Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-10
2023-12-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Türkish Version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
NCT03413787
Provocation of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease
NCT04799613
Dual-Task Balance and Gait Training Combined With Cognitive Training in Parkinson's Patients
NCT07213232
The Effects of Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait Training on Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT05439967
Digital Wearable Walking Aid for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson´s Disease
NCT03978507
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
Intervention: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual \& auditory cueing walker.
Arm 2: PDNF (Parkinson's Disease without Freezing of Gait)
Intervention: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual \& auditory cueing walker.
This is a non-randomized interventional study with two parallel groups (PDF and PDNF). Each participant was assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual and auditory cueing walker. The two conditions are repeated measures within each arm
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PDF (Parkinson's Disease with Freezing of Gait)
Intervention Name: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Description:
"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."
Planned Enrollment: 18
Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker
Intervention Name:
Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Other Intervention Names (varsa):
Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues
Intervention Description:
"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."
Planned Enrollment: 18
PDNF (Parkinson's Disease without Freezing of Gait)
Intervention Name: Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Description:
"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the absence of freezing of gait."
Planned Enrollment: 12
Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker
Intervention Name:
Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Other Intervention Names (varsa):
Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues
Intervention Description:
"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."
Planned Enrollment: 18
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker
Intervention Name:
Visual \& Auditory Cueing Walker
Other Intervention Names (varsa):
Cueing Walker Walker with Visual \& Auditory Cues
Intervention Description:
"Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait."
Planned Enrollment: 18
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Necmettin Erbakan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neslihan Altuntas Yilmaz
Asst. Prof.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nezahat Keleşoğlu Faculty of Health Sciences
Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)
Necmettin Erbakan University
Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Necmettin Erbakan university
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
nezahat keleşoğlu
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.