Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) and Two-Dimensional Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE-EUS) in Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PA) From Other Pancreatic Solid Lesions (PSLs) and Pancreatic neuroendocrinE Tumors (pNETs) Malignancy
NCT ID: NCT07274657
Last Updated: 2025-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2028-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is admitted as the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors. Over the past 30 years, EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), or more recently fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has demonstrated its efficiency for tissue sampling and remains the gold standard for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
The assessment of pancreatic tumor enhancement using ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in real time with imaging specific methods seems useful to improve their characterization either by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) or, more recently, by contrast-harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). CH-EUS was already demonstrated useful to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other pancreatic lesions.
EUS-Elastography (EUS-E) is another EUS image enhancement technique, which rational based on the difference in elasticity between the tissues. There are two types of elastographies: strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE). SE has proved useful for the characterization of pancreatic lesions and lymph nodes. However, this technique was demonstrated difficult to perform with adequate accuracy and reproducibility for pancreatic lesions and have many limitations. In some recent publications SWE was demonstrated moderate reliability.
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare tumors, but according to the last epidemiological data, their incidence and prevalence are steadily rising.
Surgical resection is generally performed for pNETs due to their malignant potential. However, with increasing use of high-resolution conventional imaging, the significant incidence of small (≤ 2 cm) pancreatic neuroendocrine incidentaloma (pNET) has risen in recent decades.
EUS is recognized as the most sensitive procedure for the detection and characterization of pNETs. Overall sensitivity of EUS-TA for the diagnosis of pNETs is high, reaching 95.1% in recently published study, appearing higher in small lesions (≤ 20 mm) than in large lesions (\> 20 mm).
The overall concordance rate for EUS-TA and surgical specimens grading varies from 58% to 86.4% and is higher for lesions ≤ 10 mm, 10-20 mm, comparing to lesions \> 20 mm. These results confirm the risk of under or over-grading of pNETs on the EUS-TA specimen, independently of the needle size which used for the TA.
CH-EUS was also demonstrated accurate in the prediction of pNETs malignancy and useful for decision-making management of these tumors.
Hypothesis
Two new image enhancement EUS technologies were recently developed, able to assess precisely tumor microvascular density and the stiffness of pancreatic lesions, that is correlated to tumor's stroma fibrosis, and thus help to characterize and predict the malignancy, and accordingly, the management of the pancreatic solid lesions. It's particularly useful in overcoming EUS false-negative cases of PA and small pNETs malignancy diagnosis.
Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) is a novel doppler technique that enhances the range of visible blood flow, by revealing low velocity microvascular flow, enabling the capture of a higher-quality microvascular flow images. Based on the same principle as CH-EUS, which assesses tumor microvascularization, this technique is expected to be also useful for the PSLs malignancy diagnosis.
Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) relies on the properties of shear-wave propagation to offer an advanced assessment of their velocity
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Cohort Study on Screening and Follow-up of High-risk Population of PDAC Based on EUS
NCT05621824
Artificial Intelligence in EUS for Diagnosing Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT05476978
Contrast EUS of the Pancreas
NCT02863770
AI Assisted the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT05706415
Correlation Between Elastic Modulus of Ultrasonic Shear Wave and Tumor Stromal Component in Pancreatic Cancer
NCT05187416
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is the most common tumor of the pancreas, representing more than 90% of all solid pancreatic neoplasia and 55% -73% of solid pancreatic masses. Given its poor prognosis and the major therapeutic consequences, the discrimination between PA and other pancreatic solid lesions is mandatory.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is admitted as the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors. Based on only endosonographic features, it remains difficult to differentiate PA from other solid masses, the specificity (Spe) and accuracy of EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumor malignancy range from 53-69% and 72-83%, respectively.
Over the past 30 years, EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), or more recently fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has demonstrated its efficiency for tissue sampling and remains the gold standard for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
Although several prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses have shown that FNB needles are significantly superior to FNA needles for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors, the overall accuracy remains insufficient to rule out malignancy. Additional diagnostic criteria are then required.
The assessment of pancreatic tumor enhancement using ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in real time with imaging specific methods seems useful to improve their characterization either by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) or, more recently, by contrast-harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). Contrast harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), was already demonstrated useful to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other pancreatic lesions.
EUS-Elastography (EUS-E) is another EUS image enhancement technique, which rational based on the difference in elasticity between the tissues. There are two types of elastographies: strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography has proved useful for the characterization of pancreatic lesions and lymph nodes. However, this technique was demonstrated difficult to perform with adequate accuracy and reproducibility for pancreatic lesions and have many limitations. In some recent publications SWE was demonstrated moderate reliability.
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs)
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare tumors, but according to the last epidemiological data, their incidence and prevalence are steadily rising.
Surgical resection is generally performed for pNETs due to their malignant potential. However, with increasing use of high-resolution conventional imaging, the significant incidence of small (≤ 2 cm) pancreatic neuroendocrine incidentaloma (pNET) has risen in recent decades. Given their unknown natural history due to the lack of literature, the significant morbidity and mortality of pancreatic surgery, the current French and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Guidelines suggests that conservative management may also be considered for the small size (≤ 2 cm) nonfunctional, asymptomatic and without criteria for malignancy pNETs, classified as G1 or low G2 according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system lesion, after multidisciplinary discussion and patient counseling.
EUS is recognized as the most sensitive procedure for the detection and characterization of pNETs. Overall sensitivity of EUS-TA for the diagnosis of pNETs is high, reaching 95.1% in recently published study, appearing higher in small lesions (≤ 20 mm) than in large lesions (\> 20 mm).
The overall concordance rate for EUS-TA and surgical specimens grading varies from 58% to 86.4% and is higher for lesions ≤ 10 mm, 10-20 mm, comparing to lesions \> 20 mm. These results confirm the risk of under or over-grading of pNETs on the EUS-TA specimen, independently of the needle size which used for the TA.
CH-EUS was also demonstrated accurate in the prediction of pNETs malignancy and useful for decision-making management of these tumors.
Hypothesis
Two new image enhancement EUS technologies were recently developed, able to assess precisely tumor microvascular density and the stiffness of pancreatic lesions, that is correlated to tumor's stroma fibrosis, and thus help to characterize and predict the malignancy, and accordingly, the management of the pancreatic solid lesions. It's particularly useful in overcoming EUS false-negative cases of PA and small pNETs malignancy diagnosis.
Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) is a novel doppler technique that enhances the range of visible blood flow, by revealing low velocity microvascular flow, enabling the capture of a higher-quality microvascular flow images. Based on the same principle as CH-EUS, which assesses tumor microvascularization, this technique is expected to be also useful for the PSLs malignancy diagnosis.
Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) relies on the properties of shear-wave propagation to offer an advanced assessment of their velocity and tissue elasticity, presenting the results quantitatively in a dynamic display.
The new developed image enhancement EUS technologies, SMI and 2D-SWE-EUS now available on the new Aplio i800 EUS unit (Canon-Olympus).
Given the lack of published data in the literature regarding the utility of SMI and 2D-SWE-EUS, it is essential to assess the performance of these two techniques in the differential diagnosis of SPLs and pNETs malignancy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
New imaging arm
New imaging arm involves characterization and diagnosis of PA and pNETs malignancy, using the linear-array EUS scope UCT-180 Olympus and the new Aplio i800 EUS Unit (Canon Olympus - CE marked) equipped with a SMI and 2D-SWE modes
SMI and 2D-SWE modes
SMI and 2D-SWE are new imaging modes on the new Aplio i800 EUS Unit (Canon Olympus - CE marked)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SMI and 2D-SWE modes
SMI and 2D-SWE are new imaging modes on the new Aplio i800 EUS Unit (Canon Olympus - CE marked)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with diagnosed pancreatic solid or mixed (cystic component ≤25 % of tumor volume) lesion
* Patient with adequate understanding of written and spoken French, able to sign written informed consent
* Patient affiliated with a social security system
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with usual contraindications to EUS- TA
* Patient with usual contraindications to SonoVue® administration
* Patient with a genetic syndrome associated pancreatic lesion (multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF), Von-Hippel Lindau (VHL) disease)
* Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision.
* Patient unable to perform the monitoring
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-A01725-44
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.