Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Sleep Quality After Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT07272954

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

136 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-12-01

Study Completion Date

2029-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to design a prospective, randomized, controlled, dual-center, non-inferiority trial to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided sympathetic ganglion block (SGB) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on sleep quality following radical mastectomy for breast cancer. The objective is to explore whether non-invasive neuromodulation for sleep is non-inferior to invasive neuromodulation. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SGB or taVNS treatment. Sleep quality will be assessed using an actigraphy device and sleep scales within four days post-surgery, and the incidence of sleep disturbances will be followed up within 30 days post-surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sleep Disorder (Disorder)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stellate Ganglion Block(SGB)

Before the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a SGB under sterile conditions using real-time ultrasound in a blind grouping manner.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SGB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Before the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a SGB under sterile conditions using real-time ultrasound in a blind grouping manner. The patient was positioned supine with the neck slightly rotated to the left. A linear probe (6-13 MHz) was placed on the neck to clearly visualize the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, vertebral artery, vagus nerve, thyroid gland, esophagus, scalene muscles, and the anterior scalene muscle at the C6 level. Subsequently, a 48mm, 20-gauge needle was inserted in a "plane" direction into the prevertebral fascia of the anterior scalene muscle. After the needle tip penetrated the prevertebral fascia and negative pressure aspiration was confirmed, 3ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected, and the diffusion of the local anesthetic was observed under ultrasound guidance.

transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation(taVNS)

Three stimulations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) were administered to the patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

taVNS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Three stimulations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) were administered to the patients: ① According to the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies \[32\], the initial adjustment required electrical stimulation to penetrate the skin barrier. The first intervention was conducted one day prior to the surgery, with an initial electrical stimulation frequency set at 30 Hz and a pulse width of 300 μs. The frequency and pulse width were adjusted based on the individual patient's sensations until the maximum tolerable current stimulation was reached without discomfort, lasting for 30 minutes; ② The second intervention occurred immediately after the patient was connected to the monitoring equipment in the operating room, once their vital signs were confirmed to be within normal ranges. The same stimulation frequency as the first intervention was applied for 30 minutes; ③ The third intervention was administered in the recovery room after the patient's surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SGB

Before the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a SGB under sterile conditions using real-time ultrasound in a blind grouping manner. The patient was positioned supine with the neck slightly rotated to the left. A linear probe (6-13 MHz) was placed on the neck to clearly visualize the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, vertebral artery, vagus nerve, thyroid gland, esophagus, scalene muscles, and the anterior scalene muscle at the C6 level. Subsequently, a 48mm, 20-gauge needle was inserted in a "plane" direction into the prevertebral fascia of the anterior scalene muscle. After the needle tip penetrated the prevertebral fascia and negative pressure aspiration was confirmed, 3ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected, and the diffusion of the local anesthetic was observed under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

taVNS

Three stimulations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) were administered to the patients: ① According to the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies \[32\], the initial adjustment required electrical stimulation to penetrate the skin barrier. The first intervention was conducted one day prior to the surgery, with an initial electrical stimulation frequency set at 30 Hz and a pulse width of 300 μs. The frequency and pulse width were adjusted based on the individual patient's sensations until the maximum tolerable current stimulation was reached without discomfort, lasting for 30 minutes; ② The second intervention occurred immediately after the patient was connected to the monitoring equipment in the operating room, once their vital signs were confirmed to be within normal ranges. The same stimulation frequency as the first intervention was applied for 30 minutes; ③ The third intervention was administered in the recovery room after the patient's surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged 18-80 years who underwent radical surgery for breast cancer
* ASA I-III

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Patients with coagulation dysfunction;
* Patients with suspected regional infection leading to severe nerve damage in the affected limb;
* Patients with congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, severe cardiac conduction block, or those with implanted cardiac pacemakers;
* Patients with severe neurological disorders such as cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or stroke;
* Patients with pain, lesions, infections, or unresolved external ear trauma in the area near the external ear;
* Patients with severe mental illness or a history of substance abuse related to analgesics or psychiatric medications;
* Patients with allergies to local anesthetics such as lidocaine or ropivacaine, as well as to general anesthetics;
* Patients and their families who refuse surgical anesthesia and those unable to complete the survey questionnaire.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Qing-he Zhou

PHD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mingzi An

Role: CONTACT

+8618035193080

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-LP-777

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.