DCB vs. DES in Young STEMI Patients: The DCB-STEMI Trial
NCT ID: NCT07229248
Last Updated: 2025-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
496 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-05
2027-12-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Design: This single-center Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) compares paclitaxel-coated DCB (3.0 µg/mm², 30s inflation) vs. Drug eluting stents (DES) in young STEMI patients (\<50 yrs) undergoing primary PCI. The primary endpoint is 1-year vessel oriented cardiac events (VOCE)= Cardiovascular /all-cause death, target vessel MI, or Target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints include vessel-oriented CV events, bleeding, TIMI III flow, residual stenosis, abrupt closure, and bailout stenting. An intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy (100 DCB pts) will evaluate remodeling and late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months.
Methods: 496 patients (248/arm) will be randomized 1:1, powered for non-inferiority (margin 4.5%) assuming VOCE 8.5% (DES) vs. 6.25% (DCB), 80% power, and 5% dropout. Inclusion: age 18-50, STEMI. Exclusion: End stage renal disease (ESRD), severe multivessel disease, complex lesions, or high thrombus burden. All will receive ticagrelor 90 mg BID for 1 month. A pilot of 50 pts will first assess safety (abrupt closure, lesion prep).
Analysis: Intention-to-treat (ITT) will be primary; modified ITT for secondary endpoints. Statistics include chi-square/Fisher for categorical, t-test/Wilcoxon for continuous, and Kaplan-Meier/Cox for survival. Oversight by data safety monitoring board (DSMB) and Events adjudication Committee (EAC).
Significance: This trial leverages NICVD's high PCI volume to test DCB as an alternative to DES in young STEMI patients. By avoiding permanent implants, DCB may reduce long-term complications and DAPT needs. The IVUS substudy and pilot phase strengthen rigor. If non-inferiority is proven, DCB could reshape STEMI management in South Asia and similar high-burden regions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT02219802
DCB Under the Guidance of OCT in STEMI
NCT05680051
Acute Balloon Angioplasty vs. Traditional Early Invasive Treatment of Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT00493584
Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography Guided Drug-coated Balloon Treatment for STEMI Patients:a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04475978
Drug-eluting Balloon in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT00856765
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In young patients (\<50 years), lifetime management after stenting carries unique economic and social consequences. Stent implantation means a lifelong risk of ISR, stent thrombosis, and strict adherence to DAPT-a major compliance and financial issue in this age group.
These limitations have led to the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB), which deliver antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall without leaving a permanent implant. This "leave nothing behind" strategy is particularly attractive in young patients and those with high bleeding risk. DCBs have shown promise in ISR, small vessel disease, and STEMI. Paclitaxel-coated balloons are most commonly used, delivering 2.0-3.5 µg/mm² of paclitaxel with cytotoxicity lasting at least 14 days. With a 30-second balloon inflation, about 16% of the drug is transferred to the vessel wall, ensuring homogenous delivery while avoiding permanent implants, stent thrombosis, ISR, and prolonged DAPT.
Several studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated comparable outcomes between DCBs and DES in AMI, including STEMI. In a large multicenter analysis of STEMI patients, DCBs were associated with similar mortality and target lesion revascularization compared to DES. Other feasibility studies confirmed no excess risk of abrupt closure, thrombosis, or target vessel failure when DCBs were used in primary PCI.
Cardiovascular disease, especially AMI, remains the leading global cause of death. South Asia bears a particularly high burden, with Pakistan at the top for premature MI. The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, has become the world's largest primary PCI center, performing 17,761 primary PCIs in 2022. Notably, 45% were in young patients (\<50 years) and 12% in very young (\<40 years). This provides a unique opportunity to study DCB vs DES in a high-volume RCT focused on young STEMI patients.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized controlled trial comparing DCB vs DES in young (\<50 years) STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Hypothesis: DCB is non-inferior to DES in reducing Vessel Oriented Composite Endpoint (VOCE) at one year.
Primary Objective: Compare 1-year VOCE between DCB and DES in young STEMI patients.
Secondary Objectives: Compare vessel-oriented CV events, target vessel failure, vessel-related MI, stent thrombosis, bleeding, TIMI III flow, residual stenosis, abrupt closure, and bailout stenting.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ METHODS
* Design: Single-center RCT at NICVD Karachi.
* Duration: 12 months.
* Randomization: Block randomization (1:1) using sealed envelopes.
* Sample Size: 496 patients (248 per arm). Based on non-inferiority design, assuming VOCE 8.5% with DES and 6.25% with DCB, non-inferiority margin 4.5%, 80% power, 5% dropout.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 18-50 years
* STEMI as first coronary artery disease (CAD) presentation
* Primary PCI within 8 hours of ischemia
* Low SYNTAX score
* Killip class I-II
Exclusion Criteria:
* ESRD
* Severe 3-vessel disease or high SYNTAX score
* Complex lesions \>B or large thrombus despite preparation
* Refusal of consent
* Killip III/IV
* Major bleeding history
INTERVENTIONS
* DCB Arm: Paclitaxel-coated balloon (3.0 µg/mm²), inflated for 30 seconds after adequate lesion preparation. Successful result defined as TIMI III flow, ≤30% residual stenosis, and absence of major dissection. Bailout stenting permitted if needed, but patient analyzed in DCB arm (intention-to-treat).
* DES Arm: Standard second-generation drug eluting stent with routine lesion preparation.
IVUS Substudy:
100 patients in the DCB arm will undergo IVUS at baseline, post-procedure, and 6 months to assess vessel remodeling and late lumen loss.
DAPT Protocol:
Ticagrelor 90 mg BID for 1 month post-PCI, followed by DAPT up to 1 year.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ DATA COLLECTION \& FOLLOW-UP
* Baseline demographics, risk factors, and angiographic data recorded.
* Clinical follow-up at 14 days, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months via visit/phone.
* Events tracked: death, MI, stent thrombosis, bleeding, stroke, repeat PCI, CABG, arrhythmias, and adverse drug reactions.
* Data captured on CRFs and stored securely.
ENDPOINTS
Primary Endpoint:
• 1-year VOCE (all-cause mortality, target vessel MI, TLR).
Secondary Endpoints:
* TIMI III flow rates
* Residual stenosis (\>30% in DCB, \>20% in DES)
* Bailout stenting
* Vessel-oriented events
* Bleeding
QUALITY CONTROL \& ETHICS
* Ethics approval obtained from NICVD.
* Written informed consent (English/Urdu).
* Independent DSMB to monitor safety and review pilot data weekly.
* Event Adjudication Committee to validate endpoints.
* Data stored per GCP for 10 years.
* Medtronic to provide financial support but with no role in design, conduct, or analysis.
PILOT PHASE An initial pilot of 50 patients will assess safety of the DCB-only strategy in STEMI. Focus will be on lesion preparation, abrupt closure, and bailout stenting. If safe, full enrollment will proceed.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
* Population: Intention-to-treat for efficacy; modified ITT for safety.
* Categorical Variables: Chi-square or Fisher's exact.
* Continuous Variables: T-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum.
* Time-to-Event: Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test; Cox regression for hazard ratios and subgroup analysis.
* Significance: p\<0.05.
* Subgroups: Age (\<40 vs ≥40), sex, smoking, diabetes, renal function, weight.
SIGNIFICANCE This trial addresses a critical gap in managing young STEMI patients in South Asia, a population with extremely high disease burden and unique socioeconomic challenges. If non-inferiority of DCB is confirmed, it could reshape PCI practice by reducing long-term stent-related complications, improving compliance, and lowering financial strain in younger patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DCB arm (Prevail Drug Coated Balloon)
Patients assigned to drug coated balloon
Drug coated balloon (Prevail; Medtronic Inc.)
Drug coated balloon (Prevail DCB, Medtronic Inc.)
DES arm (Limus drug eluting stent)
Patients receiving standard of care Drug eluting stent
Drug eluting stent
standard of care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Drug coated balloon (Prevail; Medtronic Inc.)
Drug coated balloon (Prevail DCB, Medtronic Inc.)
Drug eluting stent
standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient of age between 18 to 50 years
* Patients with STEMI ( as first presentation of CAD) undergoing Primary PCI
* Total ischemic Time less than 8 hrs.
* Low syntax score
* Stable (Killip I-II)
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe 3 VD; Intermediate of High syntax score
* Lesion type\>B
18 Years
49 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pakistan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor Abdul Hakeem
Professor and Program Director, Interventional Cardiology, Director Cardiac Catheterization Labs
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abdul Hakeem, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NICVD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
Karachi, , Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mangner N, Farah A, Ohlow MA, Mobius-Winkler S, Weilenmann D, Wohrle J, Linke A, Stachel G, Markovic S, Leibundgut G, Rickenbacher P, Cattaneo M, Gilgen N, Kaiser C, Scheller B, Jeger RV; BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators. Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Prespecified Analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011325. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
Huang KN, Grandi SM, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Late and very late stent thrombosis in patients with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Nov;29(11):1488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
McKavanagh P, Zawadowski G, Ahmed N, Kutryk M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Mar;16(3):219-228. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1435274. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NICVD IRB-32/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.