Intraocular Pressure in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

NCT ID: NCT06494969

Last Updated: 2024-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-01-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study to compare the effects of sevoflurane-based anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) during coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

The primary endpoint was to examine the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based anesthesia methods on IOP during CABG operation. Secondary endpoints included a comparison of hemodynamic variables, blood gas values, intensive care, and hospital stay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were included in this prospective observational study. Patients with a history of cardiac surgery, diabetic retinopathy, cataract, uncontrolled hypertension, chronic kidney disease, glaucoma, previous eye surgery, previous neurological disease, allergy to propofol or sevoflurane, and a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 30 mmHg were excluded from the study. The primary endpoint was to examine the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based anesthesia methods on IOP during CABG operation. Secondary endpoints included a comparison of hemodynamic variables, blood gas values, intensive care, and hospital stay.

Intraoperative anesthesia management was standardized for both techniques, and the attending anesthesiologist was asked to comply with the protocols determined within the scope of this standardization. However, the choice between sevoflurane-based anesthesia or propofol-based TIVA was left to the discretion of the attending cardiac anesthesiologists. In the operating theatre, patients were monitored with a 5-lead electrocardiography, invasive arterial blood pressure via radial artery catheterization, pulse oximetry, and rectal temperature. Initial vital signs and blood gas values were recorded. No premedication was given before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia induction was performed in all patients with intravenous administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam, 5-10 mcg/kg fentanyl, 0.5-2 mg/kg propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. An endotracheal tube with an internal diameter of 8-8.5 mm was used for male patients and an endotracheal tube with an internal diameter of 7-7.75 mm for female patients. Mechanical ventilation was performed using a Drager Perseus anesthesia workstation under volume-controlled mode, with fractional inspired oxygen tension (Fio2) set at 0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 4-5 cmH2O, tidal volume at 6-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight, and respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) between 35-45 mmHg. A central venous catheter was inserted into all patients using the right internal jugular vein after induction, and a Foley catheter was inserted for urine monitoring. Depth of anesthesia was monitored in all patients using Patient State Index (PSI) values (Masimo®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA), and PSI values were maintained between 25-50 throughout the surgery in all patients. Rocuronium was administered as 0.1-0.2 mg/kg IV intermittent bolus doses for muscle relaxation.

According to the choice of anesthesia type, the patients were divided into two groups: those using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (Group P) and those using sevoflurane-based anesthesia (Group S). In Group P, anesthesia was maintained with an infusion of 3-10 mg/kg/h IV propofol. In Group S, anesthesia maintenance was provided with 1-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. In both groups, fentanyl was administered if the increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was greater than 20% from the baseline but not less than 65 mmHg. During CPB in Group S, sevoflurane was delivered to the oxygenator circuit via a calibrated vaporizer (Blease®, Blease Medical Equipment, Ltd, Chesham, UK), and the MAC value was measured at the oxygenator output of the CPB circuit. Extracorporeal circulation was provided with a CPB device (Stockert®, Sorin Group, Munchen, Germany) and an oxygenator (Sechrist®, Sechrist Int, Anaheim, CA, USA). Before CPB, 300-400 U/kg heparin was administered to achieve an Activated Coagulation Time (ACT) of 480 s. During CPB, non-pulsatile flow with a target flow rate of 2.2-2.5 l/min/m2 was applied, and body temperature was maintained between 32-34°C. Hematocrit values were maintained between at least 20-25%, and mean arterial pressure at 50-80 mmHg. Myocardial protection was maintained with intermittent antegrade and sometimes retrograde blood cardioplegia. Before weaning from CPB, patients were warmed to 36-37°C, and heparin was neutralized with 1 mg IV protamine sulfate per 100 U. All patients were transferred to the cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit (ICU) without extubation after the operation.

Intraocular pressures were measured at eight predefined time points using the ICARE Tonometer (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) by a single ophthalmologist blinded to group allocation (Table 1). Three consecutive measurements were taken from each eye at each time point, and the average value of IOP for each eye was recorded.

Arterial blood gas values (pH, PO2, PCO2, lactate, and hematocrit) were recorded at three different time points: Before induction, during CPB (after cross-clamping), and at the end of the surgery. In addition, hemodynamic variables (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, heart rate, and SpO2 values) were recorded at the same time points as IOP measurements. The length of hospital stay and ICU stay of the patients were also recorded.

I n conclusion intraocular pressures were similar for both groups at all time points. A statistically significant decrease was found in intraocular pressures in all measurements after induction compared to pre-induction values in both Group P and Group S (p \< 0.05). Compared to IOP measured at 10 minutes after induction, no statistically significant difference was found at all subsequent time points in both groups. When the right and left intraocular pressures were compared, no statistically significant difference was detected at all time points in both Group P and Group S.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intraocular Pressure Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group P

Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia

Intraocular pressure measurement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraocular pressures were measured and recorded at 8 predefined time points using a tonometer; before anesthesia induction (T1), 10 min after induction (T2), immediately before the beginning of CPB (T3), 3 minute after the beginning of CPB (T4), 3 minute after cross-clamping (T5), 3min after cross-clamp removal (T6), immediately before the weaning of CPB (T7), and end of the surgery (immediately after skin closure) (T8).

Group S

Sevoflurane-based anesthesia

Intraocular pressure measurement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraocular pressures were measured and recorded at 8 predefined time points using a tonometer; before anesthesia induction (T1), 10 min after induction (T2), immediately before the beginning of CPB (T3), 3 minute after the beginning of CPB (T4), 3 minute after cross-clamping (T5), 3min after cross-clamp removal (T6), immediately before the weaning of CPB (T7), and end of the surgery (immediately after skin closure) (T8).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraocular pressure measurement

Intraocular pressures were measured and recorded at 8 predefined time points using a tonometer; before anesthesia induction (T1), 10 min after induction (T2), immediately before the beginning of CPB (T3), 3 minute after the beginning of CPB (T4), 3 minute after cross-clamping (T5), 3min after cross-clamp removal (T6), immediately before the weaning of CPB (T7), and end of the surgery (immediately after skin closure) (T8).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)

Exclusion Criteria

* history of cardiac surgery
* diabetic retinopathy
* cataract
* uncontrolled hypertension
* chronic kidney disease
* glaucoma
* previous eye surgery
* previous neurological disease
* allergy to propofol or sevoflurane
* baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 30 mmHg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Antalya Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ali Sait Kavaklı

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Health Science University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Antalya, Muratpasa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Yasemin1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.