PRoducing Outcome Measures for OTP Quality Improvement

NCT ID: NCT07214389

Last Updated: 2025-10-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-03

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study tests ways to help opioid treatment programs (OTPs) keep patients in care. Staying on methadone or buprenorphine is linked to better outcomes, yet many people leave treatment early. The project will compare two approaches that provide clinics with retention/outcome quality measures and a quality-improvement (QI) toolkit-either alone or with added facilitation-against usual care.

Forty-five BayMark OTPs in multiple states will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) quality measures + QI toolkit; (2) quality measures + QI toolkit + external QI facilitation; or (3) usual care.

The primary outcome is 90-day retention in treatment, measured from OTP electronic health records and Medicaid claims. Secondary outcomes include emergency department visits, hospitalizations, overdoses, and mortality. Findings will identify practical, scalable strategies to improve patient retention in OTPs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This cluster-randomized trial is part of an NIH/NIDA-funded program to advance quality measurement and management for opioid treatment programs (OTPs). PROMOTE-QI (Project 2) tests whether providing OTPs with retention/outcome quality measures and a quality-improvement (QI) toolkit, with or without additional QI facilitation, improves patient retention compared with usual care. The study is conducted in partnership with BayMark Health Services and academic/industry collaborators.

Design and setting. Forty-five BayMark OTPs in multiple states will be randomized in equal groups to three arms (≈15 sites/arm) in a parallel-group cluster design. We anticipate \~4,500 adult MOUD initiations across the 45 sites during the 12-month post-implementation observation window. Patients are not individually assigned; outcomes are derived from EHR and Medicaid claims.

Interventions. Arm 1: Quality measures + QI toolkit. Sites receive claims-based, case-mix-adjusted retention and outcome quality measures with benchmarks, plus a toolkit (evidence summaries, case studies, and "how-to" materials) to guide retention-focused QI efforts, delivered via a secure portal.

Arm 2: Quality measures + QI toolkit + QI facilitation (NIATx). Sites receive all Arm-1 components plus structured NIATx facilitation, including establishing a change team and running Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to implement and test retention strategies.

Arm 3: Usual care. Sites continue existing practices; at study end they will be offered the quality-measure portal and toolkit.

Primary and secondary outcomes. The primary endpoint is the OTP's 90-day treatment retention rate. Secondary endpoints are the OTP's 90-day retention rate of medications to treat OUD, the percentage of the OTP's patients with an ED visit or hospitalization for a substance use disorder (SUD), and the percentage with an ED visit or hospitalization for any cause.

Data sources and analysis. Outcomes will be drawn from BayMark electronic health records (EHR) and Medicaid T-MSIS claims. Analyses use generalized linear mixed models that account for clustering at the OTP level; retention/discontinuation rules (e.g., ≥31-day gap) follow the study's measurement specifications.

Implementation outcomes. The study will document strategies adopted, barriers/facilitators, and costs of QI facilitation via surveys/interviews and cost tracking.

Rationale. Prior work shows audit-and-feedback is more effective when paired with actionable guidance; the trial therefore compares quality measures + toolkit with and without facilitation to determine the incremental benefit of NIATx support.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Use Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel-group, cluster-randomized trial at the opioid treatment program (OTP) level. Forty-five BayMark OTPs (\~15 per arm) are randomized 1:1:1 to: (1) quality measures + QI toolkit; (2) quality measures + QI toolkit + external QI facilitation (NIATx); or (3) usual care. Patients are not individually assigned; outcomes are derived from routinely collected EHR and Medicaid claims. Enrollment reflects the expected number of adult MOUD initiations during the 12-month post-implementation window across participating sites (\~100 per site; total ≈ 4,500). Open-label; analyses account for clustering at the OTP level.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

This is an open-label, cluster-randomized implementation trial. OTPs, care providers, and investigators will be aware of arm assignment. Masking is not feasible because the interventions-provision of clinic-level quality measures and a QI toolkit, with or without external QI facilitation-are organizational changes visible to staff. Patient outcomes are obtained from EHR and Medicaid claims; the central analytic team may be masked to arm labels when feasible.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1 - Title: Quality Measures + QI Toolkit

OTPs in this arm receive clinic-level quality measures (claims-based, case-mix-adjusted retention/outcome measures with benchmarks and peer comparisons) plus a self-guided QI toolkit (evidence summaries, change packages, templates, and examples) to support retention-focused practice changes. No external facilitation is provided

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quality Measures (Audit and Feedback)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinic-level reports/dashboards providing case-mix-adjusted retention and outcome measures with benchmarks and peer comparisons, derived from EHR and Medicaid claims; delivered periodically to guide quality improvement.

Quality Improvement (QI) Toolkit

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A self-guided QI toolkit for OTPs with step-by-step change packages, PDSA templates, training materials, and case examples to improve retention. Provided together with the quality measures in Arms 1-2; designed for use without external facilitation.

Arm 2 - Title: Quality Measures + QI Toolkit + External QI Facilitation

OTPs receive the quality measures and QI toolkit as in Arm 1 plus structured external QI facilitation based on the NIATx model. Facilitators coach an OTP change team, review data, and guide PDSA cycles to implement retention-focused improvements

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quality Measures (Audit and Feedback)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinic-level reports/dashboards providing case-mix-adjusted retention and outcome measures with benchmarks and peer comparisons, derived from EHR and Medicaid claims; delivered periodically to guide quality improvement.

Quality Improvement (QI) Toolkit

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A self-guided QI toolkit for OTPs with step-by-step change packages, PDSA templates, training materials, and case examples to improve retention. Provided together with the quality measures in Arms 1-2; designed for use without external facilitation.

External QI Facilitation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Structured facilitation based on the NIATx model. Facilitators provide training, coaching, and feedback to an OTP change team, using the measures and toolkit to guide retention-focused QI.

Arm 3 - Title: No Intervention: Usual Care

OTPs continue usual practice without access to the quality measures or QI toolkit and with no external facilitation during the study. Outcomes are assessed from EHR and Medicaid claims.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quality Measures (Audit and Feedback)

Clinic-level reports/dashboards providing case-mix-adjusted retention and outcome measures with benchmarks and peer comparisons, derived from EHR and Medicaid claims; delivered periodically to guide quality improvement.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Quality Improvement (QI) Toolkit

A self-guided QI toolkit for OTPs with step-by-step change packages, PDSA templates, training materials, and case examples to improve retention. Provided together with the quality measures in Arms 1-2; designed for use without external facilitation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

External QI Facilitation

Structured facilitation based on the NIATx model. Facilitators provide training, coaching, and feedback to an OTP change team, using the measures and toolkit to guide retention-focused QI.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Only BayMark OTPs are eligible for participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

BayMark Health Services

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health - Substance Abuse Prevention and Control (SAPC)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

RTI International

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tami Mark

Distinguished Fellow, Health Policy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tami L Mark, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

RTI International

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

RTI International

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tami L Mark, PhD

Role: CONTACT

301-816-4612

Emily C Costilow, MA, PMP

Role: CONTACT

910-233-7508

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tami L Mark, PhD

Role: primary

301-816-4612

Katherine Treiman, PhD

Role: backup

301-230 4645

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RM1DA059375

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

RTI-HEAL-OTP-P2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Therapy for People With Opioid Use Disorder
NCT06008769 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Buprenorphine Maintenance Protocol - 1
NCT00000205 COMPLETED PHASE3
Sex and Female Empowerment
NCT02197715 COMPLETED NA