Comparative Study on SNAG From Different Positions Low Back Pain Treatment
NCT ID: NCT07215286
Last Updated: 2025-10-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-15
2026-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To compare the effects of lumbar SNAGs applied in loaded versus unloaded positions on pain, disability, and function in individuals with chronic non-specific LBP.
Methods: A randomized, single-blind, parallel-group clinical trial will recruit 34 participants with chronic LBP. Participants will be allocated to receive SNAGs in either loaded or unloaded positions, combined with a standardized exercise program, for 6 sessions over 1 week. The primary outcome is pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) and lumbar flexion range of motion. Secondary outcomes include disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Outcomes will be measured at baseline and immediately post-treatment. Data will be analyzed using linear mixed models on an intention-to-treat basis.
Conclusion: This trial will determine whether a loaded SNAG application provides superior benefits compared to unloaded SNAG in the treatment of chronic LBP. Findings may guide clinical decision-making and optimize manual therapy application.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) in Low Back Pain Patients
NCT02128607
Effect of Manual Therapy on Obese Individuals With Low Back Pain
NCT06201286
Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus McKenzie Method in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05840666
Effect of Two Different Mobilization Techniques in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT07177040
Effects of a Mulligan Mobilisation in the Lumbar Flexion Range of Asymptomatic Subjects
NCT00678093
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Loaded-SNAG
SNAGs from standing position
Loaded-SNAG
patients will receive SNAGs from standing (Loaded-SNAG), step-stance, or functional position that provokes symptoms. A specialized Mulligan belt was used around the patient's waist and the therapist's hips. The mobilizing force was applied parallel to the facet joint plane (cephalic direction) and over the spinous processes of the respective symptomatic spinal levels. The therapist's hand's ulnar aspect was used over the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved segment for flexion glide. The therapist applies accessory glide to targeted zygapophyseal level while the patient actively performs symptomatic movement (e.g., forward flexion), performing repetitions with the therapist maintaining the glide.
Unloaded-SNAG
patients will receive unloaded SNAG from quadruped position to reduce the axial loading. The therapist applies the equivalent accessory glide at the symptomatic spinal level while the patient performs the symptomatic movement (modified to be non-weight-bearing).
Unloaded-SNAG
SNAG from quadruped position
Loaded-SNAG
patients will receive SNAGs from standing (Loaded-SNAG), step-stance, or functional position that provokes symptoms. A specialized Mulligan belt was used around the patient's waist and the therapist's hips. The mobilizing force was applied parallel to the facet joint plane (cephalic direction) and over the spinous processes of the respective symptomatic spinal levels. The therapist's hand's ulnar aspect was used over the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved segment for flexion glide. The therapist applies accessory glide to targeted zygapophyseal level while the patient actively performs symptomatic movement (e.g., forward flexion), performing repetitions with the therapist maintaining the glide.
Unloaded-SNAG
patients will receive unloaded SNAG from quadruped position to reduce the axial loading. The therapist applies the equivalent accessory glide at the symptomatic spinal level while the patient performs the symptomatic movement (modified to be non-weight-bearing).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Loaded-SNAG
patients will receive SNAGs from standing (Loaded-SNAG), step-stance, or functional position that provokes symptoms. A specialized Mulligan belt was used around the patient's waist and the therapist's hips. The mobilizing force was applied parallel to the facet joint plane (cephalic direction) and over the spinous processes of the respective symptomatic spinal levels. The therapist's hand's ulnar aspect was used over the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved segment for flexion glide. The therapist applies accessory glide to targeted zygapophyseal level while the patient actively performs symptomatic movement (e.g., forward flexion), performing repetitions with the therapist maintaining the glide.
Unloaded-SNAG
patients will receive unloaded SNAG from quadruped position to reduce the axial loading. The therapist applies the equivalent accessory glide at the symptomatic spinal level while the patient performs the symptomatic movement (modified to be non-weight-bearing).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Who scored between three and six on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
* Restriction of the movement was only in flexion ROM
Exclusion Criteria
* Obese,
* Infectious conditions of the spine,
* Autoimmune disorders,
* Malignancy
* Any contraindication to physiotherapy and manual therapy
* Any patient received physical therapy sessions last 6 months
20 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hail
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ehab Mohamed Kamel Ahmed
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Clinics
Hail, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-2025-910
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.