Effective Myocardial Protection Time of Del Nido Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07249424
Last Updated: 2025-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-12
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myocardial Injury Noncardiac Surgery in Geriatric Patients
NCT06957106
The Sublingual Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Flow Conditions
NCT02144298
Investigation of Myocardial Protection Efficacy of Cardioplegia Solutions Used in Open Heart Surgery
NCT06373549
Protection During Cardiac Surgery.
NCT03230136
Effect of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy on AKI and Outcomes in Isolated CABG Surgery
NCT07254468
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Design and Setting Prospective, single-center, observational cohort conducted at Necmettin Erbakan University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Türkiye).
Population Adults 18-80 years scheduled for elective valve and/or thoracic aortic surgery under CPB with ACC in which Del Nido cardioplegia is used per institutional routine. Key exclusions include isolated or CABG-dominant procedures, redo sternotomy, emergency/salvage or preoperative shock, IABP/ECMO, LVEF \<35%, eGFR \<45 mL/min/1.73 m², significant pulmonary or hepatic disease, major coagulopathy, active infection/sepsis or endocarditis, pregnancy, and preoperative troponin elevation.
Interventions None. Cardioplegia content, dose, route (antegrade/retrograde/combined), temperature, and re-dose decisions are entirely per standard practice at the discretion of the surgical/anesthesia/perfusion team. No experimental therapy is administered.
Sampling Schedule (Biomarkers) Preoperative baseline hs-cTn; intraoperative sampling referenced to ACC at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, then intensified at 75, 90, 105, and 120 minutes. If a re-dose is administered, additional samples at pre-re-dose and +15/+30/+45/+60 minutes. Postoperative hs-cTn at approximately 6, 24, and 48 hours. Intraoperative blood is obtained preferably from the venous reservoir or existing central lines. Each draw \~3-5 mL; total additional volume \~30-40 mL. Exploratory CK-MB may be recorded where available.
Outcomes Primary outcome: intraoperative hs-cTn change-point time (minutes from ACC) identified by segmented (piecewise) trend analysis indicating the earliest sustained acceleration compatible with evolving ischemic injury.
Key secondary outcomes: (i) association between change-point and ACC duration; (ii) presence/timing of Del Nido re-dose and biochemical response to re-dose (slope change pre/post); (iii) early clinical outcomes including low cardiac output syndrome, maximum VIS in the first 24 h, new arrhythmia or pacemaker need, acute kidney injury by KDIGO, ventilation hours, ICU/hospital length of stay, re-exploration/bleeding, infection, 30-day MACE, and 30-day all-cause mortality.
Statistical Plan (Summary) Individual time series will be analyzed using segmented (piecewise) regression and/or change-point detection methods. Group-level estimates (mean protection window and variance) will be obtained via mixed-effects change-point models. Associations with durations (ACC, CPB), re-dose timing, and outcomes will use linear/quantile regression and logistic/Poisson/negative binomial models as appropriate. Missing data will be handled per predefined rules and, if needed, multiple imputation. Target enrollment is 80 participants, anticipated to provide \~80% power at α=0.05 to detect a clinically meaningful change-point and slope shift in hs-troponin trajectories.
Safety and Data Handling Risk is minimal and limited to low-volume blood sampling aligned with routine care; no experimental treatment is given. Data are recorded on standardized case report forms and stored in secure, de-identified systems compliant with local regulations. Serious adverse events are reported per institutional/authority requirements.
Significance By quantifying the actual protection window and its variability, the study is designed to inform more rational-potentially individualized-re-dose timing for Del Nido cardioplegia, aiming to reduce both under-protection (late re-dose) and workflow disruption (unnecessary early re-dose).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Del Nido Cardioplegia Cohort
Adults undergoing elective valve and/or thoracic aortic surgery under CPB with ACC in which Del Nido cardioplegia is used per routine practice. No experimental therapy; only study-specific blood sampling for hs-troponin at predefined times.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elective valve surgery (aortic, mitral, tricuspid), thoracic aortic surgery, or combined valve + thoracic aortic procedures
* Planned cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with aortic cross-clamp (ACC)
* Use of Del Nido cardioplegia per institutional routine
* Ability to provide written informed consent (participant or legally authorized representative)
Exclusion Criteria
* Redo sternotomy
* Emergency status (including shock) or preoperative mechanical circulatory support (IABP or ECMO), or anticipated need for such support
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
* Estimated GFR \<45 mL/min/1.73 m²
* Moderate-severe chronic lung disease with significant functional limitation, or severe pulmonary hypertension
* Active infection/sepsis or active infective endocarditis
* Severe hepatic dysfunction, major coagulopathy, or bleeding diathesis
* Pregnancy
* Deep hypothermia protocols (\<28 °C)
* Procedures without ACC
* Preoperative cardiac troponin above the laboratory upper reference limit
* Any condition that, in the judgment of the treating team, would preclude safe participation or protocol adherence
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Muhammet Talha Ceran, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammet Talha Ceran, MD
Cardiovascular Surgery Resident, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yüksel Dereli, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Necmettin Erbakan University, Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery
Muhammet Talha Ceran
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Necmettin Erbakan University, Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine
Konya, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Januzzi JL Jr. Troponin testing after cardiac surgery. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2009;1(3):22-32.
Eris C, Engin M, Erdolu B, Kagan As A. Comparison of del Nido Cardioplegia vs. blood cardioplegia in adult aortic surgery: Is the single-dose cardioplegia technique really advantageous? Asian J Surg. 2022 May;45(5):1122-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
Devereaux PJ, Lamy A, Chan MTV, Allard RV, Lomivorotov VV, Landoni G, Zheng H, Paparella D, McGillion MH, Belley-Cote EP, Parlow JL, Underwood MJ, Wang CY, Dvirnik N, Abubakirov M, Fominskiy E, Choi S, Fremes S, Monaco F, Urrutia G, Maestre M, Hajjar LA, Hillis GS, Mills NL, Margari V, Mills JD, Billing JS, Methangkool E, Polanczyk CA, Sant'Anna R, Shukevich D, Conen D, Kavsak PA, McQueen MJ, Brady K, Spence J, Le Manach Y, Mian R, Lee SF, Bangdiwala SI, Hussain S, Borges FK, Pettit S, Vincent J, Guyatt GH, Yusuf S, Alpert JS, White HD, Whitlock RP; VISION Cardiac Surgery Investigators. High-Sensitivity Troponin I after Cardiac Surgery and 30-Day Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 3;386(9):827-836. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000803.
Behrendt T. Scanning densitometer for photographic fundus measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Oct;62(4):689-93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)92195-7. No abstract available.
McGrath S, Alaour B, Kampourakis T, Marber M. Cardiac Troponin: Fragments of the Future? JACC Adv. 2025 May;4(5):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101695. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
Nakao M, Morita K, Shinohara G, Kunihara T. Modified Del Nido Cardioplegia and Its Evaluation in a Piglet Model. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Spring;33(1):84-92. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 May 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-40209705-050.01-1123786
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.