Evaluating the Efficacy of FoundationDRS Solo in Addition to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT ID: NCT07290673
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-04-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question that this study aims to answer is:
Does FoundationDRS Solo, when used in conjunction with standard of care wound management techniques, result in a higher percentage of target ulcers achieving complete closure (i.e. healing) as compared to ulcers being treated with standard of care alone after 12 weeks of treatment.
One ulcer on each participant's foot will receive weekly applications of 1) FoundationDRS Solo and standard of care wound management or 2) standard of care wound management alone. Pictures of the ulcer and measurements of its size will be measured every week to track its healing progress over a total treatment period of 12 weeks. Additionally, the participants will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about the wound impacts their life and their quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase III Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of DSC127 in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01830348
Randomized Evaluation of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers With Exclusive Wound Therapy
NCT07086443
Evaluating Several Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot and Venous Leg Ulcers.
NCT06826339
Clinical Trial Assessing Human Placental Membrane Products and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care in Nonhealing DFUs and VLUs
NCT06674980
Evaluating the Efficacy of Perinatal Membrane Allografts in Addition to the Standard of Care for the Treatment of Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
NCT06437028
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Advanced wound therapies aim to promote rapid and complete healing of chronic wounds. Examples of an advanced wound therapies include scaffolds that contain and / or mimic the structure and function of the natural extracellular matrix of tissue. Several biomimetic scaffolds have been cleared for the management of a variety of wounds (including DFU's) by the US FDA.
The focus of this clinical trial is to determine the clinical utility of treating diabetic foot ulcers with weekly applications of FoundationDRS Solo in addition to standard of care wound management techniques compared to applying standard of care wound management only.
It is hypothesized that the addition of FoundationDRS Solo to standard of care treatment will result in a higher percentage of ulcers achieving complete closure (i.e. healing) compared to ulcer being treated with standard of care alone after 12 weeks of treatment.
To test this hypothesis the study will consist of patients who will undergo standard of care for 4-weeks prior to entering a 12-week treatment phase. During the 4-week standard of care phase, patients meeting inclusion criteria (including confirmation that ulcer does not reduce in area by more than 45%) will be randomized into the treatment groups. During the 12-week treatment phase, index wounds will be treated weekly with FoundationDRS Solo and standard of care or standard of care alone.
Evaluation of data (outcome measures) associated with the trial will include intent to treat and per protocol analyses which will be performed by at least one blinded statistician and investigator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FoundationDRS Solo
FoundationDRS Solo is a porous, degradable composite scaffold composed of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate
Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) will include cleansing of the index wound with sterile normal saline solution, followed by sharp debridement to remove necrotic tissue, application of appropriate dressings and wound off-loading
FoundationDRS Solo
FoundationDRS Solo is a porous, degradable composite scaffold composed of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate
Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) will include cleansing of the index wound with sterile normal saline solution, followed by sharp debridement to remove necrotic tissue, application of appropriate dressings and wound off-loading.
Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) will include cleansing of the index wound with sterile normal saline solution, followed by sharp debridement to remove necrotic tissue, application of appropriate dressings and wound off-loading
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard of Care
Standard of care (SOC) will include cleansing of the index wound with sterile normal saline solution, followed by sharp debridement to remove necrotic tissue, application of appropriate dressings and wound off-loading
FoundationDRS Solo
FoundationDRS Solo is a porous, degradable composite scaffold composed of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects must have a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes mellitus.
3. At randomization subjects must have a target ulcer with a minimum surface area of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum surface area of 20.0 cm2 measured post debridement.
4. The target ulcer must have been present for a minimum of 4 weeks and is unresponsive to standard wound care.
5. The target ulcer must be located on the foot with at least 50% of the ulcer below the malleolus.
6. The target ulcer must be Wagner 1 or 2 grade, extending at least through the dermis or subcutaneous tissue and may involve the muscle provided it is below the medial aspect of the malleolus.
7. The affected limb must have adequate perfusion confirmed by vascular assessment. Any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit are acceptable:
1. ABI between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3;
2. TBI ≥ 0.6;
3. TCOM ≥ 40 mmHg;
4. PVR: biphasic.
Exclusion Criteria
10. The potential subject must consent to using the prescribed offloading method for the duration of the study.
11. The potential subject must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol.
12. The potential subject must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.
1. 1\. The target ulcer has been present for more than 52 weeks.
2. The ulcer includes exposed tendon or bone.
3. The potential subject is known to have a life expectancy of \< 6 months.
4. The potential subject's target ulcer is not secondary to diabetes.
5. The target ulcer is infected or has cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
6. There is evidence of osteomyelitis complicating the target ulcer.
7. The potential subject has an infection in the target ulcer or in a remote location that requires systemic antibiotic therapy.
8. The potential subject is receiving immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids at doses greater than 10 mg of Prednisone per day or equivalent) or cytotoxic chemotherapy.
9. The potential subject has applied topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month of initial screening.
10. The potential subject has a previous partial amputation on the affected foot that resulted in a deformity impeding proper offloading of the target ulcer.
11. The surface area of the potential subject's target ulcer has reduced in size by more than 45% in the 4 weeks prior to Treatment Visit 1 ("historical" run-in period\*) OR the surface area of the potential subject's target ulcer has reduced in size by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to the initial screening visit AND the surface area measurement of the potential subject's target ulcer decreases by 25% or more during the active 2-week screening phase: the 2 weeks from the initial screening visit (SV1) to the TV-1 visit.
12. The potential subject has glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) greater than or equal to 12% within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
13. The potential subject has an acute Charcot foot, or an inactive Charcot foot, that impedes proper offloading of the target ulcer.
14. The potential subject is pregnant or considering becoming pregnant within the next 6 months.
15. The potential subject has end stage renal disease requiring dialysis.
16. Participation in a clinical trial involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days.
17. The potential subject has, in the opinion of the investigator, a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.
18. The potential Subject is treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy or cellular, acellular and matrix-like products (CAMPS) in the 30 days prior to the initial screening visit.
19. A subject is excluded if they are malnourished: a score of less than 17 on the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emergent Clinical Consulting, LLC
INDUSTRY
Samaritan Biologics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SB-25-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.