The Effect of Patient Preference for Treatment Model in Internet Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder
NCT ID: NCT07201844
Last Updated: 2025-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
440 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-26
2028-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Do patients who are randomized to choose their treatment improve more in their GAD symptoms compared to patients who are randomly assigned to a treatment?
* Does allowing patients to choose their treatment increase treatment adherence, compared to being randomly assigned to a treatment?
* Does allowing patients to choose their treatment increase treatment satisfaction and credibility, compared to being randomly assigned to a treatment?
* Does allowing patients to choose their treatment increase patients' sense of agency related to the treatment process, compared to being randomly assigned to a treatment?
* Do patients who receive a treatment that matches the psychologist's prediction of which treatment would fit the patient best show better treatment outcomes (primarily reduction in GAD symptoms over time, but also secondary outcomes such as satisfaction), compared to patients who receive a treatment that does not match the psychologist's prediction?
Participants included in the trial will be randomized to one of two conditions: 1) read short descriptions of the two treatment programs and based on that choose the preferred treatment, 2) randomly being allocated to one of the two treatments. The two internet-based treatment programs which the patients can choose between or be randomly allocated to are: 1) Intolerance of uncertainty-based ICBT and 2) Metacognition-based ICBT. Both programs consist of 8 treatment modules and run for 10 weeks. Patients in both conditions receive continuous support by a psychologist through a built-in message function on the treatment platform. The patient will receive feedback from the psychologist on their assignments and exercises and the psychologist will respond to the participants' messages.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Internet-Versus Group-Administered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Panic Disorder
NCT00845260
Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for Children Age 8-12 Years With Anxiety Disorders
NCT01533402
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Health Anxiety: Internet Treatment Versus Face-to-Face Therapy
NCT02314065
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Youths With Anxiety Disorders
NCT06661460
A Comparison Between Internet Therapy and Group Therapy for Social Phobia - A Trial Using Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
NCT00564967
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Included patients will be randomized (2:1:1) to either 1) read short descriptions of the two treatment programs and based on that choose the preferred treatment or 2) being randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. In both conditions, a psychologist will make a prediction regarding which of the two treatments the patient will benefit most from, based on their clinical assessment of the patient. The treatment effect for patients who were either randomly assigned to, or chose, a treatment that matches the psychologist's prediction will be compared with the treatment effect for patients who were either randomly assigned to, or chose, a treatment that does not match the psychologist's prediction.
The two internet-based treatment programs which the patients can choose between or be randomly allocated to are: 1) Intolerance of uncertainty-based ICBT and 2) Metacognition-based ICBT. These programs will be conducted as part of regular care at the Internet Psychiatry Clinic in Stockholm, meaning that each patient will undergo the regular assessment process at the clinic. Both programs are ICBT programs of similar scope, consisting of 8 modules to be completed during 10 weeks. During this time patients read written material which instructs them to do specific exercises and answer specific questions. The patient can message a psychologist at the clinic via a built-in message function on the treatment platform.
Primary outcome to assess treatment effect in this study is change in GAD-symptoms (measured with GAD-7) from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Secondary outcome measures to assess treatment effect is patients' satisfaction with the treatment program post-treatment (measured with Client satisfaction questionnaire), how credible the patient consider the treatment program to be (measured with Treatment Credibility Questionnaire 2 weeks after treatment start) and patients' sense of agency related to their treatment process (measured with Therapeutic Agency Inventory 4 weeks after treatment start). Patients' adherence to the treatment program will be assessed by the number of completed modules by the end of treatment.
A power analysis has shown that n=200 in each arm gives at least 80% power to detect a minimally clinically significant effect of d=.24. Based on similar treatments at the Internet Psychiatry Clinic the investigators expect around 10% drop-out meaning that the aim is to include 440 patients in total to get 200 in each arm.
Hypothesis 1: Patients who are allowed to choose their preferred treatment will exhibit a greater treatment effect (specified above) compared to patients who are randomly assigned to a treatment.
Hypothesis 2: Patients will 1) have a higher sense of agency in their treatment process, 2) be more satisfied with the treatment, 3) be more adherent to the treatment and 4) will rate the treatment as more credible if they themselves get to choose treatment compared to random assignment.
Hypothesis 3: Patients who receive a treatment that matches the psychologist's prediction will exhibit a greater treatment effect (specified above), compared to patients who receive a treatment that does not match the psychologist's prediction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment choice
Patients have been randomized to getting to read about and then choose one of the two treatments
Metacognitive Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the metacognitive model of excessive worry
Intolerance of uncertainty based Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the Intolerance of uncertainty model of excessive worry
Random assignment to treatment
Patients have been directly randomized into one of the two treatments
Metacognitive Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the metacognitive model of excessive worry
Intolerance of uncertainty based Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the Intolerance of uncertainty model of excessive worry
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metacognitive Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the metacognitive model of excessive worry
Intolerance of uncertainty based Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Specialist Guided Internet delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy based on the Intolerance of uncertainty model of excessive worry
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meet diagnostic criteria for GAD according to DSM-5, as assessed by a psychologist on a video-call.
* Self-rated score ≥ 7 on GAD-7.
* Can read and speak Swedish fluently.
* Have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer and a Swedish BankID which allows access to the video-calls and treatment platform.
* Have the time and possibility to participate in the 10 week treatment.
* Consents to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Current drug or alcohol abuse.
* Current severe somatic health concern or social vulnerability if this is judged to be too great an obstacle for the patient to carry out the treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erik Forsell
Principal Researcher
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Internet Psychiatry Clinic, Psychiatry Southwest, SLSO, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Huddinge 14135
Stockholm, Sverige, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Nathalie Lybert, MSc
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-03553-01 RCT2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.