Effects of Topical Lidocaine and Benzocaine on Pain Level and Injection Satisfaction

NCT ID: NCT07242157

Last Updated: 2025-12-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical lidocaine and benzocaine in reducing pain and improving injection satisfaction during Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) catheterization among hemodialysis patients.

Design:A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 hemodialysis patients who met the inclusion criteria.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned into three groups: Lidocaine Spray (n=20), Benzocaine Spray (n=20), and Placebo (n=20). Pain intensity and injection satisfaction were measured immediately after catheterization using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Injection Satisfaction Scale (ISS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All individuals included in the study were provided with private health insurance to cover any potential adverse events resulting from the procedure. The participants were informed about the study both verbally and in writing, and written informed consent forms were obtained from them. Individuals who met the inclusion criteria and signed the informed consent form were assigned to study groups according to a computer-generated randomization list based on their file numbers. Accordingly, the first group was designated as the Lidocaine Spray group (Experiment I), the second group as the Benzocaine Spray group (Experiment II), and the third group as the placebo group. The design of the study, including the formation of the groups and the implementation process, is presented in Figure 3.

Two nurses working in the hemodialysis unit volunteered to participate in the study and received training from the researcher regarding the study procedures. To eliminate individual differences, one nurse performed the Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) catheterization, while the other collected the data. These nurses were blinded to the group assignments of the patients they intervened with. In addition, the participants themselves were unaware of the groups to which they were assigned according to computer randomization. The individuals were informed about the Visual Analog Scale and the Injection Satisfaction Evaluation Scale. The nurse responsible for data collection measured and recorded in the Case Report Form the blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation (using a fingertip pulse oximeter) five minutes before and immediately after the procedure. Blood pressure measurements were taken from the arm opposite to the Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) catheterization site using a calibrated digital sphygmomanometer.

Since the Lidocaine Spray and Benzocaine Spray used in the groups had similar-looking bottles, the medications were used in their original containers. For the placebo group, a Lidocaine Spray bottle was emptied, washed, and sterilized in an autoclave. The sterilized glass bottle was then filled with 70% alcohol routinely used in the hospital. Subsequently, the bottles were labeled by the researchers with color-coded bands on their bases: red for the Lidocaine Spray, blue for the Benzocaine Spray, and black for the alcohol (Figure 2). The content of each bottle was identified only by the color band on its base, known exclusively to the researchers.

To prevent errors due to catheter differences, all patients included in the study received AVF catheters. To enhance the reliability of the study and avoid variations in pain levels, the same arterial and venous catheters were used for all AVF procedures. Immediately after AVF catheterization, the patient's blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were measured using a fingertip pulse oximeter, and the pain intensity experienced during the procedure was recorded by the nurse on the Questionnaire Form using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Injection Satisfaction Evaluation Scale (ISES) values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Satisfaction Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

The study population consisted of patients receiving treatment at the hemodialysis unit of a university-affiliated dialysis hospital between the study period (N = 126). Among these, 60 individuals who met the inclusion criteria and were selected using a computer-generated randomization list comprised the study sample. Sample size calculation was performed using pre-analysis data from similar studies in G\*Power 3.1.9.2, assuming a 5% Type I error and 95% power, with a 39.5% difference in pain levels considered. Each study group was determined to include 18 participants
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
During the data collection process, the sample of the study consisted of 60 individuals who met the inclusion criteria and were selected according to a computer-generated randomization list.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group II : Benzocain Sprey

Benzocain Spray was applied to Experiment I group before AVF catheterization application

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Benzocaine spray

Intervention Type DRUG

This study, designed to investigate the effects of lidocaine and benzocaine on reducing pain and increasing injection satisfaction during AVF catheterization, is the first of its kind conducted in Türkiye. It is expected to make a significant contribution to nursing science and provide an effective approach for nurses to reduce catheter-related pain in hemodialysis units. Nurses play a vital role in minimizing procedure-related pain, and it is essential that they possess and apply knowledge about evidence-based, easy-to-use pharmacological methods to achieve this goal.

Group III: Placebo

Alcohol was administered to the placebo group prior to AVF catheterization application.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo group (control arm)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine and benzocaine sprays were provided in identical bottles with color-coded bases to maintain blinding. All participants received AVF catheterization using the same arterial and venous sites to standardize procedure-related pain. Pain (VAS) and injection satisfaction (ISS) scores were recorded immediately after the procedure.

Group 1:Lidocaine spray

Each ml contained 10 mg lidocaine and ethanol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine Spray: Each ml contained 10 mg lidocaine and ethanol. Applied to the local site to provide anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

In this study, a moderate, negative, and significant correlation was found between total pain scores and injection satisfaction scores in the lidocaine and benzocaine groups. Overall, evidence suggests that considering the positive effects of topical lidocaine and benzocaine on pain and satisfaction during invasive procedures represents an important step toward improving patient-centered care and satisfaction. Incorporating these interventions into clinical protocols in hemodialysis units could serve as a comfort-enhancing approach before dialysis procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine Spray: Each ml contained 10 mg lidocaine and ethanol. Applied to the local site to provide anesthesia

In this study, a moderate, negative, and significant correlation was found between total pain scores and injection satisfaction scores in the lidocaine and benzocaine groups. Overall, evidence suggests that considering the positive effects of topical lidocaine and benzocaine on pain and satisfaction during invasive procedures represents an important step toward improving patient-centered care and satisfaction. Incorporating these interventions into clinical protocols in hemodialysis units could serve as a comfort-enhancing approach before dialysis procedures.

Intervention Type DRUG

Benzocaine spray

This study, designed to investigate the effects of lidocaine and benzocaine on reducing pain and increasing injection satisfaction during AVF catheterization, is the first of its kind conducted in Türkiye. It is expected to make a significant contribution to nursing science and provide an effective approach for nurses to reduce catheter-related pain in hemodialysis units. Nurses play a vital role in minimizing procedure-related pain, and it is essential that they possess and apply knowledge about evidence-based, easy-to-use pharmacological methods to achieve this goal.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo group (control arm)

Lidocaine and benzocaine sprays were provided in identical bottles with color-coded bases to maintain blinding. All participants received AVF catheterization using the same arterial and venous sites to standardize procedure-related pain. Pain (VAS) and injection satisfaction (ISS) scores were recorded immediately after the procedure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged ≥18 years,
* non-pregnant, not planning pregnancy,
* receiving hemodialysis three times weekly for at least three months,
* continuously treated at the same institution without any change in treatment regimen,
* without pain in any part of the body affecting study outcomes,
* with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of zero at baseline,
* no analgesics within 24 hours prior,
* a baseline Algometer pressure pain threshold of 8-16 lbs.
* participants were required to understand Turkish,
* communicate effectively,
* volunteer for the study, and
* provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals with neurological disorders such as epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or multiple sclerosis,
* unable or unwilling to comply with study protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TC Erciyes University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sevil Şahin

Assoc Prof Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erciyes Universty

Kayseri, Talas, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/686

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Topical Radial Artery Vasodilation
NCT01155167 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3