Freezing in Parkinson's Disease

NCT ID: NCT07212205

Last Updated: 2025-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-10

Study Completion Date

2023-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a visual and auditory cueing walker on freezing of gait during walking in patients with Parkinson\'s disease (PDF), compared to Parkinson patients without freezing of gait (PDNF).Sample size was calculated to detect a difference of 0.37 m/sec on mean velocity, with a deviation of 0.3 m/sec, two-sided 5% significance level, and power of 90%. Considering the expected 10% dropout rate, twelve subjects were included.Researcher R1 determined whether the subject was eligible for inclusion in the trial and researcher R2 carried out the gait analysis. Both examiners were unaware of group allocation. An independent researcher (R3) performed the clinical evaluation before the procedures started. Participants walked back and forth on a 7-meter walking path under two different conditions: without cues and with a walker providing visual and auditory cues. To assess the risk of falls in both groups, the \"Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment\" was conducted. Additionally, the \"Dynamic Gait Index\" was used to evaluate the ability to adapt walking to varying task demands, and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was employed to determine walking speed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study suggests that a walker providing visual and auditory cues may improve daily walking in patients with Parkinson\'s disease with freezing of gait (PDF) and reduce the risk of falls in patients with Parkinson\'s disease without freezing of gait (PDNF) who exhibit hypokinetic gait patterns.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Arm 1: PDF (Parkinson's Disease with Freezing of Gait)

Intervention: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual \& auditory cueing walker.

Arm 2: PDNF (Parkinson's Disease without Freezing of Gait)

Intervention: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual \& auditory cueing walker.

This is a non-randomized interventional study with two parallel groups (PDF and PDNF). Each participant was assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual and auditory cueing walker. The two conditions are repeated measures within each arm
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PDF (Parkinson's Disease with Freezing of Gait)

Intervention Name: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Description:

"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."

Planned Enrollment: 18

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention Name:

Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Other Intervention Names (varsa):

Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues

Intervention Description:

"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."

Planned Enrollment: 18

PDNF (Parkinson's Disease without Freezing of Gait)

Intervention Name: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Description:

"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the absence of freezing of gait."

Planned Enrollment: 12

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention Name:

Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Other Intervention Names (varsa):

Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues

Intervention Description:

"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."

Planned Enrollment: 18

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker

Intervention Name:

Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker

Other Intervention Names (varsa):

Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues

Intervention Description:

"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."

Planned Enrollment: 18

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Necmettin Erbakan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Neslihan Altuntas Yilmaz

Asst. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nezahat Keleşoğlu Faculty of Health Sciences

Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Necmettin Erbakan University

Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Necmettin Erbakan university

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

nezahat keleşoğlu

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.