Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue
NCT ID: NCT07285616
Last Updated: 2026-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2027-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLOâ„¢ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up.
This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases.
Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation.
Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients Undergoing a Boston Keratoprosthesis
NCT04232982
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery on Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT02964676
Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery -The Lowering Effect of Intraocular Pressure on Glaucoma Patients With High Frequency Deep Sclerotomy
NCT05466526
Combined Phacoemulsification and Diode Laser Therapy in Chronic Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT05576493
Three Year Outcomes of Combined Hydrus Microstent With iTrack Canaloplasty
NCT07073937
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PreserFlo with Donor Scleral Patch Graft
Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor scleral patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care (e.g., MMC/5-FU per site protocol) and scheduled follow-up (day 1; week 1-2; months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12). Outcomes include IOP, hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, reoperations, device longevity, patient-reported comfort/cosmesis, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.
PreserFlo with Corneal Patch Graft
Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a donor corneal patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complications (including erosion and hypotony), reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.
PreserFlo with Pericardial Patch Graft
Participants undergo PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation with a pericardial patch graft covering the tube. Standard perioperative care and identical follow-up schedule. Outcomes as above: IOP control, complication profile, reoperations, longevity, patient-reported outcomes, and resource use. Primary and revision cases are included per stratified randomization.
MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.
MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.
MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
3. Ability to comprehend the study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
3. Pregnant or nursing women
4. Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
5. Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
6. Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
7. Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
8. Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space
18 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00157655
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.