Europea de Madrid
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Departamento de Óptica y Optometría de la Universidad Europea de Madrid
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, Verkicharla PK, Li D, Mavi S, Kernohan A, Li T, Walline JJ. Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;2(2):CD014758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2.
Lopes-Ferreira D, Ruiz-Pomeda A, Perez-Sanchez B, Queiros A, Villa-Collar C. Ocular and corneal aberrations changes in controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight(R) Assessment Study Spain (MASS). BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01865-y.
Ruiz-Pomeda A, Prieto-Garrido FL, Hernandez Verdejo JL, Villa-Collar C. Rebound Effect in the Misight Assessment Study Spain (Mass). Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1223-1226. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1878227. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
Ruiz-Pomeda A, Perez-Sanchez B, Canadas P, Prieto-Garrido FL, Gutierrez-Ortega R, Villa-Collar C. Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight(R) Assessment Study Spain (MASS). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;257(1):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4115-5. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
Ruiz-Pomeda A, Perez-Sanchez B, Valls I, Prieto-Garrido FL, Gutierrez-Ortega R, Villa-Collar C. MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS). A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;256(5):1011-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3906-z. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P2013/05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.