Aspects of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Older Breast Cancer Patients - Focusing on Geriatric Screening

NCT ID: NCT07273357

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-04-01

Study Completion Date

2039-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Older breast cancer patients should not be categorically excluded from adjuvant therapies, including the recommended CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) administered in combination with endocrine therapy. Nevertheless, this population frequently presents with comorbidities that may increase susceptibility to treatment-related toxicities, including impacts on quality of life, which must be carefully considered when selecting therapeutic regimens. Given the limited representation of older patients in the clinical trials behind the recommendations for adjuvant CDK4/6i therapy, coupled with the uncertain magnitude of clinical benefit and the reported rates of toxicity and treatment discontinuation, it is essential to critically evaluate both efficacy and safety in this specific patient subgroup. National and international guidelines recommend the integration of geriatric assessments into routine clinical practice to facilitate individualized treatment decisions; however, such assessments are not yet widely implemented in many oncology departments and are not routinely in use to guide adjuvant CDK4/6i therapy.

This study aims to investigate the implementation of geriatric assessments in older breast cancer patients (≥70 years) and to examine multiple dimensions of CDK4/6i treatment in this cohort, including short- and medium-term effects on quality of life, dose intensity, and clinical outcomes. By doing so, the investigators seek to more accurately delineate the benefits and risks of adjuvant CDK4/6i therapy in this specific patient population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer incorporates many different treatment modalities. CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) were initially approved in the metastatic setting, but now also as adjuvant treatment, concomitant with endocrine therapy for patients with estrogen-receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -negative (ER+/HER2-) disease.

Only 15% of the study population in MonarchE was aged 65 and older, and the median age of 51 years is a decade younger than in the advanced setting pivotal studies. The median age in NATALEE was similarly 52 years, including only 773 out of 5,101 aged ≥65 years. Subgroup analysis from the MonarchE trial suggests benefit also in those \>65 years old, but no statistically significant results exist so far. This might be attributed to a relatively small number of older participants, and the fact that these subgroup analyses were not pre-planned.

At present, specific guidelines regarding the use of adjuvant CDK4/6i in older patients are lacking. Given the importance of tailoring adjuvant treatment in this population, the implementation of geriatric screening in patients ≥70 years who are candidates for adjuvant CDK4/6i therapy is warranted. Furthermore, it is of clinical relevance to investigate the associations between geriatric screening assessment, quality of life, treatment-related toxicity, and discontinuation in this cohort. Outcomes such as hospitalization rates, recurrence, survival, and treatment dose intensity are also of particular interest in this patient population.

The hypothesis that the use of geriatric screening in routine clinical practice will reveal a relationship between frailty and decreased quality of life and higher risk of developing CDK4/6i toxicity. The investigators moreover anticipate a correlation between higher frailty and lower dose intensity, and poorer outcomes in terms of recurrence and survival.

The overall aim of this study is to examine different aspects of adjuvant CDK4/i in older early breast cancer patients. In more detail the aims are to investigate the association between geriatric frailty assessment (based on screening by the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) screening tools in older breast cancer patients that are to be treated with adjuvant CDK4/6i, and the risk of treatment side effects, discontinuation, patients reported quality of life, and hospitalization. Moreover, the investigators aim at exploring the correlation between frailty as assessed by geriatric screening and dose intensity and this impact on recurrence/survival. As exploratory analysis, different cut-offs for G8 and VES-13 score will be investigated in order to find stronger correlation between vulnerability/frailty and long-term outcomes in this patient cohort, and finally a comparison between the G8 and VES-13 performance.

In detail, the primary objectives are:

1. Association between frailty as assessed by G8 and VES-13 screening and CDK4/6i treatment side effects (adverse event (AE) grade ≥3)
2. Association between frailty as assessed by G8 and VES-13 screening and quality of life after initiating CDK4/6i, as reported by the patient
3. Association between frailty as assessed by G8 and VES-13 screening and hospitalization due to CDK4/6i

The secondary objectivs are:
4. Association between frailty as assessed by G8 and VES-13 screening and relative dose intensity (RDI, defined as the ratio of the drug dose administered in the actual time, over the planned dose in the planned time) by CDK4/6i and impact on breast cancer recurrence, overall and breast cancer-specific survival after 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively.

As exploratory analysis the following will be performed:

1\. Explore whether different cut-offs of G8 and VES-13 score would result in a stronger correlation between vulnerability/frailty and long-term outcomes in this patient cohort. 2. Compare which geriatric screening tool that is more associated to outcomes

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Geriatric Assessment Adjuvant Drug Therapy Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Frail and fit older (≥70 years) breast cancer patients

Older (≥70 years) patients, with early stage breast cancer, initiating adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors that are defined as frail or fit according to G8 and VES-13

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥70 years old
* Female/male
* Completed surgery (primary or after neoadjuvant therapy)
* Starting adjuvant CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy
* Cognitive performance to be able answer questionaries
* No language difficulties

Exclusion Criteria

* Impaired cognitive function not able to understand the study intention or perform questionaries
* Declining adjuvant CDK4/6i
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Örebro County

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Östergötland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Gävleborg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Västra Götalandsregionen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Örebro University, Sweden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kalmar County Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Jönköping County

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christine Lundgren

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christine Lundgren, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oncology, Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping; Sweden,

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Oncology

Gävle, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Oncology

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Oncology

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Oncology

Kalmar, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Oncology

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Oncology

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christine Lundgren, MD

Role: CONTACT

+46102422907

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ilke Cikman, MD

Role: primary

Karolina Larsson, MD

Role: primary

Christine Lundgren, MD

Role: primary

+46102422907

Petra Hinnen, MD

Role: primary

Jimmy Ekstrand, MD

Role: primary

Antonios Valachis, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPM 2025-06207-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.