Development of an International Remote Digital Care System for Accessible, Inclusive and Sustainable Pregnancy Care
NCT ID: NCT07191236
Last Updated: 2025-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-02-17
2028-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will evaluate the use of telemonitoring in pregnancy care in four European hospitals. Participants with high-risk pregnancies who require frequent cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring and blood pressure (BP) measurements will use certified home devices to record fetal and maternal health data. Instead of hospital-based monitoring, CTG and BP measurements will be performed at home and assessed by trained healthcare professionals.
The main purpose of the study is to investigate whether home monitoring is a safe and acceptable alternative to in-hospital monitoring, and to identify what is needed for successful national and international implementation of remote digital pregnancy care. The investigators will collect clinical and implementation outcomes. By doing so, this study aims to keep pregnancy care accessible for all women, improve patient well-being, and reduce pressure on the healthcare system.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Personalized Prenatal Care for Low-Risk Pregnancies Using Telemedicine
NCT01970436
Remote Telemedicine Fetal Monitoring Feasibility Study
NCT06366711
Mobile-based Obstetric Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension and/or Diabetes (MOM-HD)
NCT07243886
Remote Cardiotocography Telemonitoring Within High-risk Pregnancy Care
NCT07124325
HOME: Home Monitoring of High-risk Pregnancies
NCT05763069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is conducted in four tertiary referral centers for obstetric care: University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Spain, and Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. These hospitals serve large and diverse populations and have extensive experience with managing high-risk pregnancies, providing an international perspective on the implementation and effectiveness of RDPC.
Telemonitoring will be conducted with CE-certified CTG devices (PregnaBit Pro with PregnaOne Platform or Mosos CTG by ICT/HCTS, or the Nemo fetal monitoring system by Nemo Healthcare), and in some centers, blood pressure will be monitored using Microlife WatchBP devices. All devices are CE-certified and not classified as investigational products in this study.
The study follows a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness design. First, this study will assess clinical outcomes of participants undergoing telemonitoring. The study will investigate adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes to ensure that home monitoring is a safe alternative to hospital-based care. To further assess the clinical effectiveness of telemonitoring, investigators will evaluate health care consumption of pregnant participants during telemonitoring, such as the number of days each participant received telemonitoring and number and indications of unplanned hospital visits and admissions. These data will provide insight into the health care demands associated with the telemonitoring care pathways. These measures will provide valuable insights into the efficiency and scalability of telemonitoring.
In addition to clinical outcomes, this study will evaluate implementation outcomes across three sequential phases: pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation. Outcomes are based on the taxonomy of Proctor et al., including acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, costs, penetration, and sustainability. Implementation data will be collected from patients and obstetric healthcare professionals, and hospital systems through questionnaires, interviews, and structured data analyses.
Data will be collected and managed in Castor EDC, a GCP-classified web-based data management platform. Data entry will be performed by local research teams, with centralized oversight and quality assurance procedures. Analyses will include descriptive statistics, logistic regression to evaluate the composite clinical endpoint, and regression models to identify factors influencing implementation success.
Ultimately, this study aims to generate knowledge, recommendations, and scalable care models that enable sustainable nationwide and international integration of remote digital pregnancy care, keeping care accessible while reducing system pressure and costs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Telemonitoring cohort
This prospective cohort consists of pregnant individuals with high-risk complications who require frequent cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring according to local protocol. Instead of receiving in-hospital CTG monitoring, participants will perform CTG recordings at home, with optional blood pressure (BP) measurements. Recordings are transmitted securely and reviewed by trained obstetric healthcare providers, followed by telephone or video contact. This cohort represents real-world implementation of remote digital pregnancy care and enables evaluation of clinical and implementation outcomes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A singleton pregnancy of ≥26+0 weeks of gestation (UMCU, EMC, and Vall d'Hebron) or ≥24+0 weeks of gestation (Karolinska)
* Able to give informed consent.
* Proficiency in English or the local language (Dutch, Spanish or Swedish)
* The presence of a complication requiring CTG monitoring according to local protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Expected obstetric intervention within 48 hours
* Current blood pressure ≥160 mmHg systolic or ≥110 mmHg diastolic
* Active antepartum hemorrhage
* CTG abnormalities suggestive of fetal stress or hypoxia
* Residence located more than a 30-minute drive from any hospital (not necessarily the hospital initiating home monitoring)
* Presence of an implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mireille Bekker
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martine Depmann, Dr.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam (EMC)
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Catalan health institute: Vall d'Hebron University Hospital & Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Region Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bekker MN, Stephansson O, Maiz N, van der Kemp M, Ahaus K, Franx A. Digital healthcare as a solution for global challenges: A call for action. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Feb;104(2):250-252. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15066. Epub 2025 Jan 28. No abstract available.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
Bekker MN, Koster MPH, Keusters WR, Ganzevoort W, de Haan-Jebbink JM, Deurloo KL, Seeber L, van der Ham DP, Zuithoff NPA, Frederix GWJ, van den Heuvel JFM, Franx A. Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL). Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e116-e124. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00231-X.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
European Perinatal Health Report: Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe from 2015 to 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
240036
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OBS_24U-1738
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.