Double Bypass Versus Stent-treatment in Irresectable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01569282
Last Updated: 2019-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neoadjuvant Treatment in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01900327
Conventional Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy Versus an Extended Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancers
NCT06703905
Pancreas-sparing Duodenectomy Versus Pancreatoduodenectomy for Early-stage Periampullary Carcinoma
NCT01291927
Combination Therapy of L19IL2 and Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients
NCT01198522
HIPEC as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT02850874
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Double bypass
Hepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy
Standard surgical techniques
Stent Strategy
Stent strategy
Biliary and/or enteral stents on demand
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy
Standard surgical techniques
Stent strategy
Biliary and/or enteral stents on demand
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with stent treated tumor in the pancreatic head or periampullary planned for pancreaticoduodenectomy
* The patient jaundice should have worn off and there should be no signs of duodenal obstruction
* The patient has given informed consent after verbal and written information in accordance with approved ethics application
* The patient has no anatomical conditions making endoscopic therapy impossible such as previous Billroth II or Gastric Bypass.
2. Intraoperatively
* Peroperative findings of of carcinomatosis, metastases or local irresectability who oppose radical surgery
* Surgical double bypass should be technically feasible
* The patient has given informed consent after verbal and written information in accordance with approved ethics application
Exclusion Criteria
* Peroperative findings of gastric outlet obstruction
* Surgical double bypass not technically feasible
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Göteborg University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Fändriks, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Göteborg University
Claes Jönsson, Ass. Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gothenburg Universitity
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Department of surgery, University Hospital
Linköping, , Sweden
Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital
Lund, , Sweden
Department of Surgery, University Hospital
Örebro, , Sweden
Gastro Center Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Department of Surgery, University Hospital
Umeå, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Double bypass vs Stent
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.