Validation of the Setswana Translated Quality of Recovery Questionnaire in Orthopaedic Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa
NCT ID: NCT07194369
Last Updated: 2025-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-10-15
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does the Setswana translation of the QoR-15 serve as a valid, reliable and user friendly tool for assessing postoperative recovery in Setswana speaking patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery at a tertiary hospital in Gauteng, South Africa?
The participants will be asked to complete the Setswana-translated QoR-15 questionnaire both preoperatively and postoperatively.
In addition, they will be asked to rate their overall postoperative recovery using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Translation and Validation of the French Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15
NCT03578068
Validation of the German Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire
NCT04528524
Quality of Recovery in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit
NCT06905353
Korean Version of the "Quality of Recovery 15" After General Anesthesia
NCT04169087
Validation of the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire for the Postanesthesia Care Unit (QoR-PACU)
NCT04528537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While quality of recovery measures have been widely applied in general and ambulatory surgery settings, there is a relative paucity of data specifically addressing orthopaedic populations.
Orthopaedic surgical procedures are associated with significant postoperative pain, functional limitations and extended rehabilitation periods, all of which can substantially impact the patient's overall recovery experience. Evaluating a short-term postoperative outcome like quality of recovery in this surgical cohort may help tailor postoperative care to patient needs, which may lead to better patient-clinician communication, better surgical outcomes and better patient satisfaction.
A lack of standardised and validated outcome measures in local languages and high rates of illiteracy may be impediments to implementing widespread use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in practice. Patients who are functionally literate may still not understand medical terms if not presented in their home language and proficiency in English varies widely across South Africa. South Africa has a diverse language heritage with 11 official languages and high rates of functional illiteracy. While many South Africans are able to communicate in English, only a small minority reports English as the primary language used most often outside the household. For black South Africans, the most common languages spoken outside of the home most commonly are IsiZulu, IsiXhosa and the Sotho-Tswana languages.
At present, validated translations of the QoR-15 questionnaire are only available in English and IsiZulu for South African use.
By adding another validated translation in a local language, it is hoped that it will be easier to measure quality of recovery in Setswana speaking populations to address health disparities.
A Setswana translation of the QoR-15 questionnaire exists from a previous study which may be of use in Ga-Rankuwa, which is home to a Setswana speaking population. This translated questionnaire is yet to be validated in this population. For patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be effective in non-English speaking populations, rigorous linguistic and cultural adaptation is necessary.
In this study, quality of recovery will be measured with the Setswana translation of the QoR-15 questionnaire as well as with a visual analog scale on which patients can rate their overall postoperative recovery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled elective orthopaedic surgery at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients booked for emergency surgery where a delay to surgery could be detrimental.
* Patients where the surgery is delayed beyond 10 days of the initial assessment and pre-operative QoR-15 measurement.
* Patients with a psychiatric disturbance that precludes complete co-operation.
* Patients with a severe debilitating medical or surgical condition that may limit objective assessment after surgery.
* Patients with any life threatening postoperative complication.
* Postoperative confusion or delirium.
* Patients with a history of recent drug or alcohol abuse which may render responses unreliable.
* Incomplete QoR-15 questionnaires.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Unathi Mzinyathi
DR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charle Dr Steyl
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SMUREC/M/276/2025:PG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.