Comparison of Eversion and Conventional Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT ID: NCT07288164
Last Updated: 2026-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
129 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-05-15
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of TOETVA and Conventional Thyroidectomy
NCT04647006
Ischemic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit in Esophageal Cancer.
NCT04268654
Can Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Detect Norological Morbidities for Patients Undergoing Carotis Endarterectomy
NCT06491693
Gao's Triple Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT06722222
Comparative Study Between Ligasure Versus Conventional Vessel Ligation in Thyroidectomy
NCT04108923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional endarterectomy
Who were performed conventional,primarily endarterectomy patients are included this group
Carotid endarterectomy, conventional
In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods. The conventional method is performed with a longitudinal incision extending from the common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) up to the end of the plaque. The arteriotomy is then closed either primarily or with the use of a patch. In our study, we performed only the primary closure method..
Eversion
Who were performed eversion endarterectomy patients are included this group
Carotid endarterectomy, eversion
In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods.The eversion method is performed by transecting the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the common carotid artery (CCA). The arteriotomy is then closed in an end to side fashion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Carotid endarterectomy, conventional
In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods. The conventional method is performed with a longitudinal incision extending from the common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) up to the end of the plaque. The arteriotomy is then closed either primarily or with the use of a patch. In our study, we performed only the primary closure method..
Carotid endarterectomy, eversion
In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods.The eversion method is performed by transecting the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the common carotid artery (CCA). The arteriotomy is then closed in an end to side fashion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled for concomitant cardiac surgery
* Reoperations
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kastamonu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
İsmail DAL
Assistant Professor Literally: Doctor Teaching Member
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, Clagett GP, Barnes RW, Wallace MC, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Finan JW, Hachinski VC, Barnett HJ. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999 Sep;30(9):1751-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.9.1751.
Wu S, Wang H, Guo J, Zhang F, Pan D, Ning Y, Gu Y, Guo L. Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 20;19(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02838-0.
Schneider JR, Helenowski IB, Jackson CR, Verta MJ, Zamor KC, Patel NH, Kim S, Hoel AW; Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 2015 May;61(5):1216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.049.
Jonsson M, Lindstrom D, Wanhainen A, Djavani Gidlund K, Gillgren P. Near Infrared Spectroscopy as a Predictor for Shunt Requirement During Carotid Endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
Ben Ahmed S, Daniel G, Benezit M, Ribal JP, Rosset E. Eversion carotid endarterectomy without shunt: concerning 1385 consecutive cases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Aug;58(4):543-550. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.08495-0. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
Deser SB, Demirag MK, Kolbakir F. Does surgical technique influence the postoperative hemodynamic disturbances and neurological outcomes in carotid endarterectomy? Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Apr;119(2):78-82. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1459364. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Yuruk MA, Ozdemir AC. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43908. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043908.
Yasa H, Akyuz M, Yakut N, Aslan O, Akyuz D, Ozcem B, Tulukoglu E, Gurbuz A. Comparison of two surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy: conventional and eversion. Neurochirurgie. 2014 Feb-Apr;60(1-2):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Lee JH, Suh BY. Comparative results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Oct;87(4):192-6. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.192. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
Kakisis JD, Antonopoulos CN, Moulakakis KG, Schneider F, Geroulakos G, Ricco JB. Protamine Reduces Bleeding Complications without Increasing the Risk of Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;52(3):296-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
Gahremanpour A, Perin EC, Silva G. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(4):474-87.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KastamanuU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.