Comparative Effects of Neural Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique in Sciatic Patients

NCT ID: NCT04875741

Last Updated: 2021-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, investigator will see the effects of neural mobilization in comparison to the muscle energy technique in the patients suffering from sciatica. Impact of the these two interventional techniques , there out come measures i.e pain, range of motion and functional disability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is aimed in comparison among two interventional techniques i.e neural mobilization and muscle energy technique patients with sciatica. This study will be a randomized controlled trial with double blinded protocol, patients will be randomly allocated in to the two groups. one is the neural mobilization technique group and other is the muscle energy technique group. both of the groups have the conventional physical therapy in addition to these two interventions. data will be collect from the patients.30 minutes session twice a week will be given to the patients in each group. assessment will be done by using visual analog scale, Goniometer, Modified Oswestry Disability Index. Data will be entered and analyzed by using SPSS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Sciatica Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The study would be double-blind as the identity of the patient's group will not be revealed to the assessor and the patient will also be un-aware of the group to which they will be allocated.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neural mobilization

Patient in this study group will get 30 minutes session, twice weekly for 6 weeks. Neural mobilization technique will be applied to the subjects in addition to conventional treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neural mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Mobilization of the structures within and around the nervous system is broadly known as Neural Mobilization.

Muscle energy technique

Patient in this study group will get 30 minutes session, twice weekly for 6 weeks. Muscle energy technique will be applied to the subjects in addition to conventional treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle energy technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Manual therapy technique initially developed and used by the osteopaths is known as Muscle energy techniques(MET).This technique is effective for the pain reduction, lengthening of the shortened muscle and fascia, improvement in blood circulation and promoting lymph drainage.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neural mobilization

Mobilization of the structures within and around the nervous system is broadly known as Neural Mobilization.

Intervention Type OTHER

Muscle energy technique

Manual therapy technique initially developed and used by the osteopaths is known as Muscle energy techniques(MET).This technique is effective for the pain reduction, lengthening of the shortened muscle and fascia, improvement in blood circulation and promoting lymph drainage.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rehabilitation following Neural Mobilization Rehabilitation following muscle energy technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Both genders

* Between the ages group of 35-60 years
* Patients with diagnosis of Sciatica.
* Straight Leg Raise\< 45°.
* Having symptoms from past one month.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inflammatory or other specific disorders of the spine such as ankylosing spondylitis, vertebral collapse, rheumatoid arthritis, stenosis, spondylolysthesis and osteoporosis.

* History of any previous spinal surgical intervention
* Symptomatic bilateral radiculopathy
* Presence of any of red flags related to spinal column
* History of involvement in any exercise program for lower extremity in recent time
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lahore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AHMAD Wassi, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Lahore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Safi Hospital

Faisalabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmad Wassi, dpt

Role: CONTACT

923247743401

Dr Asim Arif, PHD Scholar

Role: CONTACT

923216597727

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmad Wassi, DPT

Role: primary

923247743401

Muhammad Kashif shaffi, Phd*

Role: backup

923333125303

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-018-5768-9

Effectiveness of surgery for sciatica with disc herniation is not substantially affected by differences in surgical incidences among three countries: results from the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian spine registries

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pri.1572

Characterization of the incidence and risk factors for the development of lumbar radiculopathy. Clinical Spine Surgery

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-UOL-FAHS/826/2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.