Pre Hospital Triage of Patients at Intermediate and High Risk for ACS
NCT ID: NCT07252245
Last Updated: 2025-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1048 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2030-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
USUAL CARE/COMPARISON: Assessment of ACS at the nearest hospital. In case PCI is scheduled: transfer to nearest PCI center.
OUTCOME MEASURES: primary endpoints: healthcare costs and non-inferiority for MACE (all cause death, confirmed ACS, re ACS, and unplanned PCI or CABG) at 30 days. Secondary: MACE after rule out ACS at 30 days, Quality of life (EQ5D5L) and cost-effectiveness at 12 months.
SAMPLE SIZE: 1048 patients. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS / BIA: It is expected that the intervention group will reduce healthcare costs and potentially improve health-related quality of life in this target population. Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as cost per QALY gained. We assume a large potential saving more than € 37 million if 100% implemented. TIME SCHEDULE: 48 months; 36 month inclusion, follow-up 12 months
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: the TRIAGE-ACS Study
NCT05243485
Remote Ischemic Conditioning With Local Ischemic Postconditioning in High-Risk ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT04844931
Short-term Outcomes of Elective High-risk PCI With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: a Single-centre Registry
NCT05387902
CardiOvascular Risk and idEntificAtion of Potential High-risk Population in Acute Myocardial Infarction II (COREA-AMI II)
NCT02806102
Physiologic Assessment of Thrombus Aspiration in Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
NCT01824641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To assess healthcare costs and safety (MACE) at 30 days of an integrated pre-hospital triage strategy using the \[History-ECG-Age-Risk factors\] HEAR score and hs POC troponin for patients at intermediate to high risk of NSTE ACS. Secondary objective includes MACE after rule-out ACS at 30 days and cost-effectiveness and quality of life at 12 months.
Study design: Randomized clinical trial (pragmatic strategy trial) Sample size calculation: 1048 patients. A MACE rate of 20% for all risk groups in both the standard and intervention groups: sample sizes of 476 per group to achieve 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin of 0.0800. The reference group proportion is 0.2000, and the treatment group proportion is 0.2800 under the null hypothesis of inferiority. Power was calculated assuming the actual treatment group proportion is 0.2 Study population: Patients ≥18 years with an intermediate to high risk for NSTE-ACS (defined as a modified HEAR score ≥ 4) Intervention: applying modified HEAR score and hs POC troponin to identify patients for direct rule out (low risk), transfer to the nearest hospital for rapid rule-out and/or fast-track diagnosis in which non-invasive imaging is strongly recommended (intermediate risk) or direct referral to a PCI center (high risk).
Main study parameters/endpoints: primary endpoints: healthcare costs and non-inferiority for MACE (all cause death, confirmed ACS, re ACS, and unplanned PCI or CABG) at 30 days. Secondary: MACE after ruling out ACS at 30 days, Quality of life (EQ5D5L) and cost-effectiveness at 12 months.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Two-thirds of ACS patients are intermediate to high risk and standard hospital evaluation remain the standard of care. In this study the randomized group will receive a patient tailored prehospital management (conservative, local hospital with non-invasive imaging testing, or direct PCI referral). This strategy may safely reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, costs and efficient hospital transfers. While increasing the time to diagnosis of NSTE ACS
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
A) intervention group: Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin: pre- hospital triage decision-making for intermediate and high risk patients:
B) Standard care group: all intermediate and high risk patients are referred to the nearest hospital to rule-out or rule-in ACS
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:
Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:
Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making: low risk (HEAR score 4 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL)) will be treated conservatively (i.e. referred to the general practitioner); intermediate risk (HEAR score ≥5 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile URL or HEAR score 4-6 with intermediate elevated hs POC troponin (i.e. hs POC troponin between 1 and 3 times the 99th percentile URL) are admitted to the nearest hospital with a rapid rule out strategy or recommendation for fast-track coronary CT imaging (CTCA); high risk group (HEAR ≥ 7 ánd hs POC troponin \> 99th percentile URL or any HEAR score with hs POC troponin 3x \> 99th URL will be directly referred to a PCI center
Standard care group
intermediate and high risk patients referred to the nearest hospital for standard care. The ACS rule-out protocol follows the 2023 Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). In confirmed cases of ACS, patients should be scheduled for invasive coronary angiography within the recommended time window as outlined by the ESC guidelines
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making:
Integrating the HEAR score and hs POC troponin into pre hospital triage decision-making: low risk (HEAR score 4 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL)) will be treated conservatively (i.e. referred to the general practitioner); intermediate risk (HEAR score ≥5 and hs POC troponin \< 99th percentile URL or HEAR score 4-6 with intermediate elevated hs POC troponin (i.e. hs POC troponin between 1 and 3 times the 99th percentile URL) are admitted to the nearest hospital with a rapid rule out strategy or recommendation for fast-track coronary CT imaging (CTCA); high risk group (HEAR ≥ 7 ánd hs POC troponin \> 99th percentile URL or any HEAR score with hs POC troponin 3x \> 99th URL will be directly referred to a PCI center
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All out-of-hospital patients with chest pain or symptoms suggestive of ACS with an indication for transfer to the (cardiac) emergency department to evaluate and rule out ACS
* Modified HEAR(T) score ≥ 4
* The patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with confirmed myocardial infarction, PCI or CABG \<14 days prior to inclu-sion
* Patients presenting an obvious non-cardiac cause for the chest complaints who need evaluation at an emergency department, e.g. trauma, pneumothorax, sepsis, etc.
* Patients in comatose state, defined as an EMV \<8
* Patients with known cognitive impairment
* Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
* Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, defined as: systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg and heart rate \>100 and peripheral oxygen saturation \<90% (without oxygen administration)
* Patients presenting with syncope
* Patients presenting with signs of heart failure
* Patients presenting with second or third degree atrioventricular block
* Patients without known supraventricular tachycardia i.e. unknown atrial fibrillation (known atrial fibrillation with adequate rate control can be included)
* Patients with known end-stage renal disease (dialysis and/or GFR \< 30 ml/min)
* Patients without a pre-hospital 12-lead ECG performed or available
* Patients suspicious of aortic dissection or pulmonary embolism
* Communication issues with patient/language barrier
* Any significant medical or mental condition, which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ambulance services Veiligheidsregio Gelderland-Zuid
UNKNOWN
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)
UNKNOWN
Slingeland Hospital
OTHER
Maas Hospital Pantein
OTHER
Rijnstate Hospital
OTHER
RAV Brabant MWN
OTHER
Cyril Camaro
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cyril Camaro
Cyril Camaro, PI ARTICA-2
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cyril Camaro, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboudumc / department Cardiology 616
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboudumc Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10390042410064
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL-010807
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.