Antiestrogen vs Aromatase Inhibitor After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00437359

Last Updated: 2012-03-30

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE2
• Total Enrollment: 240 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2007-05-31
• Study Completion Date: 2020-05-31

Brief Summary

To investigate the benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy using sequential administration of the hormone, toremifene citrate (TOR) or anastrozole (ANA), after chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Detailed Description

To investigate the benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy using sequential administration of the hormone, toremifene citrate (TOR) or anastrozole (ANA), after chemotherapy in breast cancer.

TOR is reported to be as effective, or more effective, than TAM on both DFS and OS for postoperative adjuvant therapy. The incidence rate and severity of its adverse effects are similar to those of TAM as shown in two clinical trials, the Finnish Breast Cancer Group (FBCG) and the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Although no significant difference was observed in these trials, other studies report that TOR produced a lower number of thromboembolism events compared with TAM, a undesirable side effect seen in patients treated with TAM. Additionally, compared with TAM, TOR showed less endometrial hypertrophy which is induced by estrogen.

Endometrial cancer remains one of the significant problems associated with TAM. A TAM metabolite binds to DNA and forms DNA adducts which damage cells. It is reported that TAM has an expanded ability to form DNA adducts compared with TOR in vitro. A recent study compared endometrial cells collected from patients in which TAM or TOR had been administered. The k-ras gene mutation was investigated in these cases, and it showed that TAM held a higher frequency of gene mutation. Although we still need to discuss whether or not k-ras mutation is directly related to the development of endometrial cancer, TAM seems to have a higher risk of inducing cancer compared with TOR.

In the IBCSG14-93 trials, two chemotherapy protocols were studied subsequent to administration of TOR. They were doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). These two chemotherapy protocols were administered in the following sequence: AC four times followed by CMF three times after administration of TOR. The findings revealed that in estrogen-receptor (ER) positive cases, DFS equaled 73% in the TOR group, 65% in the TAM group; hormone receptor (HR=0.80 (0.57-1.11); P=0.18). OS was found to total 88% in the TOR group, 84% in the TAM group; HR=0.78 (0.48-1.27); p=0.32). Although there was no significant difference in two groups, the TOR group has showed somewhat improved survival.

Based on the information provided above, we consider TAM and TOR to have similar efficacy with less adverse effects, and this trial will compare the two drugs, TOR and ANA.

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Fareston

Toremifene citrate: 40-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Group Type: OTHER

Toremifene citrate

Intervention Type: DRUG

Toremifene citrate: 40-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Arimidex

Anastrozole: 1-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Group Type: OTHER

Anastrozole

Intervention Type: DRUG

Anastrozole: 1-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Interventions

Toremifene citrate

Toremifene citrate: 40-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Intervention Type: DRUG

Anastrozole

Anastrozole: 1-mg tablets by mouth once daily.

Intervention Type: DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Fareston; Arimidex

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Written consent obtained for study participation.
• Breast cancer diagnosed histologically with a breast removed or preserved.
• Positive ER or PR testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC), enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and who meet the criteria of each institution.
• HER2 evaluation.
• Patient Status (PS): 0 or 1.
• Fully functional heart, liver, kidneys, and bone marrow.
• More than one year since last menstruation or tested postmenopausal from estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels based on evaluation standard of each institution.
• Expected to live for at least three months (or longer) after study commencement.

Exclusion Criteria

• Pregnant or breast feeding.
• Bilateral or inflammatory breast cancer.
• Multiple cancers.
• Life-threatening metastases.
• History of serious hypersensitivity.
• Judged ineligible for the study by the study doctor.

• Eligible Sex: FEMALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Japan Breast Cancer Research Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Satoru Iwase, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Palliative Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital

Locations

Kyushu Central Hospital

Fukuoka, , Japan

Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital

Hirakata, , Japan

Hirosaki University Hospital

Hirosaki, , Japan

Hiroshima University Hospital

Hiroshima, , Japan

Shinyahashiradai Hospital

Matsudo, , Japan

The University of Tokyo Hospital

Tokyo, , Japan

Nagumo Clinic

Tokyo, , Japan

Countries

Japan

Other Identifiers

UMIN000000610

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

JBCRN-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id