Machine Learning for Predicting Spinal Anesthesia Duration
NCT ID: NCT07256548
Last Updated: 2025-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-10-31
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Femoral Blockade and Low-dose Spinal Anesthesia in Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
NCT02322372
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Critically Adult Patients Undergoing Femur Surgery
NCT06652334
Prediction of Block Height of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT05024838
Comparison of Two Regional Technics In Knee Artroplasty
NCT03021421
Concentration Effect of Local Anesthetics on Femoral Nerve Block Efficiency
NCT03623230
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spinal anesthesia offers several advantages over general anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays. It also minimizes anesthesia-related complications and facilitates early mobilization, making it a preferred technique for many orthopedic procedures. However, predicting the exact duration of spinal anesthesia remains challenging and is clinically significant for ensuring patient safety, optimizing postoperative pain control, and preventing anesthesia-related complications.
Accurate estimation of anesthesia duration allows for more effective surgical planning, timely analgesia administration, and improved patient satisfaction. Unexpectedly prolonged anesthesia may increase the risk of adverse effects, whereas premature termination can result in inadequate pain management.
Machine learning (ML) technologies offer promising tools for predicting clinical outcomes in anesthesia practice by analyzing complex, multidimensional datasets. Previous research has demonstrated the potential of ML algorithms to predict perioperative events such as hypotension, blood transfusion requirements, and postoperative complications.
In this study, the usability and effectiveness of ML models in predicting the time of termination of spinal anesthesia and the patient's readiness for mobilization were investigated. By incorporating multiple clinical variables-such as patient demographics, anesthetic drug dosages, and surgical factors-our model aims to provide accurate, data-driven predictions. These predictive insights can support anesthesiologists in tailoring perioperative management, reducing complication risks, and improving overall patient outcomes. Ultimately, integrating ML-based prediction systems into anesthesia practice may enhance the safety, efficiency, and personalization of perioperative care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Knee Arthroplasty Group
The group of patients who will undergo knee replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia
Spinal Anesthesia (bupivacaine)
Before being placed on the operating table, the patient is positioned comfortably and prepared for the procedure. Standardized monitoring is initiated, including five-lead electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), and pulse oximetry (SpO₂). Baseline measurements of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation are recorded. An 18- or 20-gauge intravenous line is inserted, and an appropriate crystalloid preload is administered. After ensuring aseptic conditions, the patient is positioned in the sitting posture, and spinal puncture is performed at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral space using a 25 Gauge Whitacre needle. Following free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10-15 mg) is slowly injected. The completion of the injection is
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spinal Anesthesia (bupivacaine)
Before being placed on the operating table, the patient is positioned comfortably and prepared for the procedure. Standardized monitoring is initiated, including five-lead electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), and pulse oximetry (SpO₂). Baseline measurements of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation are recorded. An 18- or 20-gauge intravenous line is inserted, and an appropriate crystalloid preload is administered. After ensuring aseptic conditions, the patient is positioned in the sitting posture, and spinal puncture is performed at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral space using a 25 Gauge Whitacre needle. Following free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10-15 mg) is slowly injected. The completion of the injection is
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have provided written informed consent to participate in the study.
3. Patients whose surgery is planned under spinal anesthesia.
4. Patients for whom complete clinical data can be obtained during the study period.
5. Adults aged 18 years or older, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologist's (ASA) Physical Status I or II.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who required postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission following anesthesia.
3. Patients who developed surgical complications and for whom postoperative mobilization could not be planned.
4. Patients with cognitive impairment preventing them from completing pain assessment scales in the postoperative period.
5. Patients with neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, or other neuromotor disorders will be excluded from the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kocaeli City Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sıddık Varolgunes
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmet Yüksek, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Kocaeli City Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kocaeli City Hospital
Kocaeli, İzmit, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bellini V, Russo M, Domenichetti T, Panizzi M, Allai S, Bignami EG. Artificial Intelligence in Operating Room Management. J Med Syst. 2024 Feb 14;48(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02038-2.
Cao Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Wu L. Artificial intelligence revolutionizing anesthesia management: advances and prospects in intelligent anesthesia technology. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 6;12:1571725. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1571725. eCollection 2025.
Magdic Turkovic T, Sabo G, Babic S, Sostaric S. SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN DAY SURGERY - EARLY EXPERIENCES. Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Sep;61(Suppl 2):160-164. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s2.22.
Boublik J, Gupta R, Bhar S, Atchabahian A. Prilocaine spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: A review of the available studies. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Dec;35(6):417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Schubert AK, Wiesmann T, Wulf H, Dinges HC. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun;37(2):109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KSH_SVG_1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.