Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Treadmill in Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT07342660
Last Updated: 2026-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of combining bilateral anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the sensorimotor cortices with treadmill training in children with CP.
Methods: A within-subjects case series was conducted with five children with CP. Participants received ten sessions of treadmill training (at 50% of their maximum over-ground speed) concurrently with bilateral anodal tDCS. Outcomes, assessed pre- and post-intervention, included postural alignment (medio-lateral and anterior-posterior), ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, gait variability, walking tolerance (6-minute walk test), motor function (GMFM-66), and hip/knee range of motion. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and effect sizes (Hedges' g).
Anticipated Impact: This study will pioneer a novel bilateral tDCS montage for CP rehabilitation. The findings are expected to provide critical insights into the synergistic relationship between neuromodulation and physical training, ultimately informing more effective, evidence-based interventions to enhance motor function and participation in this population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Reality Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Cerebral Palsy.
NCT04044677
Single-session tDCS in Cerebral Palsy
NCT03635775
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Motor Learning in Children With Cerebral Palsy (CP)
NCT01852474
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Risk of Falling in Cerebral Palsy Spastic Hemiplegic Children
NCT06730763
Enhancing Motor Learning in Children With Cerebral Palsy Using Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation
NCT04725019
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The optimal protocol for administering tDCS to pediatric cerebral palsy patients has yet to be established. Contrary to earlier studies that utilized unilateral anodal stimulation targeting the contralateral motor cortex, a hypothesis suggests that bilateral stimulation of both hemispheres could yield superior outcomes. This premise is supported by magnetoencephalography (MEG) a widespread disruption in neural excitability within both sensory-motor cortices of children with CP. This bilateral impairment occurs even in cases of unilateral lesions and contributes to reduced activation in corticospinal pathways. Accordingly, subsequent research applying unilateral anodal tDCS to the ipsilateral motor cortex (non-lesioned hemisphere) demonstrated enhancements in motor functions such as reaching skills and movement duration.
As a feasibility study, this pilot research assessed the practicality and initial effects of administering bilateral anodal tDCS concurrently with treadmill training to enhance gait parameters, range of motion, and reduce spasticity in pediatric patients with diplegic CP.
Methods Study design \& participants This clinical study was approved by the IRB committee of Jordan University of Science and Technology and the King Abdullah University Hospital (#2019/420) based on the Declaration of Helsinki. Five children (aged 4-12 years) with spastic diplegic CP were enrolled. Inclusion criteria stipulated a Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level of I-III, the ability to walk independently for at least 10 meters, and an IQ greater than 70. Key exclusion criteria included a history of orthopedic surgery, neurolytic blocks, or Botox injections in the past six months, as well as the presence of concurrent orthopedic impairments, epilepsy, intracranial metal implants, or hearing aids. In addition, voluntary written informed consent was obtained from all participant children by their legal guardians before participation in the study.
Treadmill training \& tDCS intervention While prior research utilizing unilateral anodal tDCS in children with CP positioned a single anode over the C3 or C4 motor cortex and a cathode on the supra-orbital area according to the 10-20 EEG system, the present study employed a bilateral montage. Using the 10-10 EEG system for more precise placement, two anodes were positioned over the left FC1 and right FC2 regions (encompassing motor and frontal areas), with two corresponding cathodes located over the bilateral supra-orbital areas. A low current intensity of 1mA was applied.
The therapeutic protocol commenced with two treadmill familiarization sessions. This was followed by ten combined treatment sessions, each consisting of a 12-minute interval: a 1-minute warm-up, a 10-minute simultaneous treadmill training and tDCS therapy period, and a 1-minute cool-down. Treadmill speed was initiated at 50% of the child's maximum ground speed from the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and was progressively increased based on individual tolerance. Tolerance was gauged by the absence of fatigue complaints, a heart rate not exceeding 70% of maximum, and the maintenance of proper gait without shuffling. Assistants were present to provide support and verbal feedback to promote correct movement patterns.
Outcome Measures
Outcome Measures Pre- and post-intervention data were collected, including:
1. Postural alignment (medio-lateral displacement)
2. Postural alignment (anterior-posterior displacement)
3. Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (degrees)
4. Hip range of motion (degrees)
5. Knee range of motion (degrees)
6. Walking endurance assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (distance in meters)
7. Gross motor function assessed using the GMFM-66 (total score)
8. Gait speed (meters/second)
9. Gait variability (dimensionless autocorrelation coefficient)
Data analysis Due to the cautions reported in the previous study of using the paired t-test with extremely small sample sizes (n = 5), the mean ± standard deviation was calculated for all outcome measures, the intervention's clinical effect size was determined using Hedges' g, with values indicating small, moderate, or large effects, and gait outcomes were measured by having each child walk a 10 m track twice before and after the intervention. Data is available.
3\. Result and Discussion This study protocol is innovative in term of the tDCS stimulation protocol (bilateral anodal tDCS vs. unilateral anodal tDCS), and its outcome measures that include evaluation of the brain activity and plasticity, quantitative gait outcome measures (kinematics and kinetics), motor development, quality of life, and level of enjoyment and participation, which were not examined in one full set previously.
In addition, bilateral anodal tDCS would be feasible, and safe rehabilitation tools that would modulate the brain activity and improve the gait function, balance functions, endurance, quality of life, and level of participation and enjoyment of children with CP. Therefore, exploring such short and long-term therapeutic effects of the bilateral anodal tDCS on the children's body functions, activity and participation outcome measures provide us a promising non-invasive tool in CP rehabilitation that would be combined with many other rehabilitation tools and approaches such as behavioral therapy, virtual reality, thera suit, and many other that all used as CP rehabilitation and others neurological condition. In addition, exploring the relationship between brain activity modulation, gait functions changes, and motor development and level of participation and enjoyment would provide a better understanding of this interconnected matrix that we have to consider in our future rehabilitation approaches and strategies of children with CP, and thus serve as an important aspect that will contribute to evidence-based practice in pediatric rehabilitation Besides, it would provide us a better understanding of the mechanism behind the tDCS effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
tDCS & Treadmill
The therapeutic protocol commenced with two treadmill familiarization sessions. This was followed by ten combined treatment sessions.
transcranial direct current stimulation
The therapeutic protocol commenced with two treadmill familiarization sessions. This was followed by ten combined treatment sessions, each consisting of a 12-minute interval: a 1-minute warm-up, a 10-minute simultaneous treadmill training and tDCS therapy period, and a 1-minute cool-down. Treadmill speed was initiated at 50% of the child's maximum ground speed from the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and was progressively increased based on individual tolerance.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transcranial direct current stimulation
The therapeutic protocol commenced with two treadmill familiarization sessions. This was followed by ten combined treatment sessions, each consisting of a 12-minute interval: a 1-minute warm-up, a 10-minute simultaneous treadmill training and tDCS therapy period, and a 1-minute cool-down. Treadmill speed was initiated at 50% of the child's maximum ground speed from the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and was progressively increased based on individual tolerance.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ability to walk independently for at least 10 meters
* IQ greater than 70
Exclusion Criteria
* history of neurolytic blocks,
* history of Botox injections in the past six months
* Presence of concurrent orthopedic impairments
* Presence of epilepsy
* Presence of intracranial metal implants
4 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jordan University of Science and Technology
OTHER
University of Sharjah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hikmat Hadoush
Dr. / Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hikmat Hadoush
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sharjah
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Sharjah
Sharjah city, Emirate of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4322019
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
4202019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.