Evaluating the Clinical Value of Transparent Cap-Assisted Second Examination of the Sigmoid Colon for Improving Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rates
NCT ID: NCT07261319
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
614 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-15
2027-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transparent Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Combined With Computer-Aided Detection in Improving the Detection Rate of Colorectal Adenomas
NCT07097350
Second Forward View Examination of Proximal Colon on Adenoma Detection Rate
NCT03619122
Transanal Tube Drainage in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of the Colorectal Tumor
NCT02973490
Impact of SFV of Proximal Colon on ADR
NCT04963010
The Real-time Optical Diagnosis Value of Optical Enhancement Endoscopy in Colorectal Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps
NCT03238573
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Interval CRC refers to cancers diagnosed before the next recommended examination after a negative screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an independent predictor of interval CRC risk; long-term follow-up data suggest that every 1% increase in ADR corresponds to a 5% reduction in the risk of interval CRC and a 3% reduction in mortality. However, emerging evidence indicates that interval CRC can still occur even among endoscopists with high ADRs, suggesting that some precancerous lesions may still be missed.
The main contributors to missed colorectal adenomas include: (1) operator-related factors such as fatigue, reduced attention, or limited lesion recognition; (2) image-related factors such as low-resolution visualization; and (3) inadequate mucosal exposure due to residual folds. In recent years, several studies have explored the use of "repeat intubation" to reduce missed adenomas. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have shown that a second examination can increase ADR, but most studies have focused on the right colon and often relied on chromoendoscopy or other image-enhancement modalities to improve lesion visibility. Evidence regarding second intubation specifically for the sigmoid colon remains limited, and even fewer studies have evaluated interventions based on transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy. Given that the sigmoid colon is a common site for missed polyps and adenomas, optimizing visualization in this segment may have a significant impact on overall ADR and CRC prevention.
In summary, there is still a lack of clinical evidence on whether transparent cap-assisted second intubation of the sigmoid colon can improve colorectal adenoma detection. A randomized controlled trial in the Chinese population is therefore needed to clarify its clinical value, with the potential to increase lesion detection and improve the overall quality of colonoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
Standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
standard second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
transparent cap-assisted second examination of the sigmoid colon
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with highly suspected or pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer
* Patients presenting with alarm symptoms or signs (hematochezia, melena, unexplained anemia or weight loss, palpable abdominal mass, or a positive digital rectal examination)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction
* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, or serrated polyposis syndrome
* Patients who have taken anticoagulants (e.g., aspirin, warfarin) within 7 days before colonoscopy or who have coagulation disorders
* Patients currently enrolled in another clinical study or who participated in any clinical trial within the past 60 days
* Insertion failure for any reason (e.g., scope cannot pass an obstruction, patient cannot tolerate the procedure) or colonoscopy not reaching the cecum
* A Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score \< 6 at scope insertion (inadequate preparation requiring repeat bowel cleansing)
* Use of non-guideline-recommended bowel preparation agents
* Patients undergoing emergency colonoscopy
* Inadequate withdrawal time (defined as a withdrawal time \<6 minutes during the first examination or \<2 minutes during the second examination)
45 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fudan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhijun Bao
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Danian Ji
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Huadong Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Huadong hospital, Fudan university
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025K351
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.