MedDataX Logo

Spanish Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the QoR-15E

NCT ID: NCT04699500

Last Updated: 2021-12-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

242 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-02

Study Completion Date

2021-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The satisfactory recovery of the patient after a surgery with an anesthetic request is very important for a quality and excellence assistance. The quality of recovery questionnaire QoR-15 was validated by their authors in 2013 with the study titled development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. This questionnaire allows a comprehensive assessment by associating the physiological parameters until then assessed with the subjective personal perception of the patient of his state of health. With the consent of its original author, this study is carried out to validate the questionnaire in Spanish and adapted to our environment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Humans Reproducibility of Results Cross-Cultural Comparison Surveys and Questionnaires Postoperative Period Anesthetics Perception

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Quality Recovery Anesthesia Validation Adaptation Spanish

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years old.
* Comprehensive and sign informed consent.
* Knows and understands the Spanish language.
* Undergo a scheduled surgical intervention under any type of anesthetic procedure from the specialties of general surgery, urology and gynecology.
* Score \> 26 points in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years old.
* Not having signed the informed consent.
* Not knowing or understanding the Spanish language.
* Surgical intervention from other specialties than general surgery, urology and gynecology.
* Score \< 27 points in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susana Manrique Muñoz, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Miriam de Nadal Clanchet, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comitè Ètic d'Investigació Clínica HUVH

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23411725 (View on PubMed)

Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10740540 (View on PubMed)

Kleif J, Edwards HM, Sort R, Vilandt J, Gogenur I. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25867135 (View on PubMed)

Sa AC, Sousa G, Santos A, Santos C, Abelha FJ. Quality of Recovery after Anesthesia: Validation of the Portuguese Version of the 'Quality of Recovery 15' Questionnaire. Acta Med Port. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):567-74. doi: 10.20344/amp.6129. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26667859 (View on PubMed)

Llamas-Velasco S, Llorente-Ayuso L, Contador I, Bermejo-Pareja F. [Spanish versions of the Minimental State Examination (MMSE). Questions for their use in clinical practice]. Rev Neurol. 2015 Oct 16;61(8):363-71. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26461130 (View on PubMed)

Demumieux F, Ludes PO, Diemunsch P, Bennett-Guerrero E, Lujic M, Lefebvre F, Noll E. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32303379 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PR(AG)620/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id