Effects of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Healthy and Chronic Cervical Pain Individuals
NCT ID: NCT07345793
Last Updated: 2026-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
EARLY_PHASE1
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-19
2026-02-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project consists of two sequential experimental phases designed to analyze the immediate and 24-hour effects of three invasive physiotherapy techniques -dry needling (DN), percutaneous neuromodulation (PENS), and percutaneous electrolysis (EPE)- on muscle tone and pain perception.
In the first phase, the study will be conducted on healthy volunteers to assess the physiological responses and safety profile of the interventions under controlled conditions. Each participant will receive one of the three randomly assigned interventions (DN, PENS, or EPE), applied to the upper trapezius muscle. Pain perception (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and muscle mechanical properties (tone, stiffness, and elasticity) will be measured before and after the intervention, and after 24 hours, using the MyotonPRO device.
In the second phase, the same protocol and parameters will be applied to patients with chronic neck pain, in order to compare the magnitude and persistence of the effects between healthy subjects and symptomatic individuals.
This study aims to improve understanding of the short-term physiological mechanisms of invasive physiotherapy techniques and their relative effectiveness in managing chronic neck pain. The findings will contribute to the development of more precise and evidence-based treatment protocols for musculoskeletal pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Chronic Neck Pain.
NCT03844802
Dry Needling, Manual Therapy and Exercise for Neck Pain Management
NCT05607459
Electrical Dry Needling and Therapeutic Exercise Versus Therapeutic Exercise in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
NCT06522893
Patient Expectations and Dry Needling
NCT04417491
Dry Needling and Electromyographic Changes in Neck Pain
NCT03787706
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
In the first phase, healthy volunteers will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups:
1. Dry Needling (DN) - mechanical stimulation of an active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius.
2. Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PENS) - low-frequency electrical stimulation applied near the accessory nerve through an acupuncture needle.
3. Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPE) - galvanic current (1 mA, three impacts of 5 seconds) applied through a needle at the trigger point.
All participants will undergo a single treatment session. Assessments of pain intensity (VAS) and muscle mechanical properties (tone, stiffness, elasticity measured by MyotonPRO) will be performed before the intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours later.
In the second phase, the same study design, intervention parameters, and outcome measures will be applied to a population of patients with chroni
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dry needling
Dry needling
Dry needling will be performed on the upper trapezius muscle at an active myofascial trigger point. A sterile, single-use solid filament needle (0.30 × 40 mm) will be inserted until eliciting three local twitch responses (LTRs). The needle will then be withdrawn immediately after obtaining the final response. The technique aims to normalize motor endplate activity and reduce local and referred pain through mechanical and neurophysiological modulation.
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Percutaneous nerve stimulation
Percutaneous neuromodulation will be applied using a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) inserted near the accessory nerve pathway in the upper trapezius region. A low-frequency alternating current (10 Hz, 250 μs pulse width) will be delivered for 15 minutes using an electrotherapy device approved for clinical use. The objective is to modulate neuromuscular excitability and decrease pain perception through peripheral and central mechanisms.
Percutaneous electrolysis
Percutaneous electrolysis
Percutaneous electrolysis will be performed by inserting a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) into the active myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius. A galvanic current of 1 mA will be applied for three impacts of 5 seconds each using an approved electrolysis device. This technique produces a controlled local inflammatory response, promoting tissue regeneration and analgesia through electrochemical and neurophysiological effects.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dry needling
Dry needling will be performed on the upper trapezius muscle at an active myofascial trigger point. A sterile, single-use solid filament needle (0.30 × 40 mm) will be inserted until eliciting three local twitch responses (LTRs). The needle will then be withdrawn immediately after obtaining the final response. The technique aims to normalize motor endplate activity and reduce local and referred pain through mechanical and neurophysiological modulation.
Percutaneous nerve stimulation
Percutaneous neuromodulation will be applied using a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) inserted near the accessory nerve pathway in the upper trapezius region. A low-frequency alternating current (10 Hz, 250 μs pulse width) will be delivered for 15 minutes using an electrotherapy device approved for clinical use. The objective is to modulate neuromuscular excitability and decrease pain perception through peripheral and central mechanisms.
Percutaneous electrolysis
Percutaneous electrolysis will be performed by inserting a sterile acupuncture needle (0.30 × 40 mm) into the active myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius. A galvanic current of 1 mA will be applied for three impacts of 5 seconds each using an approved electrolysis device. This technique produces a controlled local inflammatory response, promoting tissue regeneration and analgesia through electrochemical and neurophysiological effects.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Healthy individuals without any current musculoskeletal or neurological pathology.
3. Presence of a palpable myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle.
4. No neck or shoulder pain requiring medical treatment in the past three months.
5. Willingness to refrain from other physiotherapy or manual therapy interventions during the study period.
6. Ability to understand and provide written informed consent
Phase 2 - Patients with Chronic Neck Pain
1. Age between 18 and 65 years.
2. Diagnosis of chronic mechanical or tension-type neck pain lasting for at least 3 months.
3. Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle.
4. Pain intensity between 3 and 7 on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline.
5. No previous invasive physiotherapy treatments (dry needling, electrolysis, or neuromodulation) within the last 4 weeks.
6. Ability and willingness to attend all study sessions and follow-up assessments.
7. Signed informed consent before participation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Neurological, systemic, or rheumatologic disorders affecting the cervical or upper limb region.
3. Anticoagulant therapy or known bleeding disorders.
4. Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.
5. Skin infection, wound, or dermatological condition at or near the intervention site.
6. Use of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or muscle relaxant medications within 48 hours prior to the intervention.
7. Prior invasive physiotherapy (dry needling, PENS, or EPE) in the target area during the past month.
8. Contraindications to electrical stimulation (for PENS or EPE groups), such as implanted pacemaker or metal implants near the treatment area.
9. Fear of needles (trypanophobia) or intolerance to invasive procedures.
10. Participation in another clinical trial within the past 3 months.
11. Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Europea de Madrid
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carlos Romero Morales
Physiotherapist
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C., Dommerholt J. Myofascial Trigger Points: Pathophysiology and Evidence-Informed Diagnosis and Management. Pain Medicine. 2018.
Abat F. et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous electrolysis for tendinopathies. Br J Sports Med. 2015.
Rodríguez-Sanz J. et al. Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2014.
Pirri C, Manocchio N, Sorbino A, Pirri N, Foti C. Percutaneous Electrolysis for Musculoskeletal Disorders Management in Rehabilitation Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1793. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151793.
Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):834-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25/787-EC_X
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.