Comparative Effects of Neural Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique in Sciatic Patients
NCT ID: NCT04875741
Last Updated: 2021-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-01
2021-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Muscle Energy Techniques and Sacral Manipulation on Pain, Functional Disability and Quality of Life
NCT05018780
Effects Of Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Pain And Disability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT05955781
Comparative Effects of Sciatic Nerve Flossing and Active Release Technique in Cyclists With Sciatica
NCT06827574
Comparative Effects of Muscle Energy Technique and Routine Physical Therapy on Quadratus Lumborum in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05174520
Efficacy of Muscle Energy Techniques in the Treatment of Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT05939024
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neural mobilization
Patient in this study group will get 30 minutes session, twice weekly for 6 weeks. Neural mobilization technique will be applied to the subjects in addition to conventional treatment.
Neural mobilization
Mobilization of the structures within and around the nervous system is broadly known as Neural Mobilization.
Muscle energy technique
Patient in this study group will get 30 minutes session, twice weekly for 6 weeks. Muscle energy technique will be applied to the subjects in addition to conventional treatment.
Muscle energy technique
Manual therapy technique initially developed and used by the osteopaths is known as Muscle energy techniques(MET).This technique is effective for the pain reduction, lengthening of the shortened muscle and fascia, improvement in blood circulation and promoting lymph drainage.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neural mobilization
Mobilization of the structures within and around the nervous system is broadly known as Neural Mobilization.
Muscle energy technique
Manual therapy technique initially developed and used by the osteopaths is known as Muscle energy techniques(MET).This technique is effective for the pain reduction, lengthening of the shortened muscle and fascia, improvement in blood circulation and promoting lymph drainage.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Between the ages group of 35-60 years
* Patients with diagnosis of Sciatica.
* Straight Leg Raise\< 45°.
* Having symptoms from past one month.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of any previous spinal surgical intervention
* Symptomatic bilateral radiculopathy
* Presence of any of red flags related to spinal column
* History of involvement in any exercise program for lower extremity in recent time
35 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Lahore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
AHMAD Wassi, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Lahore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Safi Hospital
Faisalabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Effectiveness of surgery for sciatica with disc herniation is not substantially affected by differences in surgical incidences among three countries: results from the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian spine registries
Characterization of the incidence and risk factors for the development of lumbar radiculopathy. Clinical Spine Surgery
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-UOL-FAHS/826/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.