Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-01-31
2001-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To determine how surgical removal compared to observation of subfoveal CNV due to AMD, OHS, or idiopathic causes changes the patient's perception of health- and vision-related "quality of life," as measured by telephone interview using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) instrument, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25).
To determine whether randomized trials of surgery are warranted for patients with subfoveal CNV associated with age-related macular degeneration not suitable for laser treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Foveal Cone Outer Segment Tips Line Defect in Macular Pseudohole
NCT01959802
Early Vitrectomy for Macular Tractional Maculopathy
NCT01121978
Early Vitrectomy for Impending Macular Hole
NCT01121965
Comparative Study of Multi-endodiathermy Retinectomy Versus Relaxing Retinectomy for Retinal Re-detachment
NCT02425085
Effects of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy on Macular Hole and Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes
NCT03433547
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, alternative therapies to laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy have been proposed for the management of CNV and are intended to increase the chance of stabilizing or improving vision at a greater rate than with observation. The most promising of these alternatives at this time is surgical removal of the neovascular lesion, i.e., submacular surgery. The rationale for this surgical approach is that removal of the CNV may halt enlargement of the visual defect, spare photoreceptors in the central macula, and allow adjacent ocular structures to function normally. Data regarding the effectiveness of this approach is limited to reports of case series which suffer from the absence of untreated controls, limited number of cases evaluated, or lack of long term follow-up to assess the impact of recurrent CNV, delayed atrophy of the outer retina, and adverse outcomes such as cataract and retinal detachment, requiring additional treatment.
The Submacular Surgery Trials comprise a set of multicenter, randomized clinical trials with the goal of determining whether surgical removal of subfoveal CNV stabilizes or improves vision more often than observation. A total of 19 clinical centers collaborated in conducting a clinical trial for patients with neovascular OHS and idiopathic CNV (Group H protocol). The target sample size for the Group H protocol was 250 participants to be enrolled and followed for 4 years. A total of 29 clinical centers collaborated in conducting two additional clinical trials for patients with neovascular AMD. The target sample size for these AMD trials was 960 participants to be enrolled and followed for 4 years.
Vision data collected at baseline include a protocol refraction, best-corrected logMAR visual acuity (ETDRS charts), contrast threshold (Pelli-Robson charts), and reading speed (enlarged text). Other baseline data recorded include stereoscopic color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiograms, and lens photographs, as well as health- and vision-related quality of life interview data (by telephone).
Eligible patients who gave signed, informed consent were randomly assigned to surgery (within 8 days of randomization) or observation. Patients, assigned to surgery, are seen one month post-surgery for an examination and photographs. All participants are examined at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization to collect vision data (collected in a masked fashion at 24 and 48 months after randomization) and to repeat photography. Quality of life telephone interviews are repeated at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization.
The primary outcome is improvement in visual acuity from baseline to the two-year examination or retention of baseline visual acuity through the two-year examination. Secondary outcomes include change in quality of life from baseline to the 2- and 4-year examinations, change in visual acuity over 4 years, large losses of visual acuity, and adverse ocular outcomes (e.g., those requiring additional treatment such as cataract, retinal detachment, or recurrent CNV).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
TREATMENT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Removal
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grossniklaus HE, Green WR. Histopathologic and ultrastructural findings of surgically excised choroidal neovascularization. Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;116(6):745-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.6.745.
Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Reynolds SM. Patient-reported outcomes among sham vs no-treatment controls from randomized trials. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;129(2):200-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.359.
Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group; Solomon SD, Jefferys JL, Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB. Risk factors for second eye progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration: SST report No. 21 Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Retina. 2009 Sep;29(8):1080-90. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181b1baeb.
Solomon SD, Dong LM, Haller JA, Gilson MM, Hawkins BS, Bressler NM; SST research group and the SST adverse event review committee. Risk factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the submacular surgery trials: SST report No. 22. Retina. 2009 Jun;29(6):819-24. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a0857e.
Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Reynolds SM. Visual acuity outcomes among sham vs no-treatment controls from randomized trials. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;127(6):725-31. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.101.
Bass EB, Gilson MM, Mangione CM, Hawkins BS, Miskala PH, Mann AL, Bressler NM. Surgical removal vs observation for idiopathic or ocular histoplasmosis syndrome-associated subfoveal choroidal neovascularization: Vision Preference Value Scale findings from the randomized SST Group H Trial: SST Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1626-32. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.12.1626.
Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group; Solomon SD, Jefferys JL, Hawkins BS, Bressler NM. Incident choroidal neovascularization in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: SST report No. 20 from the Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;125(10):1323-30. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.10.1323.
Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Evaluation of minimum clinically meaningful changes in scores on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) SST Report Number 19. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):205-15. doi: 10.1080/09286580701502970.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NEI-52
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.