The Effect of a Cold Air Eucapnic Hyperventilation Test on Lower Respiratory Airways in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Asthma
NCT ID: NCT07220928
Last Updated: 2025-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-04
2024-11-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exercise Challenge in a Cold Chamber
NCT02026492
Effect of Oxygen Supplementation During Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
NCT02108925
Effects of AD on VI in Patients With CF
NCT03655249
Hyperventilation Versus Exercise Testing Sensitivity in Exercise Induced Asthma
NCT03063424
Long-term Activity Coaching in Patients With COPD
NCT04139200
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary endpoints
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare proportional change in FEV1, (% decrease) after a CAEH test in healthy volunteers and patients with mild to moderate asthma. Post-exposure will be calculated as a time-weighted average over the 30 min after the CAEH test. At each time point (pre-, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes post-exposure), FEV1 will be measured in triplicate.
Secondary endpoints
We want to evaluate whether and to what extent the inhalation of cold air during this CAEH test can induce changes in respiratory symptoms (including dyspnea, cough, mucus production, etc.), affects lower airway integrity (airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC), small airway dysfunction (FEF 25/75, lung ventilation inhomogeneity (LCI), bronchial hyperreactivity (PC20 AMP)) and whether it induces (local or systemic) inflammation (different biomarkers in sputum and blood, as defined in section 5.2).
These changes will be compared between healthy volunteers and predisposed subjects with mild to moderate asthma. The abovementioned responses and the proportional change in FEV1 after the CAEH test will be compared to a standard (21°C room air) eucapnic hyperventilation (EVH) test. Furthermore, we will compare the results obtained in this study to the results obtained in the ALASCAIR study of dr. Tatjana Decaesteker. Finally, the effects of the CAEH will be correlated to the amount of air pollution the subject was exposed to, in the days prior to the test (as this may have an effect on the responses to cold air inhalation in healthy volunteers, as found in the Alascair study (unpublished data)), by means of different questionnaires evaluating life style and exposure to air pollution (SF-36, AQLQ, ACQ, SQUASH,…).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge
Healthy volunteers with negative histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation
Cold air challenge
This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants
Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge
Healthy volunteers with positive histamine provocation challenge will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation
Cold air challenge
This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants
Patients with asthma
Patients with asthma will perform the same tests as the other 2 arms. The healthy volunteers are assigned in this group after the histamine provocation challenge. All will perform one hyperventilation challenge at room temperature (EVH) and one with cold air (CACh) with pre- and post-exposure evaluation on FEV1, respiratory symptoms and local and systemic inflammation
Cold air challenge
This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold air challenge
This intervention consists of a standardized cold air eucapnic hyperventilation test using a device that controls temperature, humidity, and ventilation. Airway responses are measured via spirometry and biospecimens (serum and sputum supernatant). It is distinguished from other studies by its prospective design and inclusion of both healthy and asthmatic participants
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI between 18 and 28 kg/cm2
* Ability to give informed consent and to comply with study protocol, in the investigator's judgement
* Non-smoking or ex-smokers for at least 12 months with less than 10 pack years
* Normal spirometry
Group specific:
Histamine positive healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (\< 8 mg/ml) at screening Healthy controls: histamine bronchial challenge test (≥ 8 mg/ml) at screening
Patients with asthma:
* Physician-diagnosed asthma for at least 6 months
* Post-bronchodilator FEV1 of ≥ 80% at screening
* Documented airway reversibility either by means of post-bronchodilator reversibility of ≥ 12.% and ≥ 200 ml or in the previous 6 months or by means of documented airway hyperresponsiveness (histamine PC20 \< 4 mg/ml) at screening
* Asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) ≤ 1.5
* Regular treatment with ICS with or without LABA (unchanged dose for at least 30 days) at a low or medium dose of ICS
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe asthma exacerbation within one month prior to screening visit
* Treatment with oral or systemic steroids within one month prior to screening visit
* Previous treatment with biologics for asthma
* Other major concurrent pulmonary (such as COPD, cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, bronchiectasis) or cardiovascular disease
* Pregnancy
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lieven Dupont
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lieven Dupont
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KU Leuven/UZ Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
Leuven, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S66825
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.