Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mobilization in Patients With Sacral Torsion

NCT ID: NCT07329426

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-15

Study Completion Date

2026-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Project Summary Low Back Pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions worldwide. More than 70% of the people experience low back pain at some time in their life. The sacroiliac joint has been found to be the source of pain in 30% of mechanical low back pain sufferers. Sacral torsion is one of the types of SIJ dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial, conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital and Foundation University College of Physical Therapy will assess the effects of combining muscle energy technique with mobilization on pain, lumbar range of motion, disability and active straight leg raise. Participants will be randomly assigned to either mobilization alone or mobilization with muscle energy technique, performed three times per week for two weeks. Data will be collected at baseline and at end of study (week 2) using the Numeric pain rating scale, goniometer, inclinometer and oswestry disability index. This study addresses a research gap by exploring combined effects of muscle energy technique (PFS) and Maitland mobilization for sacral torsion in improving pain, lumbar mobility, disability and active straight leg raise.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions globally, with over 70% of individuals experiencing it at some point in their lifetime. It is the leading cause of disability worldwide and remains the primary global contributor to years lived with disability. A significant source of mechanical low back pain is the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which accounts for 15% to 30% of cases, making it a key area of interest in both diagnosis and treatment.

SIJ dysfunction typically presents with localized pain and stiffness and can be difficult to differentiate from other causes of LBP such as lumbar spine or hip pathology. The dysfunction usually results from abnormal joint motion or malalignment, often linked to repetitive stress or minor subluxation that damages the joint capsule or posterior ligamentous structures. SIJ dysfunction can be categorized into five main types: anterior rotation, posterior rotation, up slip, down slip, and sacral torsions.

Sacral torsions are a specific type of SIJ dysfunction involving asymmetrical movement of the sacrum along a physiologic oblique axis, leading to joint fixation. These torsions are commonly described in osteopathic literature and include four types: Left-on-Left, Right-on-Right (forward torsions), and Right-on-Left, Left-on-Right (backward torsions). Such dysfunctions are frequently associated with asymmetries in lumbo-pelvic rhythm, leg length discrepancies, scoliosis, and muscular imbalances, particularly involving the hamstrings, piriformis, and quadratus lumborum. These biomechanical and muscular irregularities contribute to pelvic asymmetry during functional movements like forward flexion.

Muscle imbalances play a crucial role in the development and persistence of SIJ dysfunction. These may arise from adaptive responses or underlying biomechanical issues, leading to altered motor control and impaired movement quality. Balance in muscle strength and length, especially between corresponding groups on the left and right sides, is essential for maintaining proper pelvic alignment. Studies such as Jacobs et al. (2005) have shown significant asymmetries in hip abductor strength, highlighting the importance of bilateral symmetry in functional movement.

Conservative management of chronic SIJ dysfunction commonly includes physical therapy, manual therapy, activity modification, and pharmacological interventions such as analgesics and anti-inflammatory medications. Among manual therapy techniques, Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is widely used to address muscle imbalances by utilizing voluntary isometric contractions to engage autogenic or reciprocal inhibition mechanisms. This process activates the Golgi tendon organs, reducing muscle tension and facilitating improved joint mobility. A variation of MET, known as Post-Facilitation Stretch (PFS), involves a maximal isometric contraction followed by a rapid stretch, and has been shown to effectively increase flexibility and range of motion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sacral Torsion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Maitland Mobilization With Muscle Energy Technique (PFS)

Participants in this group will receive Maitland mobilization technique, two sets of 60 oscillations for 30 seconds, directed at sacrum according to standard graded oscillatory movements, grade 1 or 2 in week 1 and grade 3 or 4 in week 2. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) will also be applied to this group targeting specific muscles contributing to sacral torsion (e.g., piriformis, hamstrings, quadratus lumborum), with the purpose of correcting asymmetry, improving joint alignment, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of mobilization. The contract time will be 6-10 seconds and Hold time will be 15 seconds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle Energy Technique + Maitland Mobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Group A will receive Muscle energy technique with Maitland mobilization. Treatment protocol given to both groups will be carried out for 3 sessions per week for 2 weeks.

Post Facilitation Muscle Energy Technique. WEEK 1:

* Hot pack (10 minutes)
* Post-Facilitation MET for piriformis, Quadratus Lumborum and Hamstrings.

WEEK 2:

* Hot pack (10 minutes)
* Post-Facilitation MET for piriformis, Quadratus Lumborum and Hamstrings.

Maitland Mobilization

Participants in this group will receive Maitland mobilization technique, two sets of 60 oscillations for 30 seconds, directed at the sacrum. Mobilization will be applied according to the standard graded oscillatory movements grade 1 or 2 in week 1 and grade 3 or 4 in week 2, aiming to restore joint mobility, reduce pain, and improve function. No additional interventions will be provided.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maitland Mobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Group B will not receive any form of Muscle Energy Technique (MET). Instead, the intervention will consist exclusively of a joint mobilization technique directed at Sacrum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle Energy Technique + Maitland Mobilization

Group A will receive Muscle energy technique with Maitland mobilization. Treatment protocol given to both groups will be carried out for 3 sessions per week for 2 weeks.

Post Facilitation Muscle Energy Technique. WEEK 1:

* Hot pack (10 minutes)
* Post-Facilitation MET for piriformis, Quadratus Lumborum and Hamstrings.

WEEK 2:

* Hot pack (10 minutes)
* Post-Facilitation MET for piriformis, Quadratus Lumborum and Hamstrings.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Maitland Mobilization

Group B will not receive any form of Muscle Energy Technique (MET). Instead, the intervention will consist exclusively of a joint mobilization technique directed at Sacrum.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 22- 44 years (18)
* Both males and females
* Clinically diagnosed sacral torsion. (Annexure E)
* Patients with pain intensity of at least 5 on NPRS
* Positive standing flexion test
* Positive seated flexion test
* Positive Gillet test
* Uneven anatomical landmarks (Sacral Sulcus, Inferior Lateral Angle, Lumbar Lordosis, Lumbar scoliosis, L5 position)

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Neurological deficits (hemiparesis, paralysis) 2. Pregnancy 3. Spinal surgery of any kind 4. Antero-Retro Spondylolisthesis diagnosed through radiological findings 5. Degenerative disc disease diagnosed through radiological findings 6. Spinal stenosis 7. Infection, tumors, osteoporosis, spinal fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation University Islamabad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foundation University Islamabad

Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hafiza Noor ul Huda, DPT

Role: CONTACT

03245475950

Ruqia Begum, MS-OMPT

Role: CONTACT

03115532544

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hafiza Noor ul Huda, DPT

Role: primary

03245475950

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUI/CTR/2025/24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.