Low-Intensity Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room: a Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT07277244

Last Updated: 2025-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-01

Study Completion Date

2027-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to assess whether a bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation interventions reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with standard care in a robot-assisted surgical setting. The feasibility of this ventilation bundle will also be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators hypothesize that protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation during robot-assisted surgery reduces perioperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Robotic Surgery Post Operative Pulmonary Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

A guided standard of care protocol will be applied in the control group. This includes a PEEP of 5 cmH₂O, with adjustment by the anesthesia provider if SpO₂ falls below 96% or whenever deemed clinically necessary, a tidal volume of 6-10 mL/kg predicted body weight, and a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO₂ between 35 and 45 mmHg throughout anesthesia. FiO₂ will be set to 100% during the washout phase at the end of surgery to limit resorption atelectasis.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention

A bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure. All interventions consist of modification of ventilator settings.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

A bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure:

1. Recruitment maneuver
2. Tidal volume set to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and stepwise adjustment to achieve a driving pressure (Plateau pressure - PEEP) \< 13 cmH2O with a minimum tidal volume of 5ml/kg PBW
3. Respiratory rate adjustment to maintain a target end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (etCO₂) between 45 and 55 mmHg.
4. Reassessment and adaptation after Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum.
5. Re-adjustment of Tidal Volume and PEEP ventilator settings to (2.) after exsufflation and return to the supine position. FiO₂ set to 70% during the washout phase of the inhalational anesthetic until extubation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low Intensity Mechanical Ventilation

A bundle of protective low-intensity mechanical ventilation strategies will be applied throughout the procedure:

1. Recruitment maneuver
2. Tidal volume set to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and stepwise adjustment to achieve a driving pressure (Plateau pressure - PEEP) \< 13 cmH2O with a minimum tidal volume of 5ml/kg PBW
3. Respiratory rate adjustment to maintain a target end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (etCO₂) between 45 and 55 mmHg.
4. Reassessment and adaptation after Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum.
5. Re-adjustment of Tidal Volume and PEEP ventilator settings to (2.) after exsufflation and return to the supine position. FiO₂ set to 70% during the washout phase of the inhalational anesthetic until extubation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing elective intra-abdominal or pelvic robot-assisted surgery with a planned duration of at least 2 hours, under general anesthesia with planned extubation at the end of the procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Known pregnancy
* Pre-existing intubation or tracheostomy
* Contraindications for esophageal manometry: severe midface trauma or recent nasal surgery, esophageal varices, recent gastric or esophageal surgery
* Contraindications for electrical impedance tomography (EIT): inability to place EIT belt, presence of an active electronic implantable device (e.g., pacemaker, ICD)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maximilian S Schaefer

Associate Professor of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Arian Karimitar, PhD

Role: CONTACT

6176328056

Maximilian S. Schaefer, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schaefer MS, Treschan TA, Gauch J, Neukirchen M, Kienbaum P. Influence of xenon on pulmonary mechanics and lung aeration in patients with healthy lungs. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29793604 (View on PubMed)

Schaefer MS, Wania V, Bastin B, Schmalz U, Kienbaum P, Beiderlinden M, Treschan TA. Electrical impedance tomography during major open upper abdominal surgery: a pilot-study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 5;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-51. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25018668 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025P000986

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mechanical Ventilation in Surgical Patients
NCT06296277 NOT_YET_RECRUITING