Pre Hospital Triage of Patients at Intermediate and High Risk for ACS

NCT ID: NCT07252245

Last Updated: 2025-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1048 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2030-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a treatment strategy that includes direct referral to a PCI center for intermediate to high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), both cost-effective and non-inferior for major adverse cardiac events (MACE)? HYPOTHESIS: Prehospital triage with the modified \[History-ECG-Age-Risk factors\] (HEAR) score and a high sensitivity (hs) point-of-care troponin (POCT) leads to a faster diagnosis of ACS, faster time to coronary angiography (CAG) and/or treatment with PCI, shorter length of stay, quicker availability of ambulances and more satisfaction and quality of life of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. STUDY POPULATION: Patients ≥18 years with an intermediate to high risk for NSTE -ACS (defined as a modified HEAR score ≥ 4) INTERVENTION: applying modified HEAR score and hs POCT to identify patients for direct rule out (very low risk), transfer to the nearest hospital for rapid rule-out and/or fast-track diagnosis by CT coronary imaging (intermediate risk) or direct referral to a PCI center for CAG (high risk).

USUAL CARE/COMPARISON: Assessment of ACS at the nearest hospital. In case PCI is scheduled: transfer to nearest PCI center.

OUTCOME MEASURES: primary endpoints: healthcare costs and non-inferiority for MACE (all cause death, confirmed ACS, re ACS, and unplanned PCI or CABG) at 30 days. Secondary: MACE after rule out ACS at 30 days, Quality of life (EQ5D5L) and cost-effectiveness at 12 months.

SAMPLE SIZE: 1048 patients. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS / BIA: It is expected that the intervention group will reduce healthcare costs and potentially improve health-related quality of life in this target population. Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as cost per QALY gained. We assume a large potential saving more than € 37 million if 100% implemented. TIME SCHEDULE: 48 months; 36 month inclusion, follow-up 12 months

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Each year, 230.000 patients in the Netherlands seek medical attention for acute chest pain. The majority of these patients (67%) are at intermediate to high risk of developing non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Immediate ambulance transport to the nearest emergency department (ED) remains the standard of care. The availability of clinical decision rules, along with new high-sensitivity (hs) POC troponin analyzers, presents new opportunities for the early identification of higher-risk patients, potentially improving healthcare logistic. Currently, only observational data are available regarding these groups. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) on a prehospital strategy that includes a rapid rule out or fast-track diagnosis care path for the intermediate risk group or direct referral to a PCI center for the higher risk group has not been studied in a RCT before. More data are needed on prehospital strategies in high-risk groups, focusing on costs and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Objective: To assess healthcare costs and safety (MACE) at 30 days of an integrated pre-hospital triage strategy using the \[History-ECG-Age-Risk factors\] HEAR score and hs POC troponin for patients at intermediate to high risk of NSTE ACS. Secondary objective includes MACE after rule-out ACS at 30 days and cost-effectiveness and quality of life at 12 months.

Study design: Randomized clinical trial (pragmatic strategy trial) Sample size calculation: 1048 patients. A MACE rate of 20% for all risk groups in both the standard and intervention groups: sample sizes of 476 per group to achieve 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin of 0.0800. The reference group proportion is 0.2000, and the treatment group proportion is 0.2800 under the null hypothesis of inferiority. Power was calculated assuming the actual treatment group proportion is 0.2 Study population: Patients ≥18 years with an intermediate to high risk for NSTE-ACS (defined as a modified HEAR score ≥ 4) Intervention: applying modified HEAR score and hs POC troponin to identify patients for direct rule out (low risk), transfer to the nearest hospital for rapid rule-out and/or fast-track diagnosis in which non-invasive imaging is strongly recommended (intermediate risk) or direct referral to a PCI center (high risk).

Main study parameters/endpoints: primary endpoints: healthcare costs and non-inferiority for MACE (all cause death, confirmed ACS, re ACS, and unplanned PCI or CABG) at 30 days. Secondary: MACE after ruling out ACS at 30 days, Quality of life (EQ5D5L) and cost-effectiveness at 12 months.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Two-thirds of ACS patients are intermediate to high risk and standard hospital evaluation remain the standard of care. In this study the randomized group will receive a patient tailored prehospital management (conservative, local hospital with non-invasive imaging testing, or direct PCI referral). This strategy may safely reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, costs and efficient hospital transfers. While increasing the time to diagnosis of NSTE ACS

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Strategy study:

A) intervention group: Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin: pre- hospital triage decision-making for intermediate and high risk patients:

B) Standard care group: all intermediate and high risk patients are referred to the nearest hospital to rule-out or rule-in ACS
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:

Intervention Type OTHER

Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making: low risk (HEAR score 4 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL)) will be treated conservatively (i.e. referred to the general practitioner); intermediate risk (HEAR score ≥5 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile URL or HEAR score 4-6 with intermediate elevated hs POC troponin (i.e. hs POC troponin between 1 and 3 times the 99th percentile URL) are admitted to the nearest hospital with a rapid rule out strategy or recommendation for fast-track coronary CT imaging (CTCA); high risk group (HEAR ≥ 7 ánd hs POC troponin \> 99th percentile URL or any HEAR score with hs POC troponin 3x \> 99th URL will be directly referred to a PCI center

Standard care group

intermediate and high risk patients referred to the nearest hospital for standard care. The ACS rule-out protocol follows the 2023 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). In confirmed cases of ACS, patients should be scheduled for invasive coronary angiography within the recommended time window as outlined by the ESC guidelines

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:

Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making: low risk (HEAR score 4 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL)) will be treated conservatively (i.e. referred to the general practitioner); intermediate risk (HEAR score ≥5 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile URL or HEAR score 4-6 with intermediate elevated hs POC troponin (i.e. hs POC troponin between 1 and 3 times the 99th percentile URL) are admitted to the nearest hospital with a rapid rule out strategy or recommendation for fast-track coronary CT imaging (CTCA); high risk group (HEAR ≥ 7 ánd hs POC troponin \> 99th percentile URL or any HEAR score with hs POC troponin 3x \> 99th URL will be directly referred to a PCI center

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* All out-of-hospital patients with chest pain or symptoms suggestive of ACS with an indication for transfer to the (cardiac) emergency department to evaluate and rule out ACS
* Modified HEAR(T) score ≥ 4
* The patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation (STEMI)
* Patients with confirmed myocardial infarction, PCI or CABG \<14 days prior to inclu-sion
* Patients presenting an obvious non-cardiac cause for the chest complaints who need evaluation at an emergency department, e.g. trauma, pneumothorax, sepsis, etc.
* Patients in comatose state, defined as an EMV \<8
* Patients with known cognitive impairment
* Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
* Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, defined as: systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg and heart rate \>100 and peripheral oxygen saturation \<90% (without oxygen administration)
* Patients presenting with syncope
* Patients presenting with signs of heart failure
* Patients presenting with second or third degree atrioventricular block
* Patients without known supraventricular tachycardia i.e. unknown atrial fibrillation (known atrial fibrillation with adequate rate control can be included)
* Patients with known end-stage renal disease (dialysis and/or GFR \< 30 ml/min)
* Patients without a pre-hospital 12-lead ECG performed or available
* Patients suspicious of aortic dissection or pulmonary embolism
* Communication issues with patient/language barrier
* Any significant medical or mental condition, which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ambulance services Veiligheidsregio Gelderland-Zuid

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Slingeland Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maas Hospital Pantein

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rijnstate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RAV Brabant MWN

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cyril Camaro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cyril Camaro

Cyril Camaro, PI ARTICA-2

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cyril Camaro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboudumc / department Cardiology 616

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboudumc Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cyril Camaro, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31243616785

Cyril Camaro

Role: CONTACT

+31243616785

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10390042410064

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NL-010807

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.