Effects of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Healthy and Chronic Cervical Pain Individuals

NCT ID: NCT07345793

Last Updated: 2026-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-19

Study Completion Date

2026-02-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary:

This project consists of two sequential experimental phases designed to analyze the immediate and 24-hour effects of three invasive physiotherapy techniques -dry needling (DN), percutaneous neuromodulation (PENS), and percutaneous electrolysis (EPE)- on muscle tone and pain perception.

In the first phase, the study will be conducted on healthy volunteers to assess the physiological responses and safety profile of the interventions under controlled conditions. Each participant will receive one of the three randomly assigned interventions (DN, PENS, or EPE), applied to the upper trapezius muscle. Pain perception (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and muscle mechanical properties (tone, stiffness, and elasticity) will be measured before and after the intervention, and after 24 hours, using the MyotonPRO device.

In the second phase, the same protocol and parameters will be applied to patients with chronic neck pain, in order to compare the magnitude and persistence of the effects between healthy subjects and symptomatic individuals.

This study aims to improve understanding of the short-term physiological mechanisms of invasive physiotherapy techniques and their relative effectiveness in managing chronic neck pain. The findings will contribute to the development of more precise and evidence-based treatment protocols for musculoskeletal pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is designed as a two-phase randomized experimental trial with parallel group assignment.

In the first phase, healthy volunteers will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups:

1. Dry Needling (DN) - mechanical stimulation of an active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius.
2. Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PENS) - low-frequency electrical stimulation applied near the accessory nerve through an acupuncture needle.
3. Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPE) - galvanic current (1 mA, three impacts of 5 seconds) applied through a needle at the trigger point.

All participants will undergo a single treatment session. Assessments of pain intensity (VAS) and muscle mechanical properties (tone, stiffness, elasticity measured by MyotonPRO) will be performed before the intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours later.

In the second phase, the same study design, intervention parameters, and outcome measures will be applied to a population of patients with chroni
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dry needling

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dry needling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dry needling will be performed on the upper trapezius muscle at an active myofascial trigger point. A sterile, single-use solid filament needle (0.30 × 40 mm) will be inserted until eliciting three local twitch responses (LTRs). The needle will then be withdrawn immediately after obtaining the final response. The technique aims to normalize motor endplate activity and reduce local and referred pain through mechanical and neurophysiological modulation.

Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous nerve stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous neuromodulation will be applied using a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) inserted near the accessory nerve pathway in the upper trapezius region. A low-frequency alternating current (10 Hz, 250 μs pulse width) will be delivered for 15 minutes using an electrotherapy device approved for clinical use. The objective is to modulate neuromuscular excitability and decrease pain perception through peripheral and central mechanisms.

Percutaneous electrolysis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous electrolysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous electrolysis will be performed by inserting a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) into the active myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius. A galvanic current of 1 mA will be applied for three impacts of 5 seconds each using an approved electrolysis device. This technique produces a controlled local inflammatory response, promoting tissue regeneration and analgesia through electrochemical and neurophysiological effects.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dry needling

Dry needling will be performed on the upper trapezius muscle at an active myofascial trigger point. A sterile, single-use solid filament needle (0.30 × 40 mm) will be inserted until eliciting three local twitch responses (LTRs). The needle will then be withdrawn immediately after obtaining the final response. The technique aims to normalize motor endplate activity and reduce local and referred pain through mechanical and neurophysiological modulation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous nerve stimulation

Percutaneous neuromodulation will be applied using a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) inserted near the accessory nerve pathway in the upper trapezius region. A low-frequency alternating current (10 Hz, 250 μs pulse width) will be delivered for 15 minutes using an electrotherapy device approved for clinical use. The objective is to modulate neuromuscular excitability and decrease pain perception through peripheral and central mechanisms.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous electrolysis

Percutaneous electrolysis will be performed by inserting a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) into the active myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius. A galvanic current of 1 mA will be applied for three impacts of 5 seconds each using an approved electrolysis device. This technique produces a controlled local inflammatory response, promoting tissue regeneration and analgesia through electrochemical and neurophysiological effects.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 65 years.
2. Healthy individuals without any current musculoskeletal or neurological pathology.
3. Presence of a palpable myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle.
4. No neck or shoulder pain requiring medical treatment in the past three months.
5. Willingness to refrain from other physiotherapy or manual therapy interventions during the study period.
6. Ability to understand and provide written informed consent

Phase 2 - Patients with Chronic Neck Pain

1. Age between 18 and 65 years.
2. Diagnosis of chronic mechanical or tension-type neck pain lasting for at least 3 months.
3. Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle.
4. Pain intensity between 3 and 7 on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline.
5. No previous invasive physiotherapy treatments (dry needling, electrolysis, or neuromodulation) within the last 4 weeks.
6. Ability and willingness to attend all study sessions and follow-up assessments.
7. Signed informed consent before participation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of cervical or shoulder surgery.
2. Neurological, systemic, or rheumatologic disorders affecting the cervical or upper limb region.
3. Anticoagulant therapy or known bleeding disorders.
4. Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.
5. Skin infection, wound, or dermatological condition at or near the intervention site.
6. Use of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or muscle relaxant medications within 48 hours prior to the intervention.
7. Prior invasive physiotherapy (dry needling, PENS, or EPE) in the target area during the past month.
8. Contraindications to electrical stimulation (for PENS or EPE groups), such as implanted pacemaker or metal implants near the treatment area.
9. Fear of needles (trypanophobia) or intolerance to invasive procedures.
10. Participation in another clinical trial within the past 3 months.
11. Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Europea de Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlos Romero Morales

Physiotherapist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carlos Romero-Morales, PhD, Full Professor

Role: CONTACT

+34696849824

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C., Dommerholt J. Myofascial Trigger Points: Pathophysiology and Evidence-Informed Diagnosis and Management. Pain Medicine. 2018.

Reference Type RESULT

Abat F. et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous electrolysis for tendinopathies. Br J Sports Med. 2015.

Reference Type RESULT

Rodríguez-Sanz J. et al. Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2014.

Reference Type RESULT

Pirri C, Manocchio N, Sorbino A, Pirri N, Foti C. Percutaneous Electrolysis for Musculoskeletal Disorders Management in Rehabilitation Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1793. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151793.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 40805826 (View on PubMed)

Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24482302 (View on PubMed)

Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):834-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. Epub 2005 Jul 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15999284 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25/787-EC_X

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.