Anesthesia Management in Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke - 2
NCT ID: NCT07235514
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
958 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-01
2029-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question it aims to answer is:
• Is general anesthesia (GA) better than procedural sedation (PS) for improving functional performance and decrease dependance in daily life 3 months after stroke?
GA (a non-arousable state induced by anesthetic medications that require respiratory assistance) or PS (a state of reduced arousal induced by lesser dose of anesthetic medications that do not require respiratory assistance) are both used for MT. GA enables strict immobility that could facilitate the conduct of MT but lessen blood pressure and blood flow in the brain. PS provides less drop in blood pressure but MT could be more difficult due to possible movement and breathing may be decreased.
Researchers will compare GA with PS to see which one is better for MT success and for the functional consequences of stroke.
Participants will be treated with GA or PS for the intervention of MT and will be followed by researchers during their hospital stay and asked by a telephone interview how is their functional status 3 months after stroke.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anesthesia Management in Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
NCT03229148
GA vs. CS for Endovascular Stroke Therapy
NCT03247998
"GOLIATH" - General Or Local Anaestesia in Intra Arterial THerapy
NCT02317237
CO2 Modulation in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT05051397
Risk Factors of Conversion From Local to General Sedation in Endovascular Stroke Therapy
NCT02895776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Three European single-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no difference between GA and PS for their respective primary endpoints. These three trials were pooled in an individual patient data meta-analysis that evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale mRS) at 3 months as the primary endpoint. 368 patients were included, and GA was associated with a better functional outcome (mean mRS score was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.5-3.1) in the GA group vs. 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0-3.5) in the PS group (difference, 0.43 \[95% CI, 0.03-0.83\])). The main limitations of this trial were 1) the small sample size (3 small single-center trials), 2/ a possible center effect with over-representation of one trial on the primary endpoint, and 3/ a highly selected population (exclusion of less severe patients (NIHSS\<10), stroke presentation \> 8 hours and wake up stroke).
Two French multicenter RCTs have recently been published. The GASS trial included 345 patients in four centers with dedicated GA and PS protocols. There was no difference in the primary endpoint, which was functional independence (mRS 0 to 2) at three months (36% for PS vs. 38% for GA (RR, 0.91 \[95% CI, 0.69 to 1.19\], p = 0.47)). The AMETIS trial included 273 patients in 10 centers with no specified GA or PS protocol. There was no difference in the primary endpoint, which was a composite of functional independence at 3 months and absence of any peri-procedural and medical complications during the first 7 days. The median mRS was 3 (2-5) under GA vs. 3 (2-4) under PS; RR 0.80 \[95% CI: 0.53 to 1.22\]. GA was strongly associated with the occurrence of arterial hypotension (87.4% vs. 44.9% in the PS group).
However, 1) these multicenter trials had relatively small sample sizes, 2) the time of assessment of the primary outcome measure was highly variable in GASS, and 3) in AMETIS, the BP targets in the GA group were not met and there was heterogeneity in drug management under PS and GA.
These contradictory results reveal a persistent clinical equipoise regarding this important issue.
The AMETIS-2 trial will evaluate almost every patient with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke eligible for MT in different French comprehensive stroke centers.
The trial protocol for PS and GA will use dedicated anesthetic and hemodynamic management protocols.
The primary outcome measure will use an ordinal shift analysis of the mRS score evaluated at 3 months as the primary endpoint.
To extend the effect analysis, functional independence, cognitive and quality of life assessment will be evaluated as secondary endpoints at 3 months.
We therefore hypothesize that, with a dedicated anesthetic protocol and strict hemodynamic control, GA will lead to a better long-term functional outcome after stroke.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
General anesthesia
General anesthesia with intubation and mechanical ventilation:
ECG, SpO2 and BP. BP will be measured every 2 minutes Hyperglycemia (\>180mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (\<60mg/dL) should be treated (outside of the protocol)
Systolic BP: 150 - 180mmHg with Diastolic BP \< 105mmHg Norepinephrine tartrate infusion or Nicardipine on a peripheral intravenous line or on a 3-way venous extender, as necessary EtCO2 35 - 45mmHg SpO2 above 94 %. Glycemia as needed
End of procedure: Anesthesia will be immediately stopped and extubation should not be delayed. After the intervention, patients are transferred to the post anesthesia care unit and are then admitted to the stroke unit
First 24 hours: SBP\<180mmHg, DBP\<110mmHg and MAP\>65mmHg, SpO2 \> 94 %, temperature \< 38°C, blood glucose 60 - 180mg/dL. Other aspects of monitoring are not modified by the protocol.
24-48h outside of the protocol: non-contrast brain CT or a brain MRI
General Anesthesia
In the general anesthesia (GA) group with tracheal intubation : Clinical target: unarousable state Standard preoxygenation, • Rapid sequence induction of GA will use intravenous Etomidate (0.2-0.3mg/Kg) or Ketamine (1-2mg/Kg) and Succinylcholine (1mg/Kg) or Rocuronium (1.2 mg/Kg) • Maintenance of GA will use intravenous Propofol (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 4.0 µg/mL or up to 5.0 mg/kg/hr) or Sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration up to 2% (EtSevo)) and intravenous Remifentanil (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 4.0 ng/mL) Movement despite unarousable state: NMBA as needed
Procedural sedation
Procedural sedation with spontaneous ventilation:
ECG, SpO2 and BP. BP will be measured every 2 minutes Hyperglycemia (\>180mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (\<60mg/dL) should be treated (outside of the protocol)
Systolic BP: 150 - 180mmHg with Diastolic BP \< 105mmHg Norepinephrine tartrate infusion or Nicardipine on a peripheral intravenous line or on a 3-way venous extender, as necessary Breathing face mask: EtCO2 and oxygen as necessary SpO2 above 94 %. Glycemia as needed
End of procedure: Procedural sedation will be immediately stopped. After the intervention, patients are transferred to the post anesthesia care unit and are then admitted to the stroke unit
First 24 hours: SBP\<180mmHg, DBP\<110mmHg and MAP\>65mmHg, SpO2 \> 94 %, temperature \< 38°C, blood glucose 60 - 180mg/dL. Other aspects of monitoring are not modified by the protocol.
24-48h outside of the protocol: non-contrast brain CT or a brain MRI
Procedural sedation
In the procedural sedation group with spontaneous ventilation :
Clinical target: alert and "confortable" i.e. minimal to moderate sedation level
* Subcutaneous local anesthesia with Lidocaine 10mg/mL (maximum 10mL)
* Intravenous Remifentanil as necessary to achieve the sedation clinical target (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 2.0 ng/mL). Propofol could be added as necessary (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 3.0 µg/mL or 2.0 mg/kg/hr).
The lightest sedation level allowing the intervention has to be sought.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
General Anesthesia
In the general anesthesia (GA) group with tracheal intubation : Clinical target: unarousable state Standard preoxygenation, • Rapid sequence induction of GA will use intravenous Etomidate (0.2-0.3mg/Kg) or Ketamine (1-2mg/Kg) and Succinylcholine (1mg/Kg) or Rocuronium (1.2 mg/Kg) • Maintenance of GA will use intravenous Propofol (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 4.0 µg/mL or up to 5.0 mg/kg/hr) or Sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration up to 2% (EtSevo)) and intravenous Remifentanil (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 4.0 ng/mL) Movement despite unarousable state: NMBA as needed
Procedural sedation
In the procedural sedation group with spontaneous ventilation :
Clinical target: alert and "confortable" i.e. minimal to moderate sedation level
* Subcutaneous local anesthesia with Lidocaine 10mg/mL (maximum 10mL)
* Intravenous Remifentanil as necessary to achieve the sedation clinical target (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 2.0 ng/mL). Propofol could be added as necessary (brain tissue target controlled infusion up to 3.0 µg/mL or 2.0 mg/kg/hr).
The lightest sedation level allowing the intervention has to be sought.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute ischemic stroke with an occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery and/or the proximal middle cerebral artery (M1-M2) with or without association of extracranial occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (tandem lesion)
* Eligible for mechanical thrombectomy according to international guidelines
* Informed and signed consent of patient, or if he is unable to consent the consent of patient's relative or emergency procedure in the absence of relative
* National health insurance
Exclusion Criteria
* Premorbid disability defined as a mRS \> 2
* Posterior circulation stroke
* Associated cerebral hemorrhage
* Stroke complicating another acute illness or postoperative stroke
* Emesis at arrival in angiosuite
* Allergy to anesthetic medication
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Adult under the protection of the law
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
PHRC, Ministry of Health France
UNKNOWN
STROKELINK
UNKNOWN
ANARLF Network
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Russell CHABANNE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schonenberger S, Henden PL, Simonsen CZ, Uhlmann L, Klose C, Pfaff JAR, Yoo AJ, Sorensen LH, Ringleb PA, Wick W, Kieser M, Mohlenbruch MA, Rasmussen M, Rentzos A, Bosel J. Association of General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation With Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1283-1293. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11455.
Chabanne R, Geeraerts T, Begard M, Balanca B, Rapido F, Degos V, Tavernier B, Molliex S, Velly L, Verdonk F, Lukaszewicz AC, Perrigault PF, Albucher JF, Cognard C, Guyot A, Fernandez C, Masgrau A, Moreno R, Ferrier A, Jaber S, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Futier E; ANARLF NetworkAMETIS Study Group. Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy With Procedural Sedation vs General Anesthesia in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AMETIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2023 May 1;80(5):474-483. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0413.
Maurice A, Eugene F, Ronziere T, Devys JM, Taylor G, Subileau A, Huet O, Gherbi H, Laffon M, Esvan M, Laviolle B, Beloeil H; GASS (General Anesthesia versus Sedation for Acute Stroke Treatment) Study Group and the French Society of Anesthesiologists (SFAR) Research Network. General Anesthesia versus Sedation, Both with Hemodynamic Control, during Intraarterial Treatment for Stroke: The GASS Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. 2022 Apr 1;136(4):567-576. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004142.
Quintard H, Degos V, Mazighi M, Berge J, Boussemart P, Chabanne R, Figueiredo S, Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Meuret L, Olivot JM, Pottecher J, Rapido F, Richard S, Saleme S, Siguret-Depasse V, Naggara O, De Courson H, Garnier M. Anaesthetic and peri-operative management for thrombectomy procedures in stroke patients. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Feb;42(1):101188. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101188. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, Khatri P, Lobotesis K, Mazighi M, Schellinger PD, Toni D, de Vries J, White P, Fiehler J. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/2396987319832140. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA. Response by Powers and Rabinstein to Letter Regarding Article, "2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association". Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):e277-e278. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026917. Epub 2019 Aug 8. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-A00169-40
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PHRC 2024 CHABANNE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.