Quality-of-Life Assessment of Patients Who Have Cancer of the Esophagus
NCT ID: NCT00003321
Last Updated: 2013-06-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
370 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
1998-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial studies quality-of-life assessments of patients with cancer of the esophagus who are receiving treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quality of Life Assessment of Patients Receiving Treatment for Esophageal Cancer [Companion to CALGB-9781]
NCT00003381
Prospective Observational Trial to Evaluate Quality of Life After Neoadjuvant or Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT03712774
Quality of Life Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
NCT01558648
Quality Of Life Outcomes Following Treatment for Esophageal Cancer
NCT00598117
RCT on the Combined Modality Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus
NCT00559351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by treatment (potentially curative vs purely palliative). Patients receiving potentially curative treatment are further stratified according to study treatment (esophagectomy alone vs esophagectomy plus adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy vs radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy). Patients receiving purely palliative treatment are further stratified according to study treatment (intubation/laser/ethanol injection vs palliative chemo/radiotherapy without endoscopic relief of dysphagia). Patients are administered two questionnaires: (1) The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) is a 30-item questionnaire about patient ability to function, symptoms related to the cancer and its treatment, overall health and quality of life, and perceived financial impact of the cancer and its treatment. (2) The EORTC QLQ-OES-24 is a 24-item esophageal cancer-specific questionnaire supplementing EORTC QLQ-C30 with information about disease and treatment-related symptoms and side effects, dysphagia, nutrition, and social and emotional effects of esophageal cancer. Both questionnaires are administered once before and once during or after treatment.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 370 patients (170 with locoregional disease, 200 with metastatic disease) will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
psychosocial assessment and care
quality-of-life assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Any age Performance status: Not specified Life expectancy: Group I: At least 3 months Group II: At least 4 weeks Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified Other: Mentally fit to complete a questionnaire or undergo an interview Aware of diagnosis No concurrent second malignancy except basal cell skin cancer No concurrent participation in other quality-of-life studies
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: See Disease Characteristics Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: See Disease Characteristics Surgery: See Disease Characteristics
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jane Blazeby, MB, CHB, FRCS, BSc, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Clinique Armoricaine De Radiologie
Saint Brieux, , France
Centre Alexis Vautrin
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Robert Roessle Klinik
Berlin, , Germany
University of Marburg
Marburg, , Germany
Diakonissehjemm Ets University Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Hospital De Navarra
Pamplona, , Spain
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg (Goteborg), , Sweden
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneva
Geneva, , Switzerland
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Conroy T, Etienne PL, Adenis A, Ducreux M, Paillot B, Oliveira J, Seitz JF, Francois E, Van Cutsem E, Wagener DJ, Kohser F, Daamen S, Praet M, Gorlia T, Baron B, Wils J; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. Vinorelbine and cisplatin in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: response, toxicity, quality of life and survival. Ann Oncol. 2002 May;13(5):721-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf063.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EORTC-15961/40973
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EORTC-15961-40973
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.