The Effect of a Cold Air Eucapnic Hyperventilation Test on Lower Respiratory Airways in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Asthma

NCT ID: NCT07220928

Last Updated: 2025-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-04

Study Completion Date

2024-11-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, we want to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CAEH test in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma. We want to develop a CAEH test to differentiate patients with different types of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction from healthy volunteers and to evaluate whether the respiratory phenotype induced by cold air inhalation differs between subjects with asthma and healthy subjects. Furthermore, we want to evaluate whether the CAEH test is more robust over time compared to the EVH test. Previously, our lab has demonstrated that submaximal exercise at subfreezing temperatures in a climate chamber (-5°C) induces an acute respiratory response in patients with asthma and in healthy subjects who have been exposed to high PM10 (unpublished data). Finally, This study will serve as a preliminary study for a subsequent prospective study in which the results and optimized protocol obtained in this study will be used to further evaluate the feasibility of using this CAEH as a diagnostic tool in asthma compared to EIB (CLARINET2). The present study is required to develop a standardized CAEH test in a safe and feasible manner. This study will also help to identify appropriate endpoints (FEV1, multiple breath washout test, biomarkers…) of the subsequent studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, we aim to develop a safe and feasible cold air (-15°C) eucapnic hyperventilation (CAEH) test protocol in which we can compare the lower airway responses between healthy volunteers and subjects with asthma. Consequently, we want to evaluate the effect of cold air inhalation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms, airway integrity, and local and systemic inflammation.

Primary endpoints

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare proportional change in FEV1, (% decrease) after a CAEH test in healthy volunteers and patients with mild to moderate asthma. Post-exposure will be calculated as a time-weighted average over the 30 min after the CAEH test. At each time point (pre-, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes post-exposure), FEV1 will be measured in triplicate.

Secondary endpoints

We want to evaluate whether and to what extent the inhalation of cold air during this CAEH test can induce changes in respiratory symptoms (including dyspnea, cough, mucus production, etc.), affects lower airway integrity (airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC), small airway dysfunction (FEF 25/75, lung ventilation inhomogeneity (LCI), bronchial hyperreactivity (PC20 AMP)) and whether it induces (local or systemic) inflammation (different biomarkers in sputum and blood, as defined in section 5.2).

These changes will be compared between healthy volunteers and predisposed subjects with mild to moderate asthma. The abovementioned responses and the proportional change in FEV1 after the CAEH test will be compared to a standard (21°C room air) eucapnic hyperventilation (EVH) test. Furthermore, we will compare the results obtained in this study to the results obtained in the ALASCAIR study of dr. Tatjana Decaesteker. Finally, the effects of the CAEH will be correlated to the amount of air pollution the subject was exposed to, in the days prior to the test (as this may have an effect on the responses to cold air inhalation in healthy volunteers, as found in the Alascair study (unpublished data)), by means of different questionnaires evaluating life style and exposure to air pollution (SF-36, AQLQ, ACQ, SQUASH,…).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma (Diagnosis)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Healthy volunteers will be compared to patients with astma
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge

Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation

Group Type OTHER

Cold air challenge

Intervention Type DEVICE

This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants

Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge

Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation

Group Type OTHER

Cold air challenge

Intervention Type DEVICE

This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants

Patients with asthma

Patients with asthma will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation

Group Type OTHER

Cold air challenge

Intervention Type DEVICE

This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cold air challenge

This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cold air hyperventilation test

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years old at time of signing informed consent
* BMI between 18 and 28 kg/cm2
* Ability to give informed consent and to comply with study protocol, in the investigator's judgement
* Non-smoking or ex-smokers for at least 12 months with less than 10 pack years
* Normal spirometry

Group specific:

Histamine positive healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (\< 8 mg/ml) at screening Healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (≥ 8 mg/ml) at screening

Patients with asthma:

* Physician-diagnosed asthma for at least 6 months
* Post-bronchodilator FEV1 of ≥ 80% at screening
* Documented airway reversibility either by means of post-bronchodilator reversibility of ≥ 12.% and ≥ 200 ml or in the previous 6 months or by means of documented airway hyperresponsiveness (histamine PC20 \< 4 mg/ml) at screening
* Asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) ≤ 1.5
* Regular treatment with ICS with or without LABA (unchanged dose for at least 30 days) at a low or medium dose of ICS

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous history of intubation or admission to ICU due to asthma
* Severe asthma exacerbation within one month prior to screening visit
* Treatment with oral or systemic steroids within one month prior to screening visit
* Previous treatment with biologics for asthma
* Other major concurrent pulmonary (such as COPD, cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, bronchiectasis) or cardiovascular disease
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lieven Dupont

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lieven Dupont

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven/UZ Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S66825

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilot of Exercise and Asthma Control
NCT06651385 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA