Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
320 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-04-01
2030-10-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Following the release of the Danger Shock trial, MCS use is expected to rise. Hospitals will need to monitor practices and work with payers to ensure coverage. Using regional real-world data can assist this process, making the collection and analysis of MCS outcomes essential.
The NCSI (NCT03677180) aimed to evaluate outcomes with a protocolized approach prioritizing rapid diagnosis, timely MCS delivery, and invasive hemodynamic monitoring via pulmonary artery (PA) catheters. The study involved 406 patients from 2016 to 2020, with an average age of 64 years. Most (67%) had shock, with 85% on vasoactive drugs. Witnessed outof-hospital cardiac arrest occurred in 17%, and in-hospital arrest in 30%. During MCS implantation, 9% were actively resuscitating. Patients mostly in SCAI stage C/D (73%) and stage E (27%) presented with low blood pressure, high lactate, and reduced cardiac power output. About 70% received MCS before PCI, with 90% using PA catheters. Most had STEMI, with median door-to-support and door-to-balloon times of about 78 and 81 minutes. Survival rates were high: 99% procedural, 79% to discharge, 77% at 30 days, and 62% at one year for stage C/D shock. Patients with stage E shock had lower survival. Early use of MCS improved hemodynamics and survival. Further research, like the CERAMICS (Can Escalation Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarction in Cardiogenic Shock) study, aims to refine escalation strategies. The Danger Shock trial highlighted the importance of minimizing complications such as bleeding, limb ischemia, haemolysis, and kidney injury.
Currently in Hong Kong, prevalence of CS among AMI patients is 5-10%, in-line with global statistics. Among which, 30-day and 1-year mortality of AMI-CS patients in Hong Kong was reported at 29% and 39.5% respectively. Although the use of MCS has been shown in the above overseas studies to improved survival rates of AMI-CS patients, the utilisation rate of MCS among AMI-CS patients in Hong Kong was reported at 36.5% in a previous single-centre study, limited by an array of factors including limited device availability, allocations of resources and patient selection strategy, lack of region-specific evidence and device affordability. Global Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (GCSI) is an ongoing international multicenter registry involving centers from USA, Germany, and Hong Kong, and focus on the outcomes of AMI-CS patients received Impella support. The GCSI is expanding to many other regions. In the Hong Kong Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (HK-CGSI) study we aim to include sites with experience in MCS, all of whom have the capability of MCS escalation and evaluate outcomes across these centers.
The goal is not only to capture the effects of previously established best practices but gain insights into regional best practices, and together with data from the global cardiogenic shock initiative (GCSI), to better establish the adoption of novel best practices and their effect on complication rates.
In parallel to GCSI-eligible cohort, i.e. Impella used as the first supporting device for patients with AMI-CS, given the significant portion of patients who could not receive MCS under current limitations in Hong Kong, in the HK-CSI, we will include also the GCSI-ineligible cohort, i.e. AMI-CSI without using Impella or not as the first MCS used, to understand the full picture of clinical outcomes of AMI-CS patients of Hong Kong.
The HK-CSI study is an observational registry solely and not a treatment study. This single-arm registry captures data generated during procedures which are considered standard of care. Participation in this registry will be performed with waiver of consent of the patient and will have no influence on the type and extent of treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Application of Comprehensive Non-invasive Assessment To Phenotype Tricuspid Regurgitation
NCT07042360
The Current Status and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock II
NCT04143893
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Inotrope Dependent Cardiogenic Shock
NCT05298124
Safety and Feasibility of the Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair System (Trialign)
NCT04936802
Prince of Wales Hospital Structural Heart Registry
NCT07020286
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GSCI-eligible
Cases that need mechanical cardiovascular support and meet all GSCI incluision and exclusion criterias
No interventions assigned to this group
GSCI-ineligible
All other cases with Cardiogenic shock but do not meet all GSCI incluision and exclusion criterias
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cardiogenic Shock is defined as presence of at least two of the following
1. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg, or inotropes/vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg)
2. Evidence of end organ perfusion: elevated serum lactate levels (venous or arterial), cool extremities, oliguria/anuria
3. Hemodynamic criteria represented by cardiac index of \<2.2 L/min/m² or a cardiac ≤ 0.6 watts
* Patient is supported with a transvalvular MCS as the initial device (criteria for GCSI-eligible Cohort)
* Patients undergo PCI within 12 hours of hospital presentation (criteria for GCSI-eligible Cohort)
* Subject or legally designated representative (LDR) has provided written informed consent. For patients not able to provide consent, data collection will be conducted in retrospective manner with study consent waived.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients demonstrate any signs of anoxic brain injury prior to the INDEX PCI (signs of anoxic injury include, posturing, seizures).
* IABP placed prior to MCS (criteria for GCSI-eligible Cohort)
* Septic, anaphylactic, hemorrhagic, and neurologic causes of shock
* Non-ischemic causes of shock/hypotension (pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, myocarditis, tamponade, etc.)
* Active bleeding for which MCS in contraindicated
* Recent major surgery for which MCS is contraindicated
* Mechanical complication of AMI (acute ventricular septal defect (VSD) or acute papillary muscle rupture)
* Known left ventricular thrombus for which MCS in contraindicated (criteria for GCSI-eligible Cohort)
* Mechanical aortic prosthetic valve (criteria for GCSI-eligible Cohort)
* Contraindication to intravenous systemic anticoagulation which precludes placement of MCS.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
OTHER
Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Koong
UNKNOWN
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr So Chak Yu kent
Clinical Asisstant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025.671
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.