Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients With Graves Disease
NCT ID: NCT07332988
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-01
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Photobiomodulation in Combination With Topical Cyclosporine A or Tacrolimus
NCT07239128
Comparing Tear Proteomics Profile in Dry Eye Disease pre-and Post-treatment With Low Level Light Therapy
NCT07329712
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed-Dose Combination for Dry Eye Disease
NCT07128628
Evaluation of Low-Level Light Therapy on Meibomian Glands Study
NCT05859295
Use of Azithromycin as Immunomodulatory Therapy in Grave&Apos;s Orbitopathy
NCT01379196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Dry eye disease is a multifactorial disorder characterized by tear film instability and ocular surface inflammation. Patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy often experience a severe form of dry eye that is resistant to conventional topical treatments, resulting in a need of finding new therapies to stabilize the tear-film.
LLLT is a non-invasive photobiomodulation technique that delivers low-intensity, polychromatic red and near-infrared light to target mitochondrial cytochromes and promote cellular activity. Its application in ophthalmology has shown potential to improve meibomian gland function, enhance tear film stability, and downregulate inflammatory cytokines on the ocular surface. However, its utility in patient with diagnosed DED associated with Graves Ophthalmopathy has not been formally evaluated.
Eligible participants included consecutive adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with DED associated with Graves Ophthalmopathy that are refractory to conventional dry eye treatments. Key exclusion criteria were pregnant or breastfeeding patients, uncontrolled systemic disease (other than Graves Disease), use of general corticosteroids in the last 6 months, ocular and orbital surgery in the last 6 months, use of contact lenses in the last month and any active ocular infection or allergy.
Eligible participants were randomly assigned to each the active low-level light treatment group or the sham-control group with the Eye-light unit (Espansione Group Ltd, Funo, Italy). Randomization was performed using a computerized allocation sequence (http://www.sealedenvelope.com). Allocation concealment was ensured through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Both participants and investigators responsible for clinical evaluations remained unaware of group assignment throughout the study period.
Participants were randomized into two groups: the intervention group received LLLT using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), and the control group received sham treatment with an identical, inactive device. Each treatment session lasted a total of 15 minutes. The LLLT masks consisted of light emitting diodes (LEDs) with red light, 633 nm wavelengths. Participants attended a total of seven visits. The first 4 visits comprised of treatment sessions, each session separated by 1 week. The next 3 visits comprised of a follow-up assessment, 1 month following the final treatment session, 60±7 days after the last treatment and 90±7 days after the last treatment, targeting the periocular region and meibomian glands.
Clinical assessments were performed at baseline (T0), before first mask session, 7 days after T0 (T1), 7 days after T1 (T2), 7 days after T2 (T3), 30±4 days after T3 (T4), 60±7 days after T4 (T5) and 90±7 days after T5 (T6), and included:
1. Tear Collection Procedure: Tear samples were collected using Schirmer type I strips without topical anesthesia to assess changes in tear inflammatory biomarkers using Luminex Human Discovery Assay 9 plex- CD 27, CD 40, ICAM 1, IL 1 beta, IL 10 , MMP8, TNF alfa, TNF RI, TRAIL R2 in patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy . The strips were placed in the lower conjunctival fornix for up to 5 minutes, then individually stored in sterile microtubes at -80 °C.
2. Tear Protein Extraction: For protein extraction, the strips were thawed and incubated in 400 μL of 1.5 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.8) containing protease inhibitors for 3 hours, followed by centrifugation at 16,000× g for 15 minutes (4 °C). Total protein content was determined by Nanodrop (ThermoFischer Scientific), and tear cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay (R\&D Systems) on a Luminex FlexMap3D platform.
3. Analysis Method: Tear proteins will be analyzed using the Luminex® multiplex immunoassay, as recommended by the manufacturer.
4. Clinical Measurements: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, Schirmer 1 test, number of total blinks in 30s and number of partial blinks within that timeframe, tear meniscus height, subjective lipid layer pattern grading, automated bulbar conjunctival and limbal hyperemia (DEA 520), fluorescein corneal staining and fluorescein staining using the Oxford scale, tear osmolarity and meibography drop-out graded with the meiboscale for upper and lower eyelids, will be measured at each session (T0-T6).
The primary outcome was the change in tear film stability (NIBUT and FBUT) from baseline to 3 months post treatment. Secondary outcomes included all objective ocular surface parameters. Safety was evaluated by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events and assessing patient tolerability of the device.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 30.0.0.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For normally distributed variables, repeated measures ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-hoc tests were used. For non-normally distributed data, the Friedman test with Dunn's correction was applied. A p-value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This is the first prospective study to investigate LLLT in the diagnosed DED associated with Graves Ophthalmopathy patients. The findings aim to provide evidence for integrating non-pharmacological interventions in ocular surface optimization for this category of patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LLLT Group
A total of 20 patients will be enrolled and treated as per the classical protocol for dry eye treatment (4 sessions at weekly intervals and 3 monthly follow ups).The treatment was delivered through a wearable mask emitting polychromatic red and near-infrared light, targeting the eyelids and meibomian glands.
Ocular surface assessments were performed at baseline (before the first treatment), once a week (before each treatment) for 4 weeks, and later on at one month, 2 months and 3 months follow ups to evaluate the effects of LLLT on tear film quality, inflammation, and meibomian gland function.
Low Light Level therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), which delivers low-level polychromatic red and near-infrared light through a specially designed mask. The LLLT mask consisted of light emitting diodes (LEDs) with red light, 633 nm wavelengths. The treatment is designed to improve tear film stability, stimulate meibomian gland activity, reduce ocular surface inflammation. This protocol targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. Each treatment session lasted a total of 15 minutes. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Sham Group
A total of 10 patients will be enrolled and treated as per the classical protocol for dry eye treatment (4 sessions at weekly intervals and 3 monthly follow ups). The procedure mimicked the experience of the active LLLT intervention, using the same mask device without activation of the therapeutic light emission. The ocular surface assessments were conducted at the same time points as the active treatment group-baseline, every week for the first month, at 1 month, 2 months and 3 months follow ups to evaluate tear film function, ocular surface condition, and meibomian gland performance.
Sham (No Treatment)
The sham group had undergone a similar procedure using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), as the one described above but in this case the device emits only 30% of the treatment power. Patients had a similar visual and sensory experience of the treatment but without actual biologic effects.
Each treatment session lasted a total of 15 minutes. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort. This approach allowed for masking of participants and investigators to minimise bias, while ensuring that patients in the control group received no active therapeutic exposure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham (No Treatment)
The sham group had undergone a similar procedure using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), as the one described above but in this case the device emits only 30% of the treatment power. Patients had a similar visual and sensory experience of the treatment but without actual biologic effects.
Each treatment session lasted a total of 15 minutes. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort. This approach allowed for masking of participants and investigators to minimise bias, while ensuring that patients in the control group received no active therapeutic exposure.
Low Light Level therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), which delivers low-level polychromatic red and near-infrared light through a specially designed mask. The LLLT mask consisted of light emitting diodes (LEDs) with red light, 633 nm wavelengths. The treatment is designed to improve tear film stability, stimulate meibomian gland activity, reduce ocular surface inflammation. This protocol targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. Each treatment session lasted a total of 15 minutes. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Refractory to conventional dry eye treatments (e.g., artificial tears, cyclosporine, corticosteroid eye drops).
* Adult patients (over 18 years old).
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncontrolled systemic diseases (other than Graves' disease).
* Use of general corticosteroids in the last 6 months.
* Ocular or orbital surgery in the last 6 months.
* Use of contact lenses within the last week.
* Active ocular infection or allergy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timofte Zorila Mihaela Madalina
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mihaela Madalina Timofte Zorila
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Medicine "Gr. T. Popa", Iasi, Romania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa"
Iași, Iaşi, Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
598/20.05.2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.