Meloxicam in Mohs Micrographic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07200544

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-15

Study Completion Date

2026-08-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore alternative methods of postoperative pain control in Mohs micrographic surgery. The main aims are:

* To provide more information to the Mohs surgery community regarding postoperative pain control.
* Reducing pain improves the overall comfort and well-being of patients, leading to a better post-operative experience.
* To provide patients with an alternative and potentially superior NSAID for pain control (compared to standard-of-care ibuprofen).

Researchers will compare 1) a single of dose Meloxicam 7.5 mg, followed by acetaminophen 500 mg; 2) a single dose of Meloxicam 15 mg, followed by acetaminophen 500 mg; 3) a single dose of acetaminophen 500 mg, followed by alternating ibuprofen 200 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg to see which better moderate pain control and patient satisfaction.

Participants will be asked to complete pain and patient satisfaction surveys.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a microscope-guided tissue-sparing surgical procedure for the removal of certain skin cancers, in which 100% of the surgical margin is examined. It is the gold-standard for the treatment of high-risk and aggressive nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is an incredibly safe procedure and postoperative complications are uncommon, occurring in only 0.72% of cases. It is the most cost-effective form of skin cancer removal and has higher cure rates when compared to standard excision.

Despite the safety and tolerability of the procedure, postoperative patient concerns have been assessed in the literature with pain being the most common. Using classical pain assessment models, pain is often assessed by the patient as mild to moderate. On average pain is at its worst on POD0 of surgery, with one study finding peak pain scores between 2PM to 10PM on POD02. Studies have often demonstrated that the most painful anatomical sites are the nose, ear, forehead, scalp, periorbital region, and lip with the scalp being associated with the most postoperative pain. Those who undergo linear closure or second intent healing report significantly less pain postoperatively than those who undergo flaps and full-thickness-skin grafts with age (\<66 years), number of lesions, and consumption of narcotics for pain relief.

Specific Aims, long-term objectives, research accomplishments:

This study will hopefully provide more information to the Mohs surgery community regarding postoperative pain control.

Reducing pain improves the overall comfort and well-being of patients, leading to a better post-operative experience.

To provide patients with an alternative and potentially superior NSAID for pain control (compared to standard-of-care ibuprofen).

To provide a pain medication option that has a longer half-life with a reduction in patient breakthrough pain and the necessity of taking more frequent medication Discovering non-opioid pain control methods can help decrease the reliance on opioids, reducing the risk of addiction and other opioid-related side effects.

Managing pain effectively can help prevent post-operative anxiety and depression, contributing to better mental health outcomes Managing pain effectively can contribute to better Mohs surgery patient outcomes Advances in pain management can contribute to more personalized approaches, tailoring pain control strategies to individual patient needs

Background and Significance:

Standard of care postoperative pain control in Mohs micrographic surgery is alternating Tylenol and ibuprofen as directed on the manufactures label. Randomized controlled trials on postoperative pain in MMS. Upon literature review there have not been any studies in MMS using meloxicam as a postoperative pain alternative to standard of care. To date, acetaminophen and codeine, celecoxib, pregabalin, naproxen, aspirin, and other opioid prescriptions have been used for postoperative pain5-7

Meloxicam is approved for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the United States. At low doses it is COX-2 preferential, inhibiting prostanoid synthesis in inflammatory cells. In clinical trials, meloxicam was found to be as effective as naproxen, piroxicam, and diclofenac with few GI symptoms and lower incidence of perforation, obstruction and bleeding8. Compared to the medications listed above, oral meloxicam has the longest half-life at around 20 hours8. Given its long half-life, the investigators hypothesize that meloxicam will result in pain control over the postoperative time periods when pain is at its worst (POD0 and POD1). This will decrease the need for adding other pain control medicines, decrease break through pain, and increase patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control. Postoperative pain in MMS has been explored for decades and this pain-control alternative can be used as a useful tool for the surgeon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain, Acute Skin Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned to one of three groups, and each group receives a different intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Randomization will occur on which of the 3 groups each patient will be enrolled in, thus the investigators and participants will know which group they are in.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of Care (Acetaminophen/Ibuprofen)

This randomized control group will take a mandatory one-time dose of 500 mg acetaminophen with alternating 200 mg ibuprofen and 500 mg acetaminophen (standard of care) every 3 hours for pain.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetaminophen 500mg

Intervention Type DRUG

This randomized control group will take a mandatory one-time dose of 500 mg acetaminophen with alternating 200 mg ibuprofen and 500 mg acetaminophen (standard of care) every 3 hours for pain.

Meloxicam 7.5 mg

This randomly assigned experimental group will take a mandatory one-time dose of oral Meloxicam 7.5 mg with as-needed acetaminophen 500 mg every 3 hours. Administration of Meloxicam will be upon completion of Mohs closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meloxicam 7.5 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 7.5mg dose after Mohs closure.

Meloxicam 15 mg

This randomly assigned experimental group will take a mandatory one-time dose of oral Meloxicam 15 mg with as-needed acetaminophen 500 mg every 3 hours. Administration of Meloxicam will be upon completion of Mohs closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meloxicam 15 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 15mg dose after Mohs closure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meloxicam 7.5 mg

This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 7.5mg dose after Mohs closure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Meloxicam 15 mg

This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 15mg dose after Mohs closure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetaminophen 500mg

This randomized control group will take a mandatory one-time dose of 500 mg acetaminophen with alternating 200 mg ibuprofen and 500 mg acetaminophen (standard of care) every 3 hours for pain.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients who consents to the study and are undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery at the University of Oklahoma.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women who are pregnant, suspected to be pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study period will be excluded from participation.
* Chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis, acute hepatitis, cirrhosis, NASH, NAFLD, alcoholic liver disease, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease)
* Chronic kidney disease stage III or greater,
* Aspirin-sensitive asthma
* History of chronic NSAID use
* Patients vulnerable to drug interactions
* GI bleeds
* Peptic ulcers
* Non-English speakers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oklahoma

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lindsey Collins, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Oklahoma, Department of Dermatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chase Pitchford, MD

Role: CONTACT

405-271-6110

Landon Hendrickson, MD

Role: CONTACT

405-271-6110

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chase Pitchford

Role: primary

405-271-6110

Lindsey Collins

Role: backup

405-271-6110

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Limthongkul B, Samie F, Humphreys TR. Assessment of postoperative pain after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):857-63. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12166. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23464845 (View on PubMed)

Benzon HT. Practical management of pain. 2014;

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Evans T, Nicholas TA, Sutton AV, Wysong A. How We Do It: Postoperative Pain Control in Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Feb 1;47(2):280-282. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002279. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31809346 (View on PubMed)

Sniezek PJ, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen, acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and acetaminophen and codeine for postoperative pain relief after Mohs surgery and cutaneous reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1007-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02022.x. Epub 2011 May 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21561527 (View on PubMed)

Firoz BF, Goldberg LH, Arnon O, Mamelak AJ. An analysis of pain and analgesia after Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Jul;63(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.049.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20542176 (View on PubMed)

Saco M, Golda N. Optimal timing of postoperative pharmacologic pain control in Mohs micrographic surgery: A prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):495-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Jul 30. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31374303 (View on PubMed)

Alam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M, Strasswimmer JM, Jiang SI, Cohen JL, Albano BJ, Batra P, Behshad R, Benedetto AV, Chan CS, Chilukuri S, Crocker C, Crystal HW, Dhir A, Faulconer VA, Goldberg LH, Goodman C, Greenbaum SS, Hale EK, Hanke CW, Hruza GJ, Jacobson L, Jones J, Kimyai-Asadi A, Kouba D, Lahti J, Macias K, Miller SJ, Monk E, Nguyen TH, Oganesyan G, Pennie M, Pontius K, Posten W, Reichel JL, Rohrer TE, Rooney JA, Tran HT, Poon E, Bolotin D, Dubina M, Pace N, Kim N, Disphanurat W, Kathawalla U, Kakar R, West DP, Veledar E, Yoo S. Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Dec;149(12):1378-85. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24080866 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Maxigesic IV Phase 3 Bunionectomy Study
NCT02689063 COMPLETED PHASE3
Bunionectomy Trial With GRT6005
NCT00872885 COMPLETED PHASE2