Study-group on Palliative ERCP And RFA-ablation in Metastatic and Inoperable Pancreatic Tumors
NCT ID: NCT07191418
Last Updated: 2025-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-30
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer of the Pancreas or Bile Duct
NCT00010088
A Multicenter Single-arm Prospective Clinical Study on First-line Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastases With Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Embolization Combined With Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
NCT07333287
Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Gemcitabine Failure.
NCT01971034
Mesopancreatic Excision for Pancreatic Duct Adenocarcinoma.
NCT07148830
Irreversible Electroporation Ablation Combined With Anti-PD(L)1 Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
NCT06677762
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At diagnosis, approximately 50% of patients already present with metastatic disease (mPDAC). Despite advancements in chemotherapy and surgery, the overall prognosis for pancreatic cancer has remained largely unchanged over the past four decades. The incidence closely mirrors the mortality rate, indicating that most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer will ultimately succumb to local progression or distant metastasis. While nearly all patients with pancreatic cancer eventually enter a metastatic phase, there is a lack of innovative therapeutic options targeted to this population. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), patients with mPDAC continue to have poor outcomes, even with current standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab- paclitaxel (GEM/nab-PTX), which yield a median overall survival (OS) of only 11.1 and 8.5 months, respectively. In contrast to PDAC, locoregional ablation therapies have increasingly become part of palliative care strategies for other cancers. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well- established technique that uses thermal energy to induce coagulative necrosis of tumor tissue.
It has demonstrated both curative and palliative benefits in various solid tumors. There is also emerging evidence that RFA may stimulate systemic anti-tumor immune responses, although these effects remain underexplored in pancreatic cancer. To date, only a few small studies have examined the role of localized ablation in PDAC, with limited insight into its survival benefits. However, recent advancements in endoscopic technology have made it possible to deliver RFA directly into the bile duct, even in anatomically challenging locations. The majority of PDAC tumors arise in the head of the pancreas, in close proximity to the bile duct. This frequently leads to compression or infiltration of the bile duct, and painless jaundice is often one of the first clinical signs. As the disease progresses, most patients develop biliary obstruction, requiring biliary decompression via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC).
During ERCP, RFA catheters small enough to pass through a duodenoscope can be used to deliver targeted ablation to tumor tissue involving the bile duct. Retrospective studies have suggested that intraductal RFA for malignant biliary obstruction may prolong survival in patients with a range of cancers, although these studies lack randomization and are often limited by heterogeneity and small sample sizes. To date, uncontrolled retrospective studies and a recent meta-analysis have suggested a potential survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in malignant biliary obstruction.
However, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) has questioned its true efficacy as an anti-cancer treatment.The majority of existing studies have focused on heterogeneous patient cohorts, often including mixed populations with malignant biliary strictures from both pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, and at various disease stages. As a result, it remains impossible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the survival benefit of RFA, due to subgroup underpowering and selection bias inherent in these study designs.
Moreover, robust data are lacking on several key endpoints, including cancer-specific survival, treatment safety, overall survival, and quality of life (QoL), all of which are essential for evaluating the clinical utility of RFA in this setting. In this trial, we aim to treat patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) limited to liver-only metastases by delivering endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) directly into the bile duct. The primary objective is to apply ablative energy at the site where the primary pancreatic tumor infiltrates or compresses the bile duct, inducing partial tumor lysis via coagulative necrosis. Eligible patients must have a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of mPDAC and be undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria target patients with a limited metastatic burden confined exclusively to the liver. Participants may have previously received biliary decompression through fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), plastic stents placed during ERCP, or internal/external percutaneous drainage (PTC). Additionally, patients with an established diagnosis of mPDAC on palliative chemotherapy who develop jaundice later in the disease course, such as those with tumors in the uncinate process, which may delay bile duct involvement due to anatomical considerations, will be included.
Patients will be randomized into two arms:
Control arm: placement of a fully covered metal stent alone Intervention arm: intraductal RFA followed by placement of a fully covered metal stent RFA within the bile duct is expected to ablate tumor tissue both inside and immediately outside the duct. Placement of the fully covered metal stent after RFA serves a prophylactic role, sealing any micro- or macroperforations caused by ablation and ensuring optimal bile flow management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I: Endobiliary RFA + Biliary Stent Placement (Investigational Arm)
Patients randomized to this arm will undergo:
Endobiliary RFA Procedure:
Performed via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A radiofrequency ablation catheter, Habib™ EndoHPB is introduced into the biliary tract.
Controlled thermal energy is applied to the malignant biliary stricture to ablate tumor tissue intraductally. RFA energy settings, duration of application, and number of applications will be standardized per protocol. Biliary Stent Placement: Immediately following RFA, a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or plastic stent will be deployed across the stricture to maintain biliary patency. The type and size of the stent will be based on clinical standard and anatomy.
Supporting Treatment:
Patients will receive standard systemic chemotherapy per national guidelines for metastatic pancreatic cancer (e.g., FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel).
Supportive care includes antibiotics peri-ERCP, analgesics, antiemetics, and biliary drainage monitoring.
Habib™ EndoHPB
This study will hold greater weight compared to previous ones, as it is randomized. It includes 178 patients, exclusively with pancreatic cancer, and is designed as a prospective investigation.
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as part of clinical routine.
Arm II: Biliary Stent Placement Alone (Control Arm)
Patients randomized to the control group will receive:
Biliary Stent Placement Only:
Performed via ERCP as above, without RFA. A SEMS or plastic stent will be placed across the malignant stricture.
Supporting Treatment:
Identical systemic chemotherapy regimens and supportive care protocols as in Arm I.
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as part of clinical routine.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Habib™ EndoHPB
This study will hold greater weight compared to previous ones, as it is randomized. It includes 178 patients, exclusively with pancreatic cancer, and is designed as a prospective investigation.
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as part of clinical routine.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Metastatic stage to the liver
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC.
* Cancer burden limited to maximum 5 metastases in the liver, each of them maximum 1 cm in the larger diameter.
* Patients must be under palliative chemotherapy treatment.
* Cancer should be radiologically measurable (in an area not previously irradiated).
* WHO performance status 0-2.
* Age 18-85 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* which hinders the ability to give informed consent.
* Ongoing extensive immunosuppression and/or severe leuko- or
* thrombocytopenia.
* Ongoing acute cholangitis.
* Ongoing sepsis.
* Acute kidney failure.
* Uncompensated heart failure or unstable coronary insufficiency
* (symptomatic/uncompensated).
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Any metastases outside the liver.
* Cardiac pacemakers/cardioverter defibrillators.
* Severe coagulopathy.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roberto Valente
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roberto Valente
MD, PhD, Senior Consultant Gastroenterologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Surgery, Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Roberto Valente, MD, PHD, Head of Surgical Endo
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIV-23-03-042680
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Spearmint
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.