Exploring the Effectiveness of Incorporated Versus Additional Dual-Task Training Program in Community Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT07238218

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compared the effects of IDT and ADT on cognitive function, physical performance, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Incorporated Dual-task Training Additional Dual-task Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The motor training component

The motor training component included stretching, aerobic exercise, strength training, and balance exercises. Exercise intensity was gradually increased to a moderate level (50-70% of participants' maximum heart rate) using low-impact modalities to minimize injury risk and was adjusted according to individual physical condition throughout the intervention. Warm-up and cool-down periods involved whole-body muscle stretching. Aerobic exercises consisted of walking, marching in place, high knee lifts, kicking motions, leg curls, touchdown steps, and box steps, combining upper and lower limb movements to produce rhythmic and repetitive patterns. Strength training comprised squats, lunges, chair sit-to-stands, weightlifting using water-filled bottles, farmer's walks, and elastic band exercises targeting both upper and lower limbs. Balance exercises included single-leg stands, heel-to-toe walking, ball kicking, and cross-stepping.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

the additional dual-task training group (ADT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

the cognitive task was performed concurrently but independently from the motor task, functioning as a distractor rather than a necessary prerequisite for task completion. Examples included performing lower limb strength exercises while solving arithmetic problems or reciting memorized items while stepping.

the incorporated dual-task training group (IDT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

the cognitive task was integrated within the motor task and was essential for successful completion of the combined motor-cognitive activity. Examples included memorizing and executing movement sequences akin to dancing or completing ladder stepping patterns in a predetermined order.

The cognitive training

The cognitive training targeted domains such as attention, language, memory, calculation, and processing speed. Each session incorporated one or more cognitive domains. Attention tasks involved responding to visual or auditory cues, spotting differences in quantity, size, color, direction, or shape, and identifying specific objects within cluttered environments. Language tasks included naming fruits, animals, and vegetables, playing word solitaire, engaging in word association, constructing sentences, spelling, reading, and picture-based storytelling. Calculation tasks required solving arithmetic problems or calculating shopping list costs. Processing speed activities involved timely responses to questions, such as number comparisons. Memory tasks focused on recalling numbers, symbols, words, or daily items after presentation, as well as remembering spatial locations, shopping lists, or informational content from brochures and images.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

the additional dual-task training group (ADT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

the cognitive task was performed concurrently but independently from the motor task, functioning as a distractor rather than a necessary prerequisite for task completion. Examples included performing lower limb strength exercises while solving arithmetic problems or reciting memorized items while stepping.

the incorporated dual-task training group (IDT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

the cognitive task was integrated within the motor task and was essential for successful completion of the combined motor-cognitive activity. Examples included memorizing and executing movement sequences akin to dancing or completing ladder stepping patterns in a predetermined order.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the additional dual-task training group (ADT)

the cognitive task was performed concurrently but independently from the motor task, functioning as a distractor rather than a necessary prerequisite for task completion. Examples included performing lower limb strength exercises while solving arithmetic problems or reciting memorized items while stepping.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

the incorporated dual-task training group (IDT)

the cognitive task was integrated within the motor task and was essential for successful completion of the combined motor-cognitive activity. Examples included memorizing and executing movement sequences akin to dancing or completing ladder stepping patterns in a predetermined order.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 60 years
* Able to follow instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 20)
* Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \> 20
* No difficulty performing basic activities of daily living
* No diagnosis of dementia confirmed by a neurologist

Exclusion Criteria

* Self-reported diagnosis of neurological disorders
* Unstable medical conditions (e.g., recent myocardial infarction, heart failure, recent heart surgery, or severe asthma)
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cheng Kung University Governance Framework for Human Research Ethics

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ching-yi Wu

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ching-yi Wu

Distinguished Professor and Associate Dean of College of Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ching-yi Wu, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chang Gung Memotial Hospital

Taoyuan, Guishan Dist, Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

109-036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.