Danish Access to Support and Help (DASH): Increasing Access to an Evidence-based Intervention for Children With ADHD and Their Parents
NCT ID: NCT07339696
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-15
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Controlled Study of Parent Training in the Treatment of ADHD in Young Children
NCT01684644
The Effects of Peer Co-led Educational Group Intervention for Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
NCT03547843
Social Skills Training and Standard Treatment Versus Standard Treatment of Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
NCT00937469
A School-Based Intervention to Improve Social Functioning
NCT03313349
Children With ADHD and ADHD-like Symptoms and Target Shooting Sport in Danish Shooting Associations.
NCT02898532
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Purpose and Rationale The primary aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a community implementation model for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP-CIM). The project is designed as a Hybrid Type II feasibility study, focusing on both implementation processes and perceived effects in real-world community contexts. The study seeks to determine whether the NFPP-CIM can support feasible, acceptable, and sustainable delivery of NFPP by local practitioners, thereby informing future large-scale implementation.
Objectives
The study objectives are guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and include:
To develop an NFPP Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM) tailored to Danish municipal contexts.
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the NFPP-CIM among families of children with ADHD or difficulties related to attention and activity regulation, as well as among community-level stakeholders (e.g. practitioners and managers).
To explore perceived changes in family functioning and everyday life associated with participation in NFPP-CIM, and to consider how these experiences align with findings previously reported in specialist settings.
Study Design and Setting The study will employ a pre-post hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. NFPP-CIM will be delivered in three Danish municipalities by trained community practitioners in collaboration with local child and family services. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to examine implementation outcomes and user experiences. The project emphasizes co-creation, user participation, and interagency collaboration to strengthen local ownership and sustainability.
Implementation Outcomes Consistent with the study's implementation focus, feasibility and acceptability constitute central outcomes of the project.
Feasibility of implementing the NFPP-CIM will be assessed using quantitative implementation indicators, including:
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of eligible families who consent to participate (assessed from initial contact to enrollment).
Completion rate, defined as the proportion of enrolled families who complete the intervention and post-intervention assessment.
Practitioner adherence, defined as fidelity to the NFPP-CIM manual, assessed through session checklists completed throughout the intervention period (approximately 16 weeks).
Acceptability of the NFPP-CIM will be examined using qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews and brief open-ended satisfaction questionnaires completed by parents. These data will explore the perceived practicality, usefulness, and overall experience of participating in the intervention. Acceptability data will be collected at post-intervention, within six weeks after completion of the programme.
Expected Outcomes and Significance Findings will provide insight into how NFPP can be effectively implemented and scaled up in community settings. Specifically, the study will inform refinement of NFPP training models for local practitioners, strategies for user involvement, and approaches to sustaining cross-sector collaboration. By focusing on real-world feasibility and stakeholder experiences, the study aims to bridge the gap between evidence-based ADHD interventions and community-based practice and to support improved access to high-quality services for families.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NFPP-CIM Implementation Group
The group includes families with children aged 3-12 years with ADHD or attention and activity difficulties, as well as community practitioners, managers, and other local stakeholders involved in delivering the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM). The study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived outcomes of implementing NFPP-CIM in municipal child and family services.
New Forest Parenting Programme
Parent training for children who has difficulties with attention and activity or ADHD
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
New Forest Parenting Programme
Parent training for children who has difficulties with attention and activity or ADHD
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Child aged 3-12 years
* Parent-perceived difficulties with attention and activity regulation, including those with a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of ADHD.
* All custodial parents willing and able to provide informed consent
* Parents interested in participating in the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM)
Exclusion Criteria
* Parents unable to provide informed consent
* Families unable to participate in the intervention due to severe child or family circumstances that preclude engagement (e.g. acute crisis requiring alternative services, Parents or children with severe mental or physical illness that would prevent active participation in the intervention)
3 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
OTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne-Mette Lange
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aarhus University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Forskningsafdelingen - Børne- og Ungdomspsykiatrisk Afdeling, Psykiatrien-Skejby
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alexandre, J.L., et al., The ADHD rating scale-IV preschool version: Factor structure, reliability, validity, and standardisation in a Danish community sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2018. 78: p. 125-135. Arnfred, J., et al., Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Danish medical journal, 2019. 66(6). Borrelli, B., The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. 2011. p. S52-S63. Bowen, D.J., et al., How we design feasibility studies. American journal of preventive medicine, 2009. 36(5): p. 452-457. Cohen, A.N., et al., Improving care quality through hybrid implementation/effectiveness studies: Best practices in design, methods, and measures. Implementation Science, 2015. 10(1): p. A29. Curran, G.M., et al., Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical care, 2012. 50(3): p. 217. Damschroder, L.J., et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 2009. 4(1): p. DuPaul, G.J., et al., Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperFactor structure and normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1998. 20(1): p. 83-102. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional children, 2013. 79(2): p. 213. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 2013. Goodman, R., et al., Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000. 177(6): p. 534.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
152531
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
152531
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.